RE: [RFC 1/5] gprs: Update documentation for IPv6

2011-01-28 Thread Mika.Liljeberg
Hi Marcel, > I am not sure it is a good idea to make ConnMan do that. Why is that? > And to be honest for PPP, just doing IPv4 seems acceptable > since PPP is > bad idea in the first place. It is a limitation I am willing > to accept. Yeah, PPP is not really a requirement for us, although it

RE: [RFC 1/5] gprs: Update documentation for IPv6

2011-01-28 Thread Mika.Liljeberg
Hi Marcel, > Hi Mika, > > > > I am not sure it is a good idea to make ConnMan do that. > > > > Why is that? > > we need to chat with Samuel about this. I foresee a bunch of issues > trying to handle two context properly. This needs a bit more deeper > thinking on how things are done. Ok. But

RE: [RFC 1/5] gprs: Update documentation for IPv6

2011-01-28 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Mika, > > I am not sure it is a good idea to make ConnMan do that. > > Why is that? we need to chat with Samuel about this. I foresee a bunch of issues trying to handle two context properly. This needs a bit more deeper thinking on how things are done. > > And to be honest for PPP, just doin

Re: [RFC 1/5] gprs: Update documentation for IPv6

2011-01-28 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
On Friday 28 January 2011 16:17:04 ext Marcel Holtmann, you wrote: > I am not sure it is a good idea to make ConnMan do that. For IFX, I was > actually considering just piping the two RawIP streams into one network > interface. That seems easy enough. > > And to be honest for PPP, just doing IPv4

Re: [RFC 1/5] gprs: Update documentation for IPv6

2011-01-28 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
On Friday 28 January 2011 14:49:16 ext Sjur Brændeland, you wrote: > I think it would be nice if we could keep only one interface here. > It's a bit messy that the difference between R7 and R8 > networks will be visible to the users like this. > > So when in a R7 network the uplink traffic should

RE: [RFC 1/5] gprs: Update documentation for IPv6

2011-01-28 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Mika, > > > + For combined IPv4v6 context (3GPP rel 8) the > > > + same network interface may be used for both > > > + IPv4 and IPv6. IPv4 and IPv6 may also be > > > + offered via separate network interfaces. > > > + > > > > I think it would be nice if we could keep only one interface

RE: [RFC 1/5] gprs: Update documentation for IPv6

2011-01-28 Thread Mika.Liljeberg
Hi Sjur, > > +   For combined IPv4v6 context (3GPP rel 8) the > > +   same network interface may be used for both > > +   IPv4 and IPv6. IPv4 and IPv6 may also be > > +   offered via separate network interfaces. > > + > > I think it would be nice if we could keep only one interface here. > It's a

Re: [RFC 1/5] gprs: Update documentation for IPv6

2011-01-28 Thread Sjur Brændeland
Hi, > +               dict IPv6Settings [readonly, optional] > + > +                       Holds all the IPv6 network settings. > + > +                       string Interface [readonly, optional] > + > +                               Holds the name of the IPv6 network interface > +