Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

On 26.10.2012, at 20:37, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > On 26 October 2012 14:16, Lukas Reichlin > wrote: >> On 26.10.2012, at 20:01, Carnë Draug wrote: > >>> A new release candidate >>> http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.95.tar.gz >>>

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

On 26.10.2012, at 20:01, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 25 October 2012 01:24, Carnë Draug wrote: >> On 12 October 2012 09:53, Kris Thielemans >> wrote: On 6 October 2012 20:17, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 1 October 2012 17:34, Kris Thielemans wrote: >> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Herm

[OctDev] [bug #37622] rlocus doing wrong root locus if there are 4 arguments in function

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #37622 (project octave): Hi Sérgio Thanks for your useful report. I couldn't locate the bug until now. Well, at least it works with one argument :-) Regards, Lukas ___ Reply to this item at:

Re: [OctDev] Instrument control 0.1.0 released [initial release]

On 02.10.2012, at 14:36, Andrius Sutas wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith > wrote: > On 10/02/2012 02:06 AM, Carnë Draug wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > a new package, instrument control by Andrius Sutas, has just been > > released. See the notice at > > http://a

Re: [OctDev] Instrument-control: Documentation and tutorial

On 22.09.2012, at 21:50, JuanPi wrote: > - Would it be possible to have a video with a hardware > application/demonstration? @Lukas (paramaniac): You were also > interested in something like this, right? I wonder whether it's possible to record data from some kind of data acquisition hardware.

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

On 01.10.2012, at 16:06, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > On 1 October 2012 10:01, Lukas Reichlin > wrote: >> >> On 01.10.2012, at 15:46, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> >>> On 1 October 2012 09:43, Lukas Reichlin >>> wrote: >>>> T

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

On 01.10.2012, at 15:46, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > On 1 October 2012 09:43, Lukas Reichlin > wrote: >> There are many warnings and one error, please see below. The C++ compiler is >> clang > [snip] >> bwlabeln.cc:22:10: fatal error: 'unordered

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

On 01.10.2012, at 13:23, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 1 October 2012 12:43, Lukas Reichlin > wrote: >> On 01.10.2012, at 11:01, Carnë Draug wrote: >>> Hi everyone >>> >>> I've been preparing a new release of the image package. There's a lot &

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

On 01.10.2012, at 11:01, Carnë Draug wrote: > Hi everyone > > I've been preparing a new release of the image package. There's a lot > of changes on it, I think enough changes to be version 2.0.0. > > I would be great if people could give it a try and report any problems. > > Thanks, > Carnë >

[OctDev] control-2.4.0 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just sent control-2.4.0 (SVN Revision 11140) to the OctaveForge maintainers. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [1]. Main new feature is the "multiplot" capability for all time and frequency response functions (10 functions in total): bode (sys1

Re: [OctDev] inputname and function(cell{:})

On 15.09.2012, at 16:52, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > Lukas, > > This is just off the top of my head and I didn't look at your code in > detail, but how about using a struct instead of a cell to pass the > arguments and getting the names of the variables with the fieldnames > function? > >

[OctDev] control-2.3.54 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just sent control-2.3.54 (SVN Revision 11031) to the OctaveForge maintainers. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [1]. Main new feature is the "multiplot" capability of frequency domain plotting commands. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge

Re: [OctDev] inputname and function(cell{:})

On 14.09.2012, at 15:46, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > On 14 September 2012 09:30, Lukas Reichlin > wrote: >> Currently, with >> >>ret1 = testfun (arg1, arg2, arg3) >> >> nargin is 3 and inputname ranges from 1 to 3. >> But with >>

[OctDev] inputname and function(cell{:})

Dear Octave Community I'm preparing multiplot-capable plotting functions for the control package. I ran into a problem which boils down to the code in the attached example. I'd like to get the inputnames of all arguments of a function "testfun". Currently, with ret1 = testfun (arg1, ar

