required.
We use a VPLS service from Masergy over as number of sites both in the US and
worldwide, and are very happy with it.
Cheers
Matt
From: Level Five - lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: 29 June 2010 23:41
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtual ethernet service
Maybe
Can someone explain this to me?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
It's a four letter word beginning with t, followed by h, and ending with is.
And we all know that everything is dependent on what the meaning of is is.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:19 PM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Can someone explain this to me?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
Well played...:)
Shook
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet service
It's a four letter word beginning with t, followed by h, and ending with is.
And we all know that everything
But if that explained this then what explains that?
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet service
It's a four letter word beginning with t
this then what explains that?
--
*From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:23 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: virtual ethernet service
It's a four letter word beginning with t, followed by h, and ending
I see.
Virtual Ethernet Service?
An over simplified MPLS??
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet service
Well, by extension, that seems rather
service
I see.
Virtual Ethernet Service?
An over simplified MPLS??
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet service
Well, by extension, that seems rather simple
System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtual ethernet service
I see.
Virtual Ethernet Service?
An over simplified MPLS??
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet
That that is, is. That that is not, is not. Is it? It is.
From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtual ethernet service
But if that explained this then what explains
Issues
Subject: RE: virtual ethernet service
I see.
Virtual Ethernet Service?
An over simplified MPLS??
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet service
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:19 PM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Can someone explain this to me?
Context?
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtual ethernet service
How do they make it cheaper then?
How is it simplified from MPLS if they have to have the MPLS in the first place?
From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:38 PM
Subject line??
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet service
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:19 PM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com
wrote:
Can someone explain this to me
We have Layer2 fiber switching down here, which gives me full QinQ control
and vlans all over layer2. I guess that could be coined virtual Ethernet
since they are connecting me to a cisco catalyst switch with an Ethernet
handoff.
I leaned away from MPLS due to latency, non control and this
Not stolen at all.
More edifying than anything.
Still confused though.
From: Level Five - lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtual ethernet service
We have Layer2 fiber
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:45 PM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Can someone explain this to me?
Context?
Subject line??
Fine, then try this:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22virtual+ethernet+service%22
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
, June 29, 2010 3:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet service
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:45 PM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com
wrote:
Can someone explain this to me?
Context?
Subject line??
Fine, then try this:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22virtual+ethernet
The first link appears to provide a pretty good explanation, too...
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:45 PM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Can someone explain this to me?
Context?
No, this explains that. What does nothing for that about this.
From: David McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtual ethernet service
But if that explained this then what explains
Another good one:
1. Virtual Private LAN Services: Extending Ethernet over the WAN
http://www.tellabs.com/resources/papers/tlab_vplswan.pdf
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet
]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtual ethernet service
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:45 PM, David McSpadden dav...@imcu.com
wrote:
Can someone explain this to me?
Context?
Subject line??
Fine, then try this:
http://www.google.com/search?q
at the dmarc.
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtual ethernet service
Maybe sort of like VLAN's for packets, using ports or magic or something..to
create different levels of QoS for different
- 312.731.3132
From: Jay Dale [mailto:jay.d...@3-gig.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtual ethernet service
They don't have to use the MPLS - that's just an option. They can use any kind
of platform - ATM, FR, etc. Whatever the costs drive them
24 matches
Mail list logo
