Yes, thank you. I'm glad there's already a spec for this.
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death
your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Marius Scurtescu wrote:
> I think you are describing the device profil
I think you are describing the device profile:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-device-00
Is that correct?
Marius
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Arnott wrote:
> Trying a different DL...
> --
> Andrew Arnott
> "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll de
I believe Google is working on a proposal for an oob URI value to use as the
redirection URI.
EHL
On Jul 26, 2011, at 9:18, "Andrew Arnott"
mailto:andrewarn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Trying a different DL...
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the dea
Trying a different DL...
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death
your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Andrew Arnott wrote:
> The recent OAuth 2 specs seem to omit the scenario of a client that cannot
> hos