On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:35 PM Ryan May wrote:
> When experts say that something is a bad idea, and when the people who
>> a CoC is supposed to protect says it makes them feel unsafe, I feel
>> like we should listen to that.
>>
>> I also thought that the points made in the Jupyter discussion thre
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Ryan May wrote:
> So I hear all the arguments about people feeling unsafe due to some truly
> despicable, discriminatory behavior, and I want absolutely no parts of
> protecting that. However, I also recognize that we in the U.S. are in a
> particularly divisive atm
>
> When experts say that something is a bad idea, and when the people who
> a CoC is supposed to protect says it makes them feel unsafe, I feel
> like we should listen to that.
>
> I also thought that the points made in the Jupyter discussion thread
> made a lot of sense: of course it's possible f
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:37 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
>>> wrote:
I realize this was probably brought
I propose to accept NEP-18, "A dispatch mechanism for NumPy’s high level
array functions":
http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0018-array-function-protocol.html
Since the last round of discussion, we added a new section on "Callable
objects generated at runtime" clarifying that to handle such objects is
This. Even from a US perspective, we really need to not let political
division into even more apparently non-political things. As far as I can
tell, the current language seems to be there to specifically avoid that. It
isn't there to allow discrimination if someone tries to claim they're
making a p
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
>>> wrote:
>>>
I realize this was probably b
I agree with Ralf. That thread is more towards a US based separation.
Actually we briefly touched upon these on the SciPy side but indeed there
was no real discussion.
Political beliefs (especially communism in US for a practical example) can
offend some people and that's OK because being offended
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I realize this was probably brought up in the discussions about the
>>> scipy code of conduct which I h
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I realize this was probably brought up in the discussions about the scipy
>>> code of conduct which
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
> wrote:
>
>> I realize this was probably brought up in the discussions about the scipy
>> code of conduct which I have not looked at, but I’m troubled by the
>> inclusion of “political bel
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
wrote:
> I realize this was probably brought up in the discussions about the scipy
> code of conduct which I have not looked at, but I’m troubled by the
> inclusion of “political beliefs” in the document.
>
It was not brought up explicitly as far
I realize this was probably brought up in the discussions about the scipy
code of conduct which I have not looked at, but I’m troubled by the
inclusion of “political beliefs” in the document.
See e.g.
https://github.com/jupyter/governance/pull/5
As a thought experiment, what if someone’s politica
13 matches
Mail list logo
