On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ondřej Čertík
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Travis Oliphant
>>> wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:28 AM, David Cournapeau wrote
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ondřej Čertík
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>> On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:28 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Travis Oliphant
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>> On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:28 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Travis Oliphant
>>> wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:28 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 22, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Travis Oliphant
>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:28 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 22, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Travis Oliphant
>
On Aug 22, 2012, at 9:28 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Travis Oliphant
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm actually not sure, why. I think the iss
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Aug 22, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that the
>> release manager can actually "build" Num
On Aug 22, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that the
> release manager can actually "build" NumPy without having to buy a particular
> compiler.
>
> That woul
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:40 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Travis Oliphant
>>> wrote:
I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is m
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:40 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>> I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that the
>>> release manager can actually "build" NumPy
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Peter
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:40 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Travis Oliphant
>>> wrote:
I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sur
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:40 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>> I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that
>>> the release manager can actually "build" NumPy
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>> I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that the
>> release manager can actually "build" NumPy without having to buy a
>> particular compiler.
>
> The MS Exp
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that the
> release manager can actually "build" NumPy without having to buy a
> particular compiler.
>
That would help, yes. MS Express doesn't work under Wine last time I
che
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that the
> release manager can actually "build" NumPy without having to buy a particular
> compiler.
The MS Express editions, while not open source, are free-to-use, and work
I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that the release
manager can actually "build" NumPy without having to buy a particular compiler.
But, I would rather have official builds of NumPy for all platforms with a
compiler paid for by a NumPy-sponsor than not have them.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Ralf Gommers > The problem is that,
unlike 32-bit builds, they can't be made with open
> source compilers on Windows. So unless we're okay with that,
Why does it have to be built with open-source compilers? we're
building against the python.org python, yes? Which
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:25:21 -0700
> > From: Matthew Brett
> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64bit infrastructure
> > To: Discussion of Numerical Python
> > Message-ID:
> >
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:25:21 -0700
> From: Matthew Brett
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64bit infrastructure
> To: Discussion of Numerical Python
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi,
>
> On
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sayth,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Sayth Renshaw
>> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I was just wondering if the current absence of 64bit builds was as a result
>>> of an infrastructure or funding concern.
>>>
>>> I like many no
Donations to NumFOCUS would be helpful in raising money to fund the creation of
64-bit installers.It always comes down to funding, but mostly people's time
is the scarce resource here.
It is more difficult to build 64-bit binaries on Windows which is the real
issue (not the availability
>
> Hi Sayth,
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I was just wondering if the current absence of 64bit builds was as a result
>> of an infrastructure or funding concern.
>>
>> I like many now have only 64 bit systems and am using the unofficial builds.
>>
>> If it
Hi Sayth,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was just wondering if the current absence of 64bit builds was as a result
> of an infrastructure or funding concern.
>
> I like many now have only 64 bit systems and am using the unofficial builds.
>
> If it was something
23 matches
Mail list logo
