tir, 16 06 2009 kl. 04:50 -0500, skrev dmelliott:
> O.K., let's give this a try. The demo is changed. See if it is O.K.,
> if you would (works on my Pentium II).
This looks fine to me, although you should use '%!demo' rather than '%!
test' -- the latter is for unit testing, whereas '%!demo
lør, 13 06 2009 kl. 21:48 -0500, skrev dmelliott:
> Please feel more than free to bring up any issue of compliance.
> Learning how to do this was my goal for this submission. Having been, among
> many other things, a QA Manager, I am quite sensitive to document control,
> and understand the
Yours truly,
dmelliott
- Original Message -
From: Søren Hauberg
To: dmelliott
Cc: octave-...@lists.sf.net
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [OctDev] Developer Regi
lør, 13 06 2009 kl. 07:31 -0500, skrev dmelliott:
> Is this guy ever going to get it right?
:-)
I'm sorry to keep bringing up small issues -- I truly hope this doesn't
scare you from contributing. That being said I have three comments
1) In the license you write: "This file is distributed with O
tegrate it.
dmelliott
- Original Message -
From: Carlo de Falco
To: dmelliott
Cc: Søren Hauberg ; octave-...@lists.sf.net
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: [OctDev] Developer Re
Delay here too; new work station to set up. If MS put in any more helps,
the thing wouldn't work at all.
- Original Message -
From: Søren Hauberg
To: dmelliott
Cc: octave-...@lists.sf.net
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 4:51 AM
Subject: Re: [OctDev] Developer Registration Request
On 7 Jun 2009, at 00:25, dmelliott wrote:
Dear Mr. de Falco,
While it does not have a singularity on the path of
integration, it does at x = +/- i/5. Thus the radius of
convergence, from zero, interferes with the construction
of a polynomial approximation therefrom. This is also
early ca
ke this and any other changes necessary to achieve
> standard practice conformance.
>
> dmelliott
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Søren Hauberg
> To: dmelliott
> Cc: octave-...@lists.sf.net
> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [
Cc: octave-...@lists.sf.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [OctDev] Developer Registration Request
tir, 02 06 2009 kl. 14:12 -0500, skrev dmelliott:
> The idea of this routine is that it integrates existing data in its
> most
> ususal form. That is, it does n
-...@lists.sf.net
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: [OctDev] Developer Registration Request
On 4 Jun 2009, at 06:12, dmelliott wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>Thank you very much for giving this your consideration.
>
>Both the below and a comment by Mr. Hauberg
Dear Søren,
An example that is more often used for this kind of thing is that of
fractional
powers of x on (0,1). These do not have a Maclaurin series due to the
infinite
derivatives at x=0.
Taking f=x^((2*n+1)/2), for n=0 both methods do quite poorly, needing
~10,000 points to achie
s, John Todd editor, McGraw-Hill
> Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Abramowitz and Stegun editors,
> National Bureau of Standards
> etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Carlo de Falco
> To: dmelliott
> Cc: Søren Hauberg ; octave-...@lists.
z and Stegun editors,
National Bureau of Standards
etc.
- Original Message -
From: Carlo de Falco
To: dmelliott
Cc: Søren Hauberg ; octave-...@lists.sf.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [OctDev] Developer Registration Request
On 2 Jun 2009, at 21:1
On 2 Jun 2009, at 22:15, Carlo de Falco wrote:
>
> On 2 Jun 2009, at 21:12, dmelliott wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear Søren,
>>
>> More thoughts:
>>
>>
>> The idea of this routine is that it integrates existing data in
>> its most
>> ususal form. That is, it does not need a function to call, and,
>>
On 2 Jun 2009, at 21:12, dmelliott wrote:
>
> Dear Søren,
>
>More thoughts:
>
>
>The idea of this routine is that it integrates existing data in
> its most
> ususal form. That is, it does not need a function to call, and,
> since, for
> better or for worse, most data comes on a domai
tir, 02 06 2009 kl. 14:12 -0500, skrev dmelliott:
> The idea of this routine is that it integrates existing data in its most
> ususal form. That is, it does not need a function to call, and, since, for
> better or for worse, most data comes on a domain of equally sized steps,
> this is what
Dear Søren,
More thoughts:
The idea of this routine is that it integrates existing data in its most
ususal form. That is, it does not need a function to call, and, since, for
better or for worse, most data comes on a domain of equally sized steps,
this is what it uses. This is an a
Søren Hauberg wrote:
> But as long as no Octave organisation exist I don't think it makes sense
> to assign copyright to it. If you assign copyright to a non-existing
> party then I guess (I'm no lawyer) nobody owns the copyright, which
> sounds like a legal nightmare to me.
Is it not simple enoug
Dear Søren,
More on copyright.
Wikipedia's article on copyright:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright#Obtaining_and_enforcing_copyright
states that in the US, where I am, registering a copyright after a chalange
entitles one to only damages and lost profits. Since I am not going
- Original Message -
From: Søren Hauberg
To: dmelliott ; octave-...@lists.sf.net
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OctDev] Developer Registration Request
Hi
Please remember to reply-to-all such that everybody on the list can take
part in the discussion.
søn, 31 05 2009
Hi
Please remember to reply-to-all such that everybody on the list can take
part in the discussion.
søn, 31 05 2009 kl. 16:49 -0500, skrev dmelliott:
> Dear Mr. Hauberg,
Call me Søren; no need to be formal :-)
> Thank you for your kind consideration.
>
> The package placement decision
fre, 29 05 2009 kl. 22:19 -0500, skrev dmelliott:
[snip]
> These routines are both small and fast.
>
>
> Please find the routines enclosed.
Thanks :-)
I'm no expert in this field, so I'd rather not comment on the actual
functions. Does anybody have any comments on these functions?
Where do you
22 matches
Mail list logo