[OctDev] Fwd: Application to use SPM ID Toolbox

Begin forwarded message: > From: Lukas Reichlin > Date: 12. September 2012 13:42:25 MESZ > To: Juan Pablo Carbajal > Cc: Brett Ninness > Subject: Re: Application to use SPM ID Toolbox > > Dear Brett, > > Sounds like very good news! :-) > > Regarding Octave i

Re: [OctDev] control 2.3.53 released

On 07.09.2012, at 13:57, marco atzeri wrote: > On 9/7/2012 1:46 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> On 07.09.2012, at 13:37, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >> >>> >>> I built the control package on my Debian system with libblas-dev >>> installed and libatlas3

Re: [OctDev] control 2.3.53 released

On 07.09.2012, at 13:37, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Lukas Reichlin [2012-09-03 12:03]: > >> On 03.09.2012, at 10:39, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >> >>> * Rafael Laboissiere [2012-08-30 23:47]: >>> >>>> * Carnë Draug [2012-08-27 16:43]: >

[OctDev] control 2.3.53 released

On 04.09.2012, at 14:03, marco atzeri wrote: > On 9/3/2012 12:03 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> On 03.09.2012, at 10:39, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, >> >> You can check whether the observed and expected results are equivalent >> state-space mo

Re: [OctDev] control 2.3.53 released

On 03.09.2012, at 12:29, Philip Nienhuis wrote: > PMFJI > > but, uhm.... > > Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> On 03.09.2012, at 10:39, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >> >>> * Rafael Laboissiere [2012-08-30 23:47]: >>> >>>> * Carnë Draug [2012-0

Re: [OctDev] control 2.3.53 released

On 03.09.2012, at 10:39, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Rafael Laboissiere [2012-08-30 23:47]: > >> * Carnë Draug [2012-08-27 16:43]: >> >>> a new release of control package is out, version 2.3.53, by Lukas Reichlin. >> >> In exercising the tests in ins

[OctDev] control-2.3.53 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.3.53 (SVN Revision 10924) to the package release tracker [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ August 27, 2012 control-2.3.53 released Best regards Lukas [1] https

Re: [OctDev] control 2.3.52 - feedback.m checks feedin for feedout

On 27.07.2012, at 21:28, Tony Olivo wrote: > Hello, > > I was playing around learning the control toolbox today, and found > that I couldn't properly set up a feedback system where sys1 had 2 > inputs and 1 output, and sys2 had 1 input and 2 outputs. I would get > the error message: >> error: fe

[OctDev] control-2.3.52 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.3.52 (SVN Revision 10686) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ June 25, 2012 control-2.3.52 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourceforge

Re: [OctDev] problem in solving CARE (continuos algebraic Riccati's equation) for large model

On 17.06.2012, at 23:17, Ido Halperin wrote: > Hello Lukas > > I appreciate your quick reply and I a apologize for the delay in my > response. It took me some time to compile octave. Usually I makes use of > debian binaries. > > a. Relating the results you attached, they seems to me erroneous.

Re: [OctDev] passing linker flags to mkoctfile with better compatibility

On 07.06.2012, at 16:47, Olaf Till wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:08:37AM -0400, Mike Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Olaf Till wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:04:06PM +0200, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >>>> >>>> On 07.06.2012, at

Re: [OctDev] passing linker flags to mkoctfile with better compatibility

On 07.06.2012, at 13:46, Olaf Till wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Olaf Till wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 01:05:49PM +0200, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >>> On 07.06.2012, at 12:27, Olaf Till wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >&g

Re: [OctDev] passing linker flags to mkoctfile with better compatibility

On 07.06.2012, at 12:27, Olaf Till wrote: > Hi, > > recently there was a thread on the Octave Forge list, starting with > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=6379301E-96D0-4AEF-BEEF-3DE7DD81A31F%40gmail.com&forum_name=octave-dev > > continued on the Octave maintainers lis

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

On 05.06.2012, at 11:35, marco atzeri wrote: > On 6/5/2012 11:06 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> On 05.06.2012, at 10:28, marco atzeri wrote: >> >>> On 6/5/2012 7:16 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Marco, Alexander >>>>

