I can't say anything.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:r...@finnesey.com]
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 5:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
I am really keen to implement a bring your own device model and offer hosted
desktops but I am
: Sunday, November 11, 2012 3:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
You shouldn't have to worry about that. Seriously. Get your TAM or PAM to quote
it to you.
Licensing for VDI with SC2012SP1 should be simpler, but I think it's still NDA,
so I can't say anything
to focus on VDI till
Dec/Jan right now the focus is CRM but it would be nice to budget for VDI now.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
You shouldn't have
We keep getting pushed to the LAR witch is Dell.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 12:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
You'd want the account manager or their attached ATS to help
9, 2012 5:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
I am really keen to implement a bring your own device model and offer hosted
desktops but I am having a hell of a time working out the licensing
requirements.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich
System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
No, sorry. Within 90 days after GA for Windows Server 2012 was the official
word, I believe.
But if you want to deploy a live environment on Day 1, you need to be using the
software now.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:r
Admin Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: RE: VDI in a Box?
I am really keen to implement a bring your own device model and offer hosted
desktops but I am having a hell of a time working out the licensing
requirements.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith
, November 9, 2012 5:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: VDI in a Box?
For System Center stuff? Or Citrix?
I do a hell of a lot of BYO stuff but its all Citrix-centric
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey r...@finnesey.com
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 22:20:07
To: NT
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2012 9:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
No, sorry. Within 90 days after GA for Windows Server 2012 was the official
word, I believe.
But if you want
8:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
SP1 has been released?
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
You should also take a look
Ease of deployment and expansion. If you use the Dell stuff along with
VDI-In-A-Box, you basically just buy what you need, stand it up and add
more as necessary. It's dead easy to get it set up and running - hence the
name.
However - there is currently no migration process between the higher-end
One final point - don't forget that XenApp (traditional Citrix, as it
were) can provide a lot of the VDI features through a published desktop.
I've seen many places looking at VDI solutions that didn't consider
published desktops in XenApp. A lot of these implementations didn't need
VDI (either
You should also take a look at System Center 2012 VMM (with SP1). It's very
slick!
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: VDI in a Box?
Hey list.
We're just starting to
SP1 has been released?
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
You should also take a look at System Center 2012 VMM (with SP1). It's very
slick
Not yet. “rumored” to be first of 2013.
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Ryan Finnesey
Sent: November 6, 2012 8:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI in a Box?
SP1 has been released?
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent
December 2011 18:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: VDI
I wasn't keen on View for remote users. YMMV, but I found PCoIP rubbish
remotely. Things may have improved.
Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird
From: pdw1...@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:42:39 -0500
apps on
view desktops remotely in a pinch. And we're sill running 4.6.
From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI
PCoIP is still rubbish when used over an ASDL type
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 1:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: VDI
What kind of thin clients are you using at the desktop? Are you using vcenter
to deploy updates and patches to the View desktops? All 400 desktops are on a
LAN or do you have some connecting via WAN?
On Wed
Initial deployment would be around 100 users and a possibility of 50-80 RAS
users.
Thanks for the reminder about Brian Madden. I forgot all about that site.
Subject: Re: VDI
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
From: kz2...@googlemail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:37:39 +
I
I agree, Harry. I'd like to justify using View. We haven't got a quote on it
yet so a lot depends on how close it is to the Symantec solution.
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:19:54 -0500
Subject: Re: VDI
From: hbo...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
I don't know a thing about CWS
We're using GE Centricity in our practices and went with VMware View for our
desktops. So far we're very pleased with it, running about 400 desktops now.
It sure makes doing updates and patches and whole lot easier and faster. We
can re-deploy all of the desktops in just a few hours.
Thanks
.
--
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:19:54 -0500
Subject: Re: VDI
From: hbo...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
I don't know a thing about CWS and I know you mentioned Citrix but have
you looked at their VDI-in-a-Box solution?
http://www.citrix.com
-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:42:39 -0500
To: NT Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: VDI
I agree, Harry. I'd like to justify using View. We haven't got a quote on it
yet so a lot depends on how
-To: NT System Admin Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: RE: VDI
I agree, Harry. I'd like to justify using View. We haven't got a quote on it
yet so a lot depends on how close it is to the Symantec solution.
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:19:54 -0500
Subject: Re: VDI
From: hbo
...@hotmail.commailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com
Reply-To: NT Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:42:39 -0500
To: NT Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: VDI
I agree, Harry. I'd like
What kind of thin clients are you using at the desktop? Are you using
vcenter to deploy updates and patches to the View desktops? All 400
desktops are on a LAN or do you have some connecting via WAN?
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Kelsey, John jckel...@drmc.org wrote:
We’re using GE
[mailto:jckel...@drmc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 1:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VDI
We're using GE Centricity in our practices and went with VMware View for our
desktops. So far we're very pleased with it, running about 400 desktops now.
It sure makes doing updates
@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:39:31 +
To: NT Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: VDI
I wasn't keen on View for remote users. YMMV, but I found PCoIP rubbish
remotely. Things may have improved.
Sent from my SR-71
I don't know a thing about CWS and I know you mentioned Citrix but have you
looked at their VDI-in-a-Box solution?
http://www.citrix.com/English/ps2/products/product.asp?contentID=2316437
I would try my best to somehow justify the price difference to get either
VM and Citrix as those two players
I have never used the Symantec solution, but XenDesktop and View are the most
popular. However for a small amount of users the complexity of XenDesktop is
quite high. VDI-in-a-box is the less complex Citrix solution, but as yet there
is no easy upgrade path from VIAB to Xen should you need it.
30 matches
Mail list logo
