Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure building scipy.special.lambertw

2009-12-16 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:09:45 +, Chris wrote: Building a current checkout of scipy on OSX 10.6 fails when trying to compile scipy.special.lambertw, giving the message: Warning: No configuration returned, assuming unavailable. The full failure is here: http://img.skitch.com/20091216

[Numpy-discussion] fsum

2009-12-16 Thread Alan G Isaac
Does NumPy have an equivalent to Python's math.fsum? Thanks, Alan Isaac ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Slicing slower than matrix multiplication?

2009-12-16 Thread denis
A general question, is there a collection of numpy code snippets as transformed by experts, short of google site:mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion or the like ? And a subquestion, does anyone have a list of algebraic identities for .T vstack etc ? for a real example, to transform

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is it reasonable to summarize that, to avoid confusion, we keep 'matrix_rank' as the name? I've edited as Robert suggested, attempting to adopt a more suitable tone in the docstring... Thanks a lot,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, Is it reasonable to summarize that, to avoid confusion, we keep 'matrix_rank' as the name? I've edited as Robert suggested, attempting to adopt a more suitable tone in the docstring... What comes next when someone offers up a useful function like this? We are using an earlier version

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is it reasonable to summarize that, to avoid confusion, we keep 'matrix_rank' as the name? I've edited as Robert suggested, attempting to adopt a more suitable tone in the docstring... What comes next when

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:13:08PM -0500, Matthew Brett wrote: I'm happy to write the doctests as tests. My feeling is there is no objection to this function at the moment, so it would be reasonable, unless I hear otherwise, to commit to SVN. I have one small comment: I am really happy to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Gael Varoquaux gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:13:08PM -0500, Matthew Brett wrote: I'm happy to write the doctests as tests.   My feeling is there is no objection to this function at the moment, so it would be reasonable,

[Numpy-discussion] tracking additions to NumPy across versions

2009-12-16 Thread David Warde-Farley
Hi all, Is there currently anything in the docstring standard about tracking when functions get added to NumPy? The recent discussion of matrix_rank got me thinking about this. Regards, David ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

Re: [Numpy-discussion] tracking additions to NumPy across versions

2009-12-16 Thread David Warde-Farley
On 16-Dec-09, at 5:21 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote: Hi all, Is there currently anything in the docstring standard about tracking when functions get added to NumPy? The recent discussion of matrix_rank got me thinking about this. Once again, Google answered for me a few minutes after I