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

On 05.06.2012, at 12:06, c. wrote: > > On 5 Jun 2012, at 11:34, Lukas Reichlin wrote: > >> Well, the sign IS relevant. But the two state-space models are equivalent if >> you can find a diagonal transformation matrix T with entries -1 and 1 such >> that >

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

On 05.06.2012, at 07:31, c. wrote: > > On 4 Jun 2012, at 23:56, Thomas Weber wrote: > >> Eh no, not quite. We usually look at the errors and decide. But here we >> are talking about a factor of 1 between expected and actual result. >> That's a bug. > > As far as I understand from Lukas' exp

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

On 05.06.2012, at 10:28, marco atzeri wrote: > On 6/5/2012 7:16 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: > >> >> Marco, Alexander >> >> Could it be that you are using BLAS from ATLAS and LAPACK from Reference >> LAPACK 3.4.1? >> What I meant was using no ATLAS a

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

On 04.06.2012, at 22:46, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/3/12 7:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 6/3/12 3:30 PM, marco atzeri wrote: >>> On 6/3/2012 9:45 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote: Hello, in the changelog among other things I've read the following: " Add a

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

On 04.06.2012, at 19:19, c. wrote: > Lukas, > Thanks for your great work! > > I ran the tests on OSX 10.6 with Apple's vecLib and get the failures below [1] > which you already said should be considered as "no problem". > > On 4 Jun 2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote: >> I expect a package test

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

On 04.06.2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote: > On 6/4/2012 5:37 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> On 03.06.2012, at 21:45, Sergei Steshenko wrote: >> >> >> >> I would not call your ATLAS defective. For various reasons, results from >> ATLAS and Referenc

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

On 03.06.2012, at 21:45, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: Lukas Reichlin >> To: Octave Forge ; Carnë Draug >> >> Cc: help-octave >> Sent: Sunday, June 3, 2012 6:11 PM >> Subject: control-2.3.51 released in package forum - p

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.50 released in package forum - please upload

On 03.06.2012, at 18:40, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > > > > > - Original Message - >> From: Lukas Reichlin >> To: Octave Forge ; Carnë Draug >> >> Cc: help-octave >> Sent: Sunday, June 3, 2012 5:16 PM >> Subject: control-2.3.50 rele

[OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.3.51 (SVN Revision 10559) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ June 3, 2012 control-2.3.51 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourceforge.

[OctDev] control-2.3.50 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.3.51 (SVN Revision 10559) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ June 3, 2012 control-2.3.51 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourceforge.

Re: [OctDev] Problem installing packages

On 29.05.2012, at 07:55, Olaf Till wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:25:30PM +0200, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> ... >> The one the links points to is the one for release. It doesn't come >> with a lapack library. >> ... > > I see ... then someth

Re: [OctDev] Problem installing packages

On 28.05.2012, at 22:33, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 5/28/12 1:25 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> On 28.05.2012, at 19:39, Olaf Till wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:37:24PM +0200, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >>>> ... >>>> >>>>

Re: [OctDev] Problem installing packages

On 28.05.2012, at 19:39, Olaf Till wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:37:24PM +0200, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> ... >> >> Hello, >> >> Could someone please tell me what I should change in the makefile [1] for >> the control package? I think I should

Re: [OctDev] Problem installing packages

On 24.05.2012, at 11:04, marco atzeri wrote: > On 5/24/2012 10:02 AM, Olaf Till wrote: >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:50:14PM +0200, c. wrote: >>> >>> On 23 May 2012, at 19:26, Olaf Till wrote: >>> So I think I'll load up a release tomorrow ... Olaf >>> >>> Please consider applyi

Re: [OctDev] GCC 4.7 compatibility patch

On 30.04.2012, at 01:42, Claudio Freire wrote: > Hi there. > > Here[0] is a patch that makes octave-forge build under gcc 4.7 and > another[1] for openmpi 1.5. > > The patches apply to several modules - if you need it split by module, > let me know. > > The openmpi patch shows undue reliance on

