System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection and Exclusions
I'm betting the rule set on that firewall is a bit complex...
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:56, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> Firewall in between, as well as a different switching matrix.
>
> Regards,
>
&
//TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:04 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection and Exclusions
>
> Isolated in what way?
>
> Just a s
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection and Exclusions
Isolated in what way?
Just a separate subnet, or on a separate subnet with a firewall (or
router with ACLs)?
Or something more than that?
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 06:17, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> I’ve got several clients whose server farm
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 8:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection and Exclusions
I've got several clients whose server farm is isolated from their user desktops
and therefore chose to not run standard AV.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchang
;
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
>
> From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:01 AM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>
> Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection and Exclusions
>
>
&
ot run standard AV.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
> From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:15 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Symantec
011 9:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection and Exclusions
There's not many server-end systems that don't need exclusions. On XenApp,
without a particular set of them you can't get EdgeSight working effectively,
either - and if you use AppSense
er [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:01 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection and Exclusions
>
> ** **
>
> Tried that. Gave up. Found some posts saying in the managed version of
> SEP t
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection and Exclusions
Tried that. Gave up. Found some posts saying in the managed version
:pchow...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 7:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection and Exclusions
You may have access to the key but not Regedit perms. Try importing from an
elevated cmd prompt ?
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 23, 2011, at 11:58 PM, W
ry key:
>
>
>
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint
> Protection\AV\Exclusions]
>
>
>
> I exported it but when I try to import the .reg file, I get an access denied.
> I gave my account FC permission to the key but still a n
We saw seriously slow installs when we had not removed the previous
antivirus. We upgraded the servers from SAV 10 to SEP 11 and our
expectation was that the install would upgrade the existing, which it did,
but at a time cost. It was much faster to uninstall SAV10, restart and then
install SEP 1
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 06:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SEP Symantec Endpoint Protection
We are installing SEP on servers. Some are taking a short time, some are
going on for a long time (1, 3, 5 Hours.) I am looking for someone with a
similar situation. It is an
*
>
> ' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
>
> *From:* Michael Miller [mailto:burner...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 11, 2011 9:36 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: SEP Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
11, 2011 11:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SEP Symantec Endpoint Protection
Identical, including # and size of files, including temp directories ?
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, & Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SEP Symantec Endpoint Protection
Due to the the size of our company, I cant switch to Vipre. If i could
switch, it wouldn't be for a long while. I wish I could that would be nice.
There is nothing different about them from what I can tell. They
Due to the the size of our company, I cant switch to Vipre. If i could
switch, it wouldn't be for a long while. I wish I could that would be nice.
There is nothing different about them from what I can tell. They are
identical, with patches and everything down to the T.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:2
What's different about the servers that are taking so long?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Michael Miller wrote:
> We are installing SEP on servers. Some are taking a short time, some are
> going on for a long time (1, 3, 5 Hours.) I am looking for someone with a
> similar situation. It is a
Get Vipre. Seriously.
Failing that, change the installation to "AV and AntiSpyware only" or
whatever the option is. That saved a lot of time the last time I was forced
to use that hideous product.
On 11 February 2011 12:13, Michael Miller wrote:
> We are installing SEP on servers. Some are taki
We are installing SEP on servers. Some are taking a short time, some are
going on for a long time (1, 3, 5 Hours.) I am looking for someone with a
similar situation. It is an upgraded install, its on a phyical box.
For some it installs fast, for others it is very lengthy. For such a huge
company a
And Oregon probably pays the highest.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection
As far as I know Florida pays the lowest of any state/territory/possession.
Jon
On Thu, Jul 31
t;
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:49 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
> Lucky you at 30 years Florida only pays 48% of your average best 3 years as
> retirement wit
Poor bastard. There are Oregon State Retires making 125% of their ending
salary.PERS is a truly screwed up system.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Lucky you at 30 years
:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG -
http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1579 -
Release Date: 7/29/2008 6:43 AM
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja
or anyone here either.
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
> --
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:49 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
&g
min Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG -
http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1579 -
Release Date: 7/29/2008 6:43 AM
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ <http:
> *From:* Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 29, 2008 1:53 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
> Wows that is a seriously wacked situation, I wish you the best of luck with
> that. And maybe its
*From:* Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:47 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
> Just had a union workplace meeting today at lunch, with our union's
> bargaining team. One of them sa
ot; - JFK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Oh give me a tool to remove Symantec 9 and 10 and I will have a PO
tomorrow. Ok, well maybe end o
CSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
Phone: 401-639-3505
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Just had a union workplace meeting today at lunch, with ou
Phone: 401-639-3505
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Just had a union workplace meeting today at lunch, with our union's
bargaining team. O
ns, making up the difference in our paychecks, which could save a lot
of people.
Joe Heaton
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 1:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
I see
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Exactly. It's all a political ploy, but our unions are massively up in
arms at the moment. He was supposed to sign the Executive Order this
morning, but has delayed that until Thursday. Once he signs it, pretty
much
dward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 1:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
How the hell can you live in CA at 6.55 a hr? SO he wants to put all the
Govt workers in card-board boxes because earning that much an hr you be
better off
-3505
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Well, seems that our support with Symantec isn't up until December, so I
don't think I'm g
24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Hey, and don't forget Sunbelt's Ninja for the exchange server.
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/Ninja-Email-Security/
While we are talking, VIPRE Enterprise on the desktop wi
e. The AD
>> integration looks seems to work well (small network experience only though).
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> *Sent:* 28 July 2008 21:44
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>>
ernal server is now stable. The AD
> integration looks seems to work well (small network experience only though).
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 28 July 2008 21:44
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Symantec Endpoint P
Oh give me a tool to remove Symantec 9 and 10 and I will have a PO
tomorrow. Ok, well maybe end of the week..
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Like what
___
> From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 6:30 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
> "But I do like that we have the one brand for both desktop AV and Exchange
> AV, and
Enterprise/
Simon, ask for a quote. Will make you an offer you cannot refuse.
Warm regards,
Stu
From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 6:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
"But I do li
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 July 2008 21:44
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
So I guess what I'm really asking here, now that I'm not trying to bash
Symantec, is this:
Are there enough impro
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
So I guess what I'm really asking here, now that I'm not trying to bash
Symantec, is this:
Are there enough improvements with the new version (mainly overhead,
bloat, etc.) to recommend upgrading to it? My u
hat
we have the one brand for both desktop AV and Exchange AV, and would
like to keep it that way.
Joe Heaton
From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 11:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protect
ence. I'll probably keep renewing my clients for one more year and
then see.
Mike
From: Michael Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 July 2008 19:11
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
I have v11.. and the latest greatest rendition, MP2 MR1.. fa
I have v11.. and the latest greatest rendition, MP2 MR1.. fantastic..
But for email servers, id use trend micro's scanmail. IMHO.
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Symantec Endpoint Protection
Anyone
I think for a stand-alone PC that is an unmanaged client SEP is a pretty
decent product. In a domain environment it is not so good. It's definitely
a MUCH better product now then it was at launch, but that's not saying too
much. I am still not confident enough with it to be comfortable installin
Anyone using this that is happy with it? Also, is there anyone here
that doesn't think Symantec is a big pile? I personally hate the
product, and wish that I made the decisions around here, but I don't, so
I have to come up with objective reviews of SEP, and whether or not we
should upgrade from
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> VIPRE is actually done, it's shipping in current versions of CounterSpy.
> But
: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection Feedback
I was hoping I could install it on a virtual server on VMWare VI3, but from the
comments that sounds unlikely to work.
thanks and regards
OS
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday
lable
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: kenw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: lunedì 25 febbraio 2008 0.46
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Symantec Endpoint Protection Feedback
I found the management console inappropriate for small sites or virtual servers
- it wanted half a CPU all by i
Subject: Re: Symantec Endpoint Protection Feedback
No problems on our end. would have prefered to switch to something new,
but it looks like we might do that in 2009 after some more research.
The server component (as was already said) is absolutely hefty. We ended
up installing it on our WSUS
ot;NT System Admin Issues"
To
"NT System Admin Issues"
cc
Subject
Symantec Endpoint Protection Feedback
I am planning to have a look at SEP 11.
Symantec AV doesn't get much praise here but so far it was working OK
for us. No major comp
;
To
"NT System Admin Issues"
cc
Subject
Symantec Endpoint Protection Feedback
I am planning to have a look at SEP 11.
Symantec AV doesn't get much praise here but so far it was working OK for
us. No major complaints.
If you have anything positive/negative to share pls
: Osama Salah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: domenica 24 febbraio 2008 11.22
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: Symantec Endpoint Protection Feedback
I am planning to have a look at SEP 11.
Symantec AV doesn't get much praise here but so far it was working OK
for us. No major complaints.
I
I am planning to have a look at SEP 11.
Symantec AV doesn't get much praise here but so far it was working OK
for us. No major complaints.
If you have anything positive/negative to share pls let me know what to
look out for.
regards
Osama Salah
--
56 matches
Mail list logo
