I was looking over the system requirements for a particular piece of
software we're looking at purchasing, and I noticed that it specifically
says it has to be on a physical (non-virtual) machine.
Now, this software doesn't have any special hardware requirements.
Processor requirements are modest,
ganization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
Phone: 401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
I was looking over the system requireme
ter ID and thus have multiple
copies of it. That's just my best guess though.
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
I was looking
rom: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
Its probably because the vendor doesn't know anything about VM's, and
wants it on physical hardware, either that or it pro
+1 Times 10.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
Its probably because the vendor doesn't know anything about VM's, and
w
July 22, 2008 2:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
Because either A. They have run into issues supporting it or B. They
don't
want to support it.
I have a few software apps that say similar and it's really because they
base the serial #
Why would a product not work on a virtual server, well, one that is high
I/O, as in a database server would possibly not work. What application
specifically are you looking at that says this?
We've used virtual servers for probably 5 years now, and we've always taken
the approach that we will try
I didn't know you could count that high. :)
Shook
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
+1 Times 10.
Dave
-Original Message-
From:
ation
MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
Phone: 401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
I suspect that the vendor just doesn't
: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
>
> Because either A. They have run into issues supporting it or B. They
> don't
> want to support it.
>
> I have a few software apps that say similar and it's really because they
> b
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
y 22, 2008 2:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
Why would a product not work on a virtual server, well, one that is high
I/O, as in a database server would possibly not work. What application
specifically are you looking at that says this?
We
> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:14 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
>
>
>
> Why would a product not work on a virtual server, well, one that is high
> I/O
This is Follett's "Destiny" product.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
I am getting a 404 on that page what is the name of the prod
t; Phone: 401-639-3505
> --
>
> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:14 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
She
<
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is Follett's "Destiny" product.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:30 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Will it
008 at 2:33 PM, John Hornbuckle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is Follett's "Destiny" product.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
I
er?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:14 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
>
>
>
> Why would a product not work on a virtual serve
. Ziots
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
Phone: 401-639-3505
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtuali
From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
How big are your databases Sherry, and how many folks are hitting them?
Dave
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
We've got about 14 SQL and/or other produ
1-639-3505
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
How big are your databases Sherry, and how many folks are hitting them?
Dave
From: S
*EWG* is that a polite thing to ask in mixed company?? ROFLMAO!!!
_
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
How big are your databases Sherry, and how many
: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
*EWG* is that a polite thing to ask in mixed company?? ROFLMAO!!!
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:24 PM
To
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
*EWG* is that a polite thing to ask in mixed company?? ROFLMAO!!!
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
-3505
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
raises hand at "Demented thinkers", and come to think of it, I've
answered to "s
And of course that would be for Puppy Pounding!
_
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
Hey at least you aren't afraid to admit it, if I did they lo
e boards or the likes.
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
I suspect that the vendor just doesn't want the added layer of
complexity that com
___
>
> From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:24 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
>
>
>
> How big are your databases Sherry, and how many folks are hitting them?
>
I've been running Destiny virtualized on ESX for serveral months. Not a
single issue.
JR
_
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
This is Follett'
If that's the case then would it be a problem with Exchange? Those databases
are much bigger than 3-5GB.
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
We don't
gt; --
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:30 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
>
>
>
>
>
>
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
virtualized?
If that's the case then would it be a problem with Exchange? Those databases
are much bigger than 3-5GB.
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
We
, July 23, 2008 2:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
If thats the case then would it be a problem with Exchange? Those databases
are much bigger than 3-5GB.
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:26 PM
crombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:48 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
>
>
>
> We've got about 14 SQL and/or other production database servers running in
> VMWare, plus 3 - 4 times that
work virtualized?
I've been running Destiny virtualized on ESX for serveral months. Not a
single issue.
JR
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really
Good to know. Thanks for the feedback from both of you!
From: Walker, Clay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
Same here but we're running it on MS Virtual Server
:00
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Will it *really* not work virtualized?
I have one that is over 6GB with about 75-100 people hitting it, very
heavy usage. This particular one has been virtualized for 5 years.
We've had issues with it once on performance when we applied an update
38 matches
Mail list logo