[OctDev] OctaveForge classes

kages: the remaining packages Regards, Lukas Older discussion about the topic: > > On 05.04.2012, at 18:12, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > >> On 5 April 2012 12:01, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >>> Aaah, the Octave Core vs. Octave Forge story. >> >> Yes, I wish w

Re: [OctDev] Removing physicalconstants package

On 23.04.2012, at 22:23, Carnë Draug wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to remove the physicalconstants package. It only has a single > function that returns the constant that is requested. Any suggestion > on where to move it? > > Carnë How about a "legacy" folder (or "outdated" or …) besides the existi

Re: [OctDev] Octave core and Forge

On 05.04.2012, at 18:12, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > On 5 April 2012 12:01, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> Aaah, the Octave Core vs. Octave Forge story. > > Yes, I wish we could fix this organisational issue once and for all. > One of my goals for this GSoC is to improve Savan

Re: [OctDev] quaternion-2.0.0 released in package forum - please upload

On 29.03.2012, at 21:51, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Carnë Draug [2012-03-28 14:40]: > >> On 28 March 2012 04:07, Lukas Reichlin >> wrote: >>> I've just posted quaternion-2.0.0 (SVN Revision 10077) in the package forum >>> [1]. Please upload it

[OctDev] quaternion-2.0.0 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted quaternion-2.0.0 (SVN Revision 10077) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ March 28, 2012 quaternion-2.0.0 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourc

Re: [OctDev] PKG TISEAN

On 25.03.2012, at 16:51, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I am starting the port of the TISEAN package > http://www.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de/~tisean/Tisean_3.0.1/index.html > > I have already a version using the system interface (as explained in > TISEAN for Matlab, but better encapsu

Re: [OctDev] Control systems codes

On 20.03.2012, at 07:24, Ahmadreza Saadatkhah wrote: > Hello, Happy Nowruz > I have the symbolic package, but I don't why it doesn't work. there is a > function "sym" in the link that you send that may work like "syms" in matlab. > anyway I'm working on all codes to fit with Octave. Yes, please

Re: [OctDev] Control systems codes

On 19.03.2012, at 10:52, Ahmadreza Saadatkhah wrote: > I think the bug for non-square system matrix is fixed, I uploaded a new > m-file. in the attachment is an example script. make sure that you add path > or copy MinRMFD.m in matlab path. is necessary that I upload this script too? > thanks >

Re: [OctDev] Control systems codes

On 18.03.2012, at 11:43, Ahmadreza Saadatkhah wrote: > I uploaded the m.file. Thanks! Could you please provide an example m-script that demonstrates the usage of your function? I could not figure it out/get it working. Regards, Lukas ---

Re: [OctDev] Control systems codes

On 14.03.2012, at 11:36, Ahmadreza Saadatkhah wrote: > thanks a lot, > yes I see MIMO codes but I wanted some codes for calculating minimal matrix > fraction description and some other math tools for mimo systems for my work > so I can't find it in this toolbox, if I'm wrong please tell me. > I'

Re: [OctDev] Control systems codes

On 13.03.2012, at 13:44, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Ahmadreza Saadatkhah > wrote: >> I saw the control package before and there aren't codes for MIMO systems, my >> question is how I can upload a file into this package? please answer my >> question. I see http:/

Re: [OctDev] Fwd: Debian packagers want to know

On 12.03.2012, at 20:58, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 12 March 2012 16:17, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> So which packages are a priority? > > I thought the list of most installed packages you sent before was the > basis to decide this. > > This can be compared with the list given in the sourcef

Re: [OctDev] latest control package requires Octave 3.6.0, cannot install to Mac

On 09.03.2012, at 02:40, Aysun Bascetincelik wrote: > Hello, > I'm using Mac OS X 10.7.3 and I am having issues installing the control > package since it requires Octave 3.6.0. Currently from the page looks like > only Octave 3.4.0 is available for Mac users. I looked for the previous > version

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.50 released in package forum - please upload

On 06.03.2012, at 20:48, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 6 March 2012 14:23, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've just posted control-2.3.50 (SVN Revision 9754) in the package forum >> [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS fil

