On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
The missing data thread has gotten a bit heated, and after sitting down
with Travis to discuss the issues a bit, we've concluded that it would be
nice to do a call with everyone who's interested in the discussion with
better
I thought I'd try to speed up numpy on my fedora system by rebuilding the atlas
package so it would be tuned for my machine. But when I do:
rpmbuild -ba -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
it fails with:
res/zgemvN_5000_100 : VARIATION EXCEEDS TOLERENCE, RERUN WITH HIGHER REPS.
A bit of
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I'd try to speed up numpy on my fedora system by rebuilding the
atlas
package so it would be tuned for my machine. But when I do:
rpmbuild -ba -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
it fails with:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I'd try to speed up numpy on my fedora system by rebuilding the
atlas
package so it would be tuned for my machine. But when I do:
rpmbuild -ba -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
On 07/05/2011 10:17 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Ted To rainexpec...@theo.to wrote:
Hi,
Is there an easy way to make random draws from a conditional random
variable? E.g., draw a random variable, x conditional on x=\bar x.
If you mean here truncated
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I'd try to speed up numpy on my fedora system by rebuilding
the
atlas
package so it would be tuned for my
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com
wrote:
I thought I'd try to speed up numpy
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Ted To rainexpec...@theo.to wrote:
On 07/05/2011 10:17 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Ted To rainexpec...@theo.to wrote:
Hi,
Is there an easy way to make random draws from a conditional random
variable? E.g., draw a random
On 07/05/2011 11:07 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
For example sample x=U and then sample y=u-x. That's two univariate
normal samples.
Ah, that's what I was looking for! Many thanks!
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
On 7/3/11 9:03 PM, Joe Harrington wrote:
Christopher Barker, Ph.D. wrote
quick note on this: I like the FALSE == good way, because:
So, you like to have multiple different kinds of masked, but I need
multiple good values for counts.
fair enough, maybe there isn't a consensus about what is
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On 7/3/11 9:03 PM, Joe Harrington wrote:
Christopher Barker, Ph.D. wrote
quick note on this: I like the FALSE == good way, because:
So, you like to have multiple different kinds of masked, but I need
multiple
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
Speaking of which, would we make the NA value be false?
The NEP currently states that accessing np.NA as a boolean will act as an
error. However, logical_and([NA, False]) == False and logical_or([NA,
True]) will be
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.govwrote:
Speaking of which, would we make the NA value be false?
The NEP currently states that accessing np.NA as a boolean will act as an
error.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Ted To rainexpec...@theo.to wrote:
On 07/05/2011 11:07 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
For example sample x=U and then sample y=u-x. That's two univariate
normal samples.
Ah, that's what I was looking for! Many thanks!
just in case I wasn't clear, if x and y
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com
wrote:
I thought
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Here the primary discussion I was trying to start was about why the
discussion failed and led to bad feeling.
Well, I have a hypothesis, don't know if it's true. It goes like this:
Most of the time, when one of us
Also, I can see the motivation for wanting a voice meeting, but on the
subject of keeping people in the loop, could we make sure that someone
is taking notes on what happens, and that they get posted to the list?
-- Nathaniel
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are the details for the call:
1. Please join my meeting, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:00 PM Central time.
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/972295593
2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or,
call in using your telephone.
Dial +1 (312) 878-3070
Access Code:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
lib.recfunctions has never been fully advertised. The two bugs I just
discovered
On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
lib.recfunctions has never
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Skipper Seabold jsseab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM,
Mark Wiebe writes:
We'll have someone taking notes to create a summary as Nathaniel suggested.
Thanks.
--
And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn
something new, the whole world becomes that much richer.
-- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in
Mark Wiebe wrote:
Speaking of which, would we make the NA value be false?
For booleans, it works out like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ternary_logic#Kleene_logic
That's pretty cool!
In R, trying to test the truth value of NA (if (NA) ...) raises an
exception. Adopting this
i have to reshape a matrix beta of the form (4**N, 4**N, 4**N, 4**N)
into betam like (16**N, 16**N) following:
betam = np.zeros((16**N,16**N), dtype = complex)
for k in xrange(16**N):
ind1 = np.mod(k,4**N)
ind2 = k/4**N
for l in xrange(16**N):
betam[k,l] = beta[np.mod(l,4**N),
qu...@gmx.at wrote:
i have to reshape a matrix beta of the form (4**N, 4**N, 4**N, 4**N)
into betam like (16**N, 16**N) following:
betam = np.zeros((16**N,16**N), dtype = complex)
for k in xrange(16**N):
ind1 = np.mod(k,4**N)
ind2 = k/4**N
for l in xrange(16**N):
In article BANLkTi=LXiTcrv1LgMtP=p9nF8eMr8=+h...@mail.gmail.com,
Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.6.1rc2/
Will there be a Mac binary for 32-bit pythons (one that is compatible
with older versions of MacOS X)? At present I
On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Pierre GM pgmdevl...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Hello,
The idea behin having a lib.recfunctions and not a rec.recfunctions or
whatever was to illustrate that the functions of this package are more
generic
Here's a short-ish summary of the topics discussed in the conference call
this afternoon. WARNING: I try to give examples for everything discussed to
make it as concrete as possible. However, most of the examples were not
explicitly discussed during the conference. I apologize in advance if I
Thanks for these notes. Just a couple of thoughts as I looked over these
notes.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Christopher Jordan-Squire
cjord...@uw.eduwrote:
3. Using IGNORE to signal a jagged array. e.g., [ [1, 2, IGNORE], [IGNORE,
3, 4] ] should behave exactly the same as [ [1 , 2] , [3
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Russell E. Owen ro...@uw.edu wrote:
In article BANLkTi=LXiTcrv1LgMtP=p9nF8eMr8=+h...@mail.gmail.com,
Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.6.1rc2/
Will there be a Mac binary for 32-bit pythons
30 matches
Mail list logo
