Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

ultant and Exchange MVP > > http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > ** ** > > *From:* helpdesk UK [mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, July 01, 2011 5:09 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains**

RE: Single Forest multiple Child domains

tant and Citrix Technology Professional (and MCT) http://dabcc.com/Webster From: helpdesk UK [mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com<mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com>] Subject: Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains so I read up once on this going back in NT days.. AGLP Create a user Add the user to a

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

esting >>> perspective, global groups from any domain in the forest can be members of >>> universal groups, and universal groups can be members of any domain local >>> groups in the forest. >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Hope that helps. >>>

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

the forest can be members of >> universal groups, and universal groups can be members of any domain local >> groups in the forest. >> >> ** ** >> >> Hope that helps. >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> Carl Webster >

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

** > > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional (and MCT)**** > > http://dabcc.com/Webster > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* helpdesk UK [mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com] > *Subject:* Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains > > ** ** > >

RE: Single Forest multiple Child domains

[mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains so I read up once on this going back in NT days.. AGLP Create a user Add the user to a Global Group Add the global group to Local Group Assign permissions Now in win2k8 days we add the mix of UG...

RE: Single Forest multiple Child domains

I remember by using the acronym: UGLIER.. Users go in Globals... Globals go in Locals... Locals are assigned to Resources... Paul G. From: helpdesk UK [mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 June 2011 22:18 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

> Consultant and Exchange MVP > > http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > ** ** > > *From:* helpdesk UK [mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, June 27, 2011 4:21 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:20 PM, helpdesk UK wrote: > Can we access files in the the remote office as well please ? That's a definite "Maybe". It will depend on bandwidth, latency, name resolution, how users access resources, what permissions they have, how their profiles are setup, how patien

RE: Single Forest multiple Child domains

That's where your UG and domain local groups come into play. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: helpdesk UK [mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 4:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Single Forest mul

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

So reading everyone comments I can take this back to our manager clearly and leave the decision in his hands. There is one other thing which I know has not been asked but they will start requesting this sooner rather than later. Can we access files in the the remote office as well please ? So to

re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

I think the only way to do this, without re-training users, would be to to write a custom credential provider (similar to the custom GINA's that were written for previous verions of Windows). Here is a good discussion on this topic: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163489.aspx#S5 My

RE: Single Forest multiple Child domains

stem Admin Issues Subject: Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains I wish it was that easy !!! :( Hence we are scratching our heads to find alternate options to overcome that By creating Universal groups and adding them to local domain users ? I guess no one has suggested that so that is not a

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

IF you knew THEN what you know NOW you would have started them all out that way when W7 was introduced in the environment... ;) On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ben Scott wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:21 PM, helpdesk UK > wrote: > > The clients would have to type the following domain\user

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:21 PM, helpdesk UK wrote: > The clients would have to type the following domain\username in that > case.i.e. in Win 7 You won't get around that. That's how Windows knows what domain the user account is in. You will need to educate your users. Sorry. -- Ben ~

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

lf at any moment -Original Message- From: helpdesk UK Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:30:17 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains I wish it was that easy !!! :( Hence we are scratching our heads to find alter

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

-- > *From: * helpdesk UK > *Date: *Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:21:13 +0100 > *To: *NT System Admin Issues > *ReplyTo: * "NT System Admin Issues" < > ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com> > *Subject: *Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains > > We are no

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

n, 27 Jun 2011 18:21:13 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains We are not using WINS All clients are using Win 7 so the drop down menu does not exist anyways. The clients would have to type the following *doma

Re: Single Forest multiple Child domains

> > ** ** > > *From:* Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] > *Sent:* Monday, June 27, 2011 11:55 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Single Forest multiple Child domains > > ** ** > > *Other than what I perceive to be a not so g

RE: Single Forest multiple Child domains

Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 11:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Single Forest multiple Child domains Other than what I perceive to be a not so good design, I'm not sure I understand what the problem you're trying to

RE: Single Forest multiple Child domains

Other than what I perceive to be a not so good design, I'm not sure I understand what the problem you're trying to solve is? Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: helpdesk UK [mailto:uk.helpd...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 27, 201