[OctDev] control-2.3.50 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.3.50 (SVN Revision 9754) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The main features are frequency-weighted model and controller order reduction tools as well as cleanup efforts under the hood. The

Re: [OctDev] Bug in octave-forge-control package

On 28.02.2012, at 19:13, Přemysl Vrba wrote: > Greetings, Hi Přemysl, Thanks for your report. I forwarded it to the octave mailing lists (Octave and OctaveForge) as it not only concerns me in my role as the maintainer of the control package. Please keep the mailing lists in Cc for future reque

Re: [OctDev] Control: 3.6.1 warning

On 28.02.2012, at 16:02, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > Hi, > > Octave 3.6.1 is giving warnings about polyderiv being used. I run a > grep -r in the repository and found several uses. > I acted upon package signal, geometry and mechanics. > > I did not touch control or control-legacy > > Here are

Re: [OctDev] Signal: missing functions, poor docs

On 24.02.2012, at 10:25, Jerry wrote: > I am an occasional user of Octave but yet it is an essential part of my work. > > I have investigated using some features in the Signal package and am either > badly ignorant of what is supposed to happen or there are some major problems > with it. A casu

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

On 18.02.2012, at 20:40, Martin Helm wrote: > Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2012, 19:10:09 schrieb Lukas Reichlin: >> On 16.02.2012, at 14:03, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >>> On 14.02.2012, at 23:15, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >>>> Note that I think we should also

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

On 16.02.2012, at 14:03, Lukas Reichlin wrote: > On 14.02.2012, at 23:15, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > >> Note that I think we should also consider Octave-Forge projects. >> Please add Octave-Forge projects to the wiki as you deem appropriate. > > Hi Jordi >

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

On 16.02.2012, at 14:28, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > Hi, Lukas. > > 2012/2/16 Lukas Reichlin : >> On 14.02.2012, at 23:15, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> >>> Note that I think we should also consider Octave-Forge projects. >>> Please add Octave

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

On 14.02.2012, at 23:15, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > Note that I think we should also consider Octave-Forge projects. > Please add Octave-Forge projects to the wiki as you deem appropriate. Hi Jordi I do have an idea for an Octave-Forge project: Improve the "symbolic" package: - use objects

[OctDev] control-2.2.5 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.2.5 (SVN Revision 9600) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ February 9, 2012 control-2.2.5 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourceforge

Re: [OctDev] New package contribution

On 03.02.2012, at 11:50, Moreno Marzolla wrote: > On 02/02/2012 07:51 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> Hi Moreno >> >> Thank you very much for your valuable work. I think your package >> should go to the "main" section as it follows octave conventions >&g

Re: [OctDev] New package contribution

Hi Moreno Thank you very much for your valuable work. I think your package should go to the "main" section as it follows octave conventions nicely. I can't give you svn access (but Carnë can), but I can add the package for you if you want. Best regards Lukas On 02.02.2012, at 17:07, Moreno Ma

[OctDev] [bug #35360] margin.m error: `Ts' undefined near line 300 column 62 for discrete systems

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #35360 (project octave): Thanks for reporting, Renato. I fixed the problem in svn revision 9561. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

Re: [OctDev] PKG release: signal 1.1.2

On 18.01.2012, at 12:58, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 17 January 2012 22:58, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Package signal 1.1.2 uploaded to forum. >> https://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/octave/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1 >> >> NEWS >> http://octave.svn.sf.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main

[OctDev] control-2.2.4 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.2.4 (SVN Revision 9507) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ January 7, 2012 control-2.2.4 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourceforge.

