Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-24 Thread Denis Kenzior
0 PM >>>> To: ofono@ofono.org >>>> Cc: tomasz.grego...@gmail.com >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status >>>> reporting in AT modem >>>>> After discussing internally with Fred Joly I would like to come

Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-24 Thread Arun Ravindran
Hi Denis, -Original Message- From: ofono-boun...@ofono.org [mailto:ofono-boun...@ofono.org] On Behalf Of Denis Kenzior Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:50 PM To: ofono@ofono.org Cc: tomasz.grego...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting

Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-23 Thread Denis Kenzior
org >> Cc: tomasz.grego...@gmail.com >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status >> reporting in AT modem >>> After discussing internally with Fred Joly I would like to come back >> on the 4 properties : >>> - Suspended is applica

RE: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-23 Thread Joly, Frederic
Hi Denis, > -Original Message- > From: ofono-boun...@ofono.org [mailto:ofono-boun...@ofono.org] On > Behalf Of Denis Kenzior > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:50 PM > To: ofono@ofono.org > Cc: tomasz.grego...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG su

Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-23 Thread Denis Kenzior
Hi Redouane, On 02/23/2011 10:36 AM, Soum, RedouaneX wrote: > Hi Denis, > > >>> In my opinion, combined gprs atom would be easier to do and probably >>> enough, separate atoms would be more "looking into the future" like >>> but I am not sure if this division is necessary. >> >> Looking at the

RE: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-23 Thread Soum, RedouaneX
Hi Denis, >> In my opinion, combined gprs atom would be easier to do and probably >> enough, separate atoms would be more "looking into the future" like >> but I am not sure if this division is necessary. > >Looking at the current ConnectionManager API, none of the properties >(Powered, Attach

Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-23 Thread Denis Kenzior
Hi Tomasz, > Common gprs atom would be able to handle all situation: 3G only, 3G / > LTE, LTE only, > marking technology in Bearer property. Though it might be difficult to > handle double > registration of 3G and LTE at the same time for mix modems, if this is > allowed. > > 3G only stuff in gpr

Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-23 Thread Tomasz Gregorek
Hi Denis 2011/2/22 Denis Kenzior > Hi, > > On 02/22/2011 10:08 AM, Soum, RedouaneX wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > > >>> I agree with you , both bearers are almost similar.Minor difference i > >>> see are context managment (especially default context creation) and > some > >>> eps related spill over

Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-22 Thread Denis Kenzior
Hi, On 02/22/2011 10:08 AM, Soum, RedouaneX wrote: > Hi guys, > > >>> I agree with you , both bearers are almost similar.Minor difference i >>> see are context managment (especially default context creation) and some >>> eps related spill over on other existing atoms (For ex SIM would not >>> co

RE: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-22 Thread Soum, RedouaneX
Hi guys, >>I agree with you , both bearers are almost similar.Minor difference i >>see are context managment (especially default context creation) and some >>eps related spill over on other existing atoms (For ex SIM would not >>contain some ISIM (IMPU/IMPI)related stuff).My idea is seperate atom

Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-22 Thread Tomasz Gregorek
2011/2/22 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tomasz Gregorek [mailto:tomasz.grego...@gmail.com] > > Sent: 22 February 2011 16:09 > > To: ofono@ofono.org > > Cc: Nayani Vijay > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network &

RE: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-22 Thread Vijay.Nayani
> -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Gregorek [mailto:tomasz.grego...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 February 2011 16:09 > To: ofono@ofono.org > Cc: Nayani Vijay > Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network > status reporting in AT modem > >

Re: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-22 Thread Tomasz Gregorek
Hi Vijay 2011/2/22 > > > > Subject: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network > > status reporting in AT modem > > > > [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status > > reporting in AT modem Tomasz Gregorek tomasz.gregorek at > &

RE: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-22 Thread Vijay.Nayani
> Subject: [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network > status reporting in AT modem > > [PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status > reporting in AT modem Tomasz Gregorek tomasz.gregorek at > gmail.com Thu Feb 17 19:52:45 PST 2011 > > * Prev

[PATCH] atmodem: CEREG support for LTE network status reporting in AT modem

2011-02-17 Thread Tomasz Gregorek
From: Tomasz Gregorek This is a proposal for CEREG support based on the AT modem. Support in driver should work, though I have an issue with the core. The core has one gprs status currently. In case of having second status for LTE, there is need of having two satuses, one for each, 3G and LTE, o