Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth2 and clients without browsers

2011-07-27 Thread Andrew Arnott
Yes, thank you. I'm glad there's already a spec for this. -- Andrew Arnott "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Marius Scurtescu wrote: > I think you are describing the device profil

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth2 and clients without browsers

2011-07-26 Thread Marius Scurtescu
I think you are describing the device profile: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-device-00 Is that correct? Marius On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Arnott wrote: > Trying a different DL... > -- > Andrew Arnott > "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll de

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth2 and clients without browsers

2011-07-26 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
I believe Google is working on a proposal for an oob URI value to use as the redirection URI. EHL On Jul 26, 2011, at 9:18, "Andrew Arnott" mailto:andrewarn...@gmail.com>> wrote: Trying a different DL... -- Andrew Arnott "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the dea

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth2 and clients without browsers

2011-07-26 Thread Andrew Arnott
Trying a different DL... -- Andrew Arnott "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Andrew Arnott wrote: > The recent OAuth 2 specs seem to omit the scenario of a client that cannot > hos