[OctDev] [bug #35245] tf2zp and zp2tf missing in control-2.2.3

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #35245 (project octave): I added the wrappers ss2tf, ss2zp, tf2ss, tf2zp, zp2ss and zp2tf to the signal package. Timothy is not the first guy who requested these functions. What about a release of signal-1.1.2? In the meantime, the updated signal package is available fro

[OctDev] [bug #35245] tf2zp and zp2tf missing in control-2.2.3

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #35245 (project octave): tf2zp, zp2tf and about a dozen of similar x2y commands are part of Matlab's Signal Processing Toolbox: http://www.mathworks.ch/help/toolbox/signal/ref/f9-131178c.html Therefore I won't add them to the Octave control package. If you need them, you

[OctDev] [bug #35245] tf2zp and zp2tf missing in control-2.2.3

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #35245 (project octave): The function "bilinear" is part of the "signal" package. If you want to use the control package instead, you can do the following: octave:1> sysc = tf ([1, 0], [1, 1.4e6]) Transfer function 'sysc' from input 'u1' to output ... s

Re: [OctDev] [bug #35245] tf2zp and zp2tf missing in control-2.2.3

>> The functions tf2zp and zp2tf are missing in the package: >> "control-2.2.3.tar.gz" >> >> I found this when I tried to use the bilinear transformation >> >> [ zb, za ] = bilinear( [ 1 0 ], [ 1 1.4e6 ], 1e-6 ) >> >> They were available in control-1.0.11 >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> T

Re: [OctDev] optim-1.0.17 patch for undefined symbols

On 28.12.2011, at 12:43, marco atzeri wrote: > on latest octave 3.5.91+ all the libraries are not exported anymore > so the build of optim on cygwin fails. > > attached patch solve the issue and link to LAPACK > > Tests needed on mingw and Mac OS X > > Regards > Marco Hi Marco Since optim's m

Re: [OctDev] control-2.2.3 patch for undefined symbols

On 28.12.2011, at 14:41, Lukas Reichlin wrote: > On 28.12.2011, at 14:29, marco atzeri wrote: > >> On 12/28/2011 2:11 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Marco >>> >>> Thank you very much for your help. I applied the patch: >>&g

Re: [OctDev] control-2.2.3 patch for undefined symbols

On 28.12.2011, at 14:29, marco atzeri wrote: > On 12/28/2011 2:11 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: > >> >> Hi Marco >> >> Thank you very much for your help. I applied the patch: >> http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/control/sr

Re: [OctDev] control-2.2.3 patch for undefined symbols

On 28.12.2011, at 12:05, marco atzeri wrote: > On 12/7/2011 5:13 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've just posted control-2.2.3 (SVN Revision 9303) in the package forum [1]. >> Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2

Re: [OctDev] File to release packages

On 21.12.2011, at 13:28, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > Hi all, > > I created this script that helps releasing a package for Octave forge. > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3463348&group_id=2888&atid=352888 > > It can optionally use carandraug inputParser if it is in the Octave pa

[OctDev] control-2.2.3 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.2.3 (SVN Revision 9303) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ December 7, 2011 control-2.2.3 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourceforge

[OctDev] control-2.2.2 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.2.2 (SVN Revision 9260) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ December 4, 2011 control-2.2.2 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourceforge

Re: [OctDev] location of NEWS file in packages for octave >= 3.6

On 25.11.2011, at 11:44, Olaf Till wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:21:41PM +, Carnë Draug wrote: >> On 24 November 2011 18:13, Olaf Till wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:33:25PM +, Carnė Draug wrote: >>>> On 24 November 2011 13:14, Lukas Reichlin

Re: [OctDev] location of NEWS file in packages for octave >= 3.6

On 24.11.2011, at 13:53, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 24 November 2011 08:07, Lukas Reichlin wrote: >> On 20.11.2011, at 22:11, Carnë Draug wrote: >>> 2011/11/20 Lukas Reichlin : >>>> On 20.11.2011, at 21:11, Carnë Draug wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi

Re: [OctDev] location of NEWS file in packages for octave >= 3.6

On 20.11.2011, at 22:11, Carnë Draug wrote: > 2011/11/20 Lukas Reichlin : >> On 20.11.2011, at 21:11, Carnë Draug wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> a recent change in octave core (in pkg.m and news.m) will allows users >>> to read the NE

Re: [OctDev] Control Package

On 23.11.2011, at 13:04, Alexandre Felipe wrote: > version > ans = 3.2.4 > pkg list: > control *| 1.0.11 | /usr/share/octave/packages/3.2/control-1.0.11 > > i am installing the octave again. > > Both your octave and control package versions are *very* outdated. The current octave v

