Re: [Numpy-discussion] The http://planet.scipy.org/ site is down.

2018-08-20 Thread Pauli Virtanen
ma, 2018-08-20 kello 10:18 -0700, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti: [clip] > Number 1 on my wish list for an alternative is something that's > either > hosted or serverless; we always have problems with any server that > needs > maintaining. Right now there's on healthy server for > scipy.org/docs.scipy.org,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] The http://planet.scipy.org/ site is down.

2018-08-20 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 4:39 AM Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Unfortunately the machine that was hosting planet.scipy.org has died. > > The volunteer that was supporting it, Sheila Miguez, had warned the scipy > leadership for over a year that it was going down. Over the last six months > after the Ra

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Add pybind11 to docs about writing binding code

2018-08-20 Thread Chris Barker
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > I'm confused, do you have a link or example showing how to use > xtensor-python without pybind11? > I think you may have it backwards: """ The Python bindings for xtensor are based on the pybind11 C++ library, which enables seemless interope

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Add pybind11 to docs about writing binding code

2018-08-20 Thread Sylvain Corlay
Thanks guys. If we add pybind11 and xtensor, boost.python is also a good contender there. S. On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 11:51 Hans Dembinski wrote: > Dear Robert, > > > On 17. Aug 2018, at 23:44, Robert Kern wrote: > > > > Even if you don't use the numpy-mimicking parts of the xtensor API, > xtens

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Add pybind11 to docs about writing binding code

2018-08-20 Thread Neal Becker
I'm confused, do you have a link or example showing how to use xtensor-python without pybind11? Thanks, Neal On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:50 PM Hans Dembinski wrote: > Dear Robert, > > > On 17. Aug 2018, at 23:44, Robert Kern wrote: > > > > Even if you don't use the numpy-mimicking parts of the xt

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

2018-08-20 Thread Stephan Hoyer
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 8:27 AM Charles R Harris wrote: > Ping to finish up this discussion so we can come to a conclusion. I'm in > favor of the NEP, as I don't see it as orthogonal to Nathaniel's concerns. > However, we might want to be selective as to which functions we expose via > the `__arr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Add pybind11 to docs about writing binding code

2018-08-20 Thread Hans Dembinski
Dear Robert, > On 17. Aug 2018, at 23:44, Robert Kern wrote: > > Even if you don't use the numpy-mimicking parts of the xtensor API, > xtensor-python is a probably a net improvement over pybind11 for > communicating arrays back and forth across the C++/Python boundary. Even if > the rest of y

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

2018-08-20 Thread Charles R Harris
Ping to finish up this discussion so we can come to a conclusion. I'm in favor of the NEP, as I don't see it as orthogonal to Nathaniel's concerns. However, we might want to be selective as to which functions we expose via the `__array_function__` method. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Stephan

Re: [Numpy-discussion] The http://planet.scipy.org/ site is down.

2018-08-20 Thread Andy Ray Terrel
Unfortunately the machine that was hosting planet.scipy.org has died. The volunteer that was supporting it, Sheila Miguez, had warned the scipy leadership for over a year that it was going down. Over the last six months after the Rackspace open source program has ended she repeatedly reached out f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] The http://planet.scipy.org/ site is down.

2018-08-20 Thread Didrik Pinte
Andy Terrel and I have been in the process of migrating the service out of Rackspace account. There was an issue when the Rackspace machine and its snapshots got deleted a little too fast. We're working on recovering the service asap. -- Didrik On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 16:52, Gael Varoquaux wrote: