Chris Mattmann wrote:
opinion, I recently downloaded and reviewed NUTCH-61, and really like the
patch. +1 on my end. I haven't tried out NUTCH-240 yet, but it seems to be a
logical extension point for Nutch to be able to plug in different scoring
components. So, +1 from me.
Thanks for lookin
> Do you guys have any additional insights / suggestions whether NUTCH-240
> and/or NUTCH-61 should be included in this release?
NUTCH-240 : I really like the idea, but for now, I agree with that is API is
still "ugly". I would like to help in the next weeks...
So for me it should not be included
Hi Andrzej,
On 4/7/06 12:18 PM, "Andrzej Bialecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you guys have any additional insights / suggestions whether NUTCH-240
> and/or NUTCH-61 should be included in this release?
Looking at the JIRA popular issues pane for Nutch (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Doug Cutting wrote:
Chris Mattmann wrote:
+1 for a release sooner rather than later.
I think this is a good plan. There's no reason we can't do another
release in a month. If it is back-compatbible we can call it 0.8.x
and if it's incompatible we can call it 0.9.0.
I'm going to make a Ha
Doug Cutting wrote:
Piotr, would you like to make this release, or should I?
I would prefer you would do it this time - I am not sure if I can find
some time next week. I would like to do some things before release though:
1) Commit clustering patch from Dawid (I took it over from Andrzej).
2
+1
On 4/7/06 10:20 AM, "Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Mattmann wrote:
>> +1 for a release sooner rather than later.
>
> I think this is a good plan. There's no reason we can't do another
> release in a month. If it is back-compatbible we can call it 0.8.x and
> if it's inco
Chris Mattmann wrote:
+1 for a release sooner rather than later.
I think this is a good plan. There's no reason we can't do another
release in a month. If it is back-compatbible we can call it 0.8.x and
if it's incompatible we can call it 0.9.0.
I'm going to make a Hadoop 0.1.1 release to
Dawid Weiss wrote:
Could we have the clustering patch applied before the 0.8.0 release? I
know you're way busy with other things, Andrzej, maybe you'll forward
it to somebody else? It shouldn't be a difficult patch to review and
apply.
No problem, I will take care of it before the release.
Could we have the clustering patch applied before the 0.8.0 release? I
know you're way busy with other things, Andrzej, maybe you'll forward it
to somebody else? It shouldn't be a difficult patch to review and apply.
D.
Doug Cutting wrote:
TDLN wrote:
I mean, how do others keep uptodate wi
+1 for a release sooner rather than later. Several interesting features
contributed since the 0.7 branch I believe are now tested and
production-worthy, at least in my environment. Hats off to the folks who
were able to split the MapReduce and NDFS into Hadoop -- I'm going to be
experimenting with
Doug Cutting wrote:
TDLN wrote:
I mean, how do others keep uptodate with the main codeline? Do you
advice updating everyday?
Should we make a 0.8.0 release soon? What features are still missing
that we'd like to get into this release?
I think we should make a release soon - instabilities r
TDLN wrote:
I mean, how do others keep uptodate with the main codeline? Do you
advice updating everyday?
Should we make a 0.8.0 release soon? What features are still missing
that we'd like to get into this release?
Doug
12 matches
Mail list logo
