On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 08:37 AM, woodelf wrote:
I wasn't actually addressing your particular product, just the blanket
statement that merely avoiding the stated definition will keep you
safe.
Right. Understood.
*If* Ryan is correct and WotC is still following that opinion, and
lots
On 11 Aug 2003 09:15:02 -0700
"Ryan S. Dancey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 15:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Personally, I don't think those restrictions are worth WotC's
> > time anymore
>
> Me neither, but I suspect our opinions are diametrically opposed to
> the cur
On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 07:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I studied that
puppy very close before deciding to make my product a commercial
venture, as should anyone. My conclusion is that I am very safe.
Define very safe...
By "very safe" I mean I within the boundaries set by the d20 STL.
On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 02:51 PM, DarkTouch wrote:
Something like saying:
Character Creation rules include those rules that would assaign a
point cost to X?
Right, which is pretty much what I said.
In the past Wizards has gotten as specific as saying "you can't put
the phrase 'Core rule
On Saturday, August 9, 2003, at 03:14 PM, woodelf wrote:
The d20 STL is actually very specific about what it means by
"character creation" and if you word things carefully, you can
actually put a lot of character creation stuff in a product. I am
working on a product whose entire point is chara
In a message dated 8/10/03 4:27:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I studied that
puppy very close before deciding to make my product a commercial
venture, as should anyone. My conclusion is that I am very safe.
Define very safe... You might end up with a finished product
Something like saying:
Character Creation rules include those rules that would assaign a point
cost to X?
In the past Wizards has gotten as specific as saying "you can't put the
phrase 'Core rulebook' on the cover of your product" because people were
doing it. If people are doing it and it goes
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Leroy Van Camp III wrote:
> > *If* Ryan is correct and WotC is still following that opinion, and
> > lots of products start showing up that describe chargen in other ways
> > (such as through point builds), they'll just change the license.
> > Unlike the WotC OGL, they c
At 18:52 -0600 8/9/03, Leroy Van Camp III wrote:
On Saturday, August 9, 2003, at 03:14 PM, woodelf wrote:
Has it ever been established for certain whether the description of
character creation in the D20STL is definitive or exemplary? I
don't think there's ever been an official pronouncement fr
At 13:21 -0600 8/9/03, Leroy Van Camp III wrote:
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 09:44 AM, The LE wrote:
I wish to make a product that is D20 compatable, with character
creation guidlines... thefore violating the D20 license. I realize
I would have to release this book without the D20 logo.
What k
> From: DarkTouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> You might try checking into the Prometheus Gaming System..
> I'm not sure where they are.
We're "paused."
>> last time I checked in with their web site though, it looked as
>> though WotC had successfully derailed them by including them
>>
You might try checking into the Prometheus Gaming System.. I'm not sure
where they are. Originally, I seem to remember them creating their own
version of the SRD and having a logo to attach to it.. last time I
checked in with their web site though, it looked as though WotC had
successfully dera
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 15:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Personally, I don't think those restrictions are worth WotC's time
> anymore
Me neither, but I suspect our opinions are diametrically opposed to the
current decisionmakers.
Ryan
___
Ogf-l mailin
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 09:44 AM, The LE wrote:
I wish to make a product that is D20 compatable, with character
creation guidlines... thefore violating the D20 license. I realize I
would have to release this book without the D20 logo.
What kind of character creation guidelines are you look
Of course, the D20 STL is a very flexible document and any percieved
loopholes will more than likely get fixed right up in the next version.
Leroy Van Camp III wrote:
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 09:44 AM, The LE wrote:
I wish to make a product that is D20 compatable, with character
creation
15 matches
Mail list logo