Re: [OctDev] Control Package

On 23.11.2011, at 03:02, Alexandre Felipe wrote: > Yes, my first name is Alexandre > > Thanks, i hope that it can be included, if you have some ideas to implement > in octave files let me know, (my mkoctfile never worked) > > Now i have seen "place.m". It doesn't support multiple inputs, i stil

Re: [OctDev] Control Package

On 22.11.2011, at 20:27, Alexandre Felipe wrote: > Hi lukas, > > I've uploaded the three files mentioned as i said i have used them to my > discipline control systems so it is shortly tested. But perhaps it is good to > test them more effectively. > > Do you have the background for the implem

Re: [OctDev] Control Package

On 22.11.2011, at 07:21, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Alexandre Felipe > wrote: >> Hello, My name is Alexandre Felipe (as my e-mail address shows) >> i am studying state space representation for control systems this half >> in our lessons we were using MATLAB i in

Re: [OctDev] location of NEWS file in packages for octave >= 3.6

On 20.11.2011, at 21:11, Carnë Draug wrote: > Hi everyone, > > a recent change in octave core (in pkg.m and news.m) will allows users > to read the NEWS file of packages from the octave prompt too. For > example, news("signal") would show the NEWS from the signal package > instead of the core NEW

Re: [OctDev] Quaternions

On 03.11.2011, at 13:32, JuanPi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Lukas Reichlin > wrote: >> On 03.11.2011, at 12:00, JuanPi wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Lukas Reichlin >>> wrote: >>>> On 03.11.2011, at 10:28, JuanPi wr

Re: [OctDev] Quaternions

On 03.11.2011, at 12:00, JuanPi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Lukas Reichlin > wrote: >> On 03.11.2011, at 10:28, JuanPi wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In mid January 2012 I will start porting the Robotics Toolbox >>> (http://peterc

Re: [OctDev] Quaternions

On 03.11.2011, at 10:28, JuanPi wrote: > Hi, > > In mid January 2012 I will start porting the Robotics Toolbox > (http://petercorke.com/Robotics_Toolbox.html) to Octave. > However I will break it in several packages since some functions are > already available and in some cases with better perfor

[OctDev] control-2.2.1 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.2.1 (SVN Revision 8848) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ October 24, 2011 control-2.2.1 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourceforge

[OctDev] control-2.2.0 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.2.0 (SVN Revision 8602) in the package forum [1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ September 26, 2011 control-2.2.0 released Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourcefor

Re: [OctDev] installing a dev package

On 08.09.2011, at 23:59, Jordi Burguet Castell wrote: > Hi Lukas, > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Lukas Reichlin > wrote: >> On 08.09.2011, at 18:03, Jordi Burguet Castell wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I finished compiling and installing o

Re: [OctDev] installing a dev package

On 08.09.2011, at 18:03, Jordi Burguet Castell wrote: > Hi, > > I finished compiling and installing octave from svn (3.5.0+), but now > I can't figure out how to install the packages from octave-forge that > I also got from their svn repository. > > Things I've tried: > > * octave-forge/main/co

[OctDev] control-2.1.55 released in package forum - please upload

Hi all, I've just posted control-2.1.55 (SVN Revision 8508) in the package forum [1]. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2]. The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ September 7, 2011 New release of the package: control-2.1.55 Best regards Lukas [1] http://sourceforge.net/apps/p

Re: [OctDev] differences with matlab in control package

On 06.09.2011, at 16:20, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > Hola. :-) > > On 6 September 2011 07:58, Jordi Burguet Castell > wrote: >> There are a few differences from matlab in the behavior of the control >> package, that bite me when running some codes. I don't know if they >> exist by design or

Re: [OctDev] differences with matlab in control package

On 06.09.2011, at 14:58, Jordi Burguet Castell wrote: > Hi, > > There are a few differences from matlab in the behavior of the control > package, that bite me when running some codes. I don't know if they > exist by design or it would be nice to make them disappear. For > example, > * There is no

  1   2   >