Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
I believe xmlrpclib is currently the simpler approach. Some day I'll
have the time to implement something similar using MPI communication
with mpi4py. However, I believe it can be done even better: local,
client-side proxies should automatically provide access to all
On Sep 30, 2008, at 23:16 , Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Brian Blais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks for all of the help. My initial solution is to pickle my
object,
with the text-based version of pickle, and send it across rpc. I
do this
because the actual thing I am
Hello,
I am trying to use xml-rpc to be able to run some simulations
remotely. I am running into a problem with the transfer of numpy
arrays. my server code looks like:
#!/usr/bin/env python
def again(x): # test out the sending of data
return [x,x]
from SimpleXMLRPCServer import
Hi,
in order to marshal numpy arrays, you can use the
tostring() method. The inverse is the fromstring()
function in numpy.
But you must know dtype and shape in order to
reconstruct your array.
Greetings, Uwe
On 30 Sep., 19:53, Brian Blais [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:53, Brian Blais [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use xml-rpc to be able to run some simulations remotely. I
am running into a problem with the transfer of numpy arrays. my server code
looks like:
#!/usr/bin/env python
def again(x): # test out the
Sebastien, numpy arrays are picklable; so no need to register them
with copy_reg. I believe the actual problem with xmlrpclib is that it
uses the marshal protocol (only supports core builtin types), and not
the pickle protocol.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Sebastien Binet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lisandro,
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 15:24:56 Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
Sebastien, numpy arrays are picklable; so no need to register them
with copy_reg. I believe the actual problem with xmlrpclib is that it
uses the marshal protocol (only supports core builtin types), and not
the pickle
On Sep 30, 2008, at 18:42 , Sebastien Binet wrote:
yeah... Robert pointed it to me that as xmlrpc is meant for cross-
language RPC,
sending python objects over the wire isn't so useful, hence the
usage of marshal
instead of pickle.
thanks for all of the help. My initial solution is to
Brian,
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 17:27:32 Brian Blais wrote:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 18:42 , Sebastien Binet wrote:
yeah... Robert pointed it to me that as xmlrpc is meant for cross-
language RPC,
sending python objects over the wire isn't so useful, hence the
usage of marshal
instead
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Brian Blais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks for all of the help. My initial solution is to pickle my object,
with the text-based version of pickle, and send it across rpc. I do this
because the actual thing I am sending is a dictionary, with lots of arrays,
and
10 matches
Mail list logo
