Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: split numpy.distutils into it's own package

la, 2020-10-24 kello 03:11 -0400, Dustin Spicuzza kirjoitti: > Cross-compiling scipy and other projects that depend on numpy's > distutils is a huge pain right now, because to do it [in addition to > lots of other details that you have to get right] you have to have > both > a native and cross-comp

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Using a pyproject.toml file

su, 2019-07-14 kello 09:46 -0500, Matti Picus kirjoitti: [clip] > Questions: > - Is the pain of adding a pyproject.toml worth it for using towncrier > or should we o for another release-note solution > - Is the addition of pyproject.toml problematic enough that I should > break it out into a separa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] The http://planet.scipy.org/ site is down.

ti, 2018-08-21 kello 01:02 +0200, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti: [clip] > Not volunteering to take this into completion, though. Well, turns out otherwise: https://planetscipy.netlify.com/ https://github.com/pv/staticplanet/ It's just a essentially stateless static site generator that can b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] The http://planet.scipy.org/ site is down.

ma, 2018-08-20 kello 10:18 -0700, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti: [clip] > Number 1 on my wish list for an alternative is something that's > either > hosted or serverless; we always have problems with any server that > needs > maintaining. Right now there's on healthy server for > scipy.org/docs.scipy.org,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Add pybind11 to docs about writing binding code

fo.python-as-glue.rst It also does no mention CFFI either, mostly because the original text predates the project. -- Pauli Virtanen ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 3 compatible examples

pe, 2018-06-01 kello 14:17 -0600, Charles R Harris kirjoitti: > This post is prompted by this PR /11222>. > It would be good to come up with a timeline and plan for rewriting > the > examples to be Python 3 compatible. When we do so, we should also > make it >

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 1.1.0 released

* Eric Stansifer + * Martin Thoma * Phil Tooley + * Piotr Uchwat + * Paul van Mulbregt * Pauli Virtanen * Stefan van der Walt * Warren Weckesser * Florian Weimer + * Eric Wieser * Josh Wilson * Ted Ying + * Evgeny Zhurko * Zé Vinícius * @Astrofysicus + * @awakenting + * @endolith * @FormerPhysicist + * @gau

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 3D array slicing bug?

ke, 2018-03-21 kello 20:40 +, Michael Himes kirjoitti: > I have discovered what I believe is a bug with array slicing > involving 3D (and higher) dimension arrays. When slicing a 3D array > by a single value for axis 0, all values for axis 1, and a list to > slice axis 2, the dimensionality of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 3D array slicing bug?

erence/arrays.indexing.html#combining-advanced-and-basic-indexing The key part seems to be: "There are two parts to the indexing operation, the subspace defined by the basic indexing (**excluding integers**) and the subspace from the advanced ind

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Directives in numpy docstring convention

su, 2017-12-24 kello 18:51 +, Marc Garcia kirjoitti: [clip] > I guess those directives were added to the sphinx after the numpy > docstring convention was created. Just a comment on the historical point: the Numpy docstring standard existed before first Sphinx release. -- Pauli Vi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sustainability

to, 2017-10-05 kello 00:08 +0200, Ilhan Polat kirjoitti: [clip] > 2. Feature completeness of basic modules. I think those judgments can be subjective, but it is true many things have been organically grown, and this becomes even more so as the number of contributors grows (fielding other people's

Re: [Numpy-discussion] power function distribution or power-law distribution?

scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.random.power .html > BTW. how is this list related to numpy-discuss...@scipy.org? That's the old address of this list. The current address is numpy-discussion@python.org and it should be used instead. -- Pauli Virtanen __

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Why are empty arrays False?

d will lead to rotting of third-party code. -- Pauli Virtanen ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] F2PY problems with PGI compilers

Ralf Gommers kirjoitti 14.08.2017 klo 09:51: > I'm definitely at a lose here. I have no idea how to make F2PY work > with the PGI compilers. I'm beginning to think F2PY is completely > borked unless you use the defaults (gcc). > > > That's not the case. Here is an example when using t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pytest and degrees of separation.

Charles R Harris kirjoitti 12.07.2017 klo 13:53: > In practice, that would generally be true, but the nose testing tools > were 1, all nose imports were buried in functions that ran during > testing. Whether or not that was by intent I don't know. But having an > explicit consensus on 2, which seem

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pytest and degrees of separation.

Charles R Harris kirjoitti 12.07.2017 klo 13:53: > In practice, that would generally be true, but the nose testing tools > were 1, all nose imports were buried in functions that ran during > testing. Whether or not that was by intent I don't know. But having an > explicit consensus on 2, which seem

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pytest and degrees of separation.

Charles R Harris kirjoitti 12.07.2017 klo 13:53: > In practice, that would generally be true, but the nose testing tools > were 1, all nose imports were buried in functions that ran during > testing. Whether or not that was by intent I don't know. But having an > explicit consensus on 2, which seem

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

Charles R Harris kirjoitti 29.06.2017 klo 20:45: > Here's a random idea: how about building a NumPy gallery? > scikit-{image,learn} has it, and while those projects may have more > visual datasets, I can imagine something along the lines of Nicolas > Rougier's beautiful book: > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

y.org. Not sure if there is someone who can fix this any more. -- Pauli Virtanen ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: [numfocus] Grants up to $3k available to NumFOCUS projects, (sponsored & affiliated)

y be more useful type for some applications, so it could indeed be added. -- Pauli Virtanen ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion