Jon Tibble wrote:
> Project OpenIndiana is pleased to announce the next development
> release, oi_148, is available.
> Existing users can image-update from their current repositories.
> Images of various formats (dd-usb to follow shortly) are available here:
> http://openindiana.org/download/
Hi, t
Virtualbox is not
recognizing oi_ but expects snv_ version of the OS. Any workarounds?
Also How to update FF/TB, etc, before new /dev OI release?
Should we not have some kind of service publisher for dev releases?
Nikola M.
When first dev release with Illumos bits will be there
I experience X server (and keyboard I think) locking at sort of random
times (switching virtual desktop, opening firefox, opening thunderbird etc).
I think All applications could stay working while screen picture freezes
and I could always log in via ssh to the machine.
Machine is Notebook Dell La
On 03/21/11 12:54 PM, Andrey Sokolov wrote:
Hi Deano,
I would like to write a program that will convert linux binaries to
opensolaris binaries. The program will change dynamic relocation
records. I did a little experiment:
http://forum.os-solaris.ru/index.php?topic=223.0 I have converted a
s
On 03/21/11 02:53 PM, Nikola M. wrote:
On 03/21/11 12:54 PM, Andrey Sokolov wrote:
Hi Deano,
I would like to write a program that will convert linux binaries to
opensolaris binaries. The program will change dynamic relocation
records. I did a little experiment:
http://forum.os-solaris.ru
On 03/28/11 04:26 PM, Shawn Thompson wrote:
> But anyway, how old is Nimbus any way? I think we're due for a new
> theme, I also find the engine to be very inflexible, I swear most of the
> resources are pixmaps.
Someone using Linux told me some time ago that colors and theme on
OpenSolaris and n
On 03/29/11 03:54 PM, Shawn Thompson wrote:
> I was thinking that maybe we could evolve from Nimbus somehow. Somehow
> keeping elements/ideas from it, but applying them in new ways. I was
> looking at that Murrine engine, it has a lot of options, and I mean a
> lot. And don't forget, if we do chang
On 06/06/11 19:17, Gordon Ross wrote:
> Sometimes I prefer to develop new code outside of an "OS/Net"-style gate
> (like the illumos gate) because (a) it eliminates the merge work otherwise
> needed to keep up with the upstream, and (b) builds are very much faster
> because you're only building you
Andrzej Szeszo wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Text-install test ISO is available here:
>
> http://dlc-int.openindiana.org/151a/oi-dev-151a-text-x86-20110908-1.iso
>
> Andrzej
>
> On 08/09/2011 18:00, Andrzej Szeszo wrote:
>> Text-install test ISO will be available in couple hours.
Thanks,
SHA1SUM is also nice
On 08/29/12 03:18 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Dear OI Developers,
It is with much sadness that I hereby resign as project lead. I may,
if the situation improves
Thank you for Alasdair EverCity support and for making Openindiana.
I think we all hope you will continue to be included as extremely
Does someone cares for Mailing lists subjects are too long?
They need their Message subjects containing Bug statuses, cut-off,
from [List-name] [OpenIndiana Distribution - Bug #] (Bugstatus)*
*to [List-name][OI-dBug#](Bugstatus)
so they could even try to fit on the screen in the mail
On 12/ 2/12 09:37 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
for many last weeks I have been working on fresh JDS build in my spare
time, small mix of OI, Solaris and even newer bits. If somebody is
interested in the current status, you can see temporary repo here:
http://opensolaris.cz:1/
It should be po
On 12/ 3/12 02:20 PM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
> Added your repository (--sticky --search-first), --non-sticky'd the
> openindiana, sfe and sfe-encumbered repositories, and did an update.
>
> output from "pkg update --require-new-be --no-backup-be -nv" attached.
> I'm sure I've done something wrong,
On 12/24/12 02:43 PM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On po, 2012-12-24 at 13:43 +0100, Nikola M. wrote:
>> I also did not managed to update packages to new JDS.
>> How can I help this thing happened?
>> In terms of being active, testing and any contribution?
>> I w
On 12/29/12 10:43 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this problem should be fixed in the current JDS repo.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Milan
I get this messages now.
Maybe it is because of it is OI updated from snv_134.
Maybe I should do fresh install/update?
> $ pfexec pkg publisher >> log.txt
> PUBL
On 12/29/12 10:43 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this problem should be fixed in the current JDS repo.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Milan
Hi Milan :) , thanks for your work on compiling newer OI desktop! :P
Where to report bugs in new JDS,
get code and use building instructions to build it locally?
I h
On 03/16/13 11:40 AM, Nikola M. wrote:
> Where to report bugs in new JDS,
> get code and use building instructions to build it locally?
>
> I have some bugs to report:
> - "/usr/lib/pm-launch /usr/bin/packagemanager" Packagemanager GUI
> shortcut does not work, 'pf
On 05/10/13 02:19 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> more constructive than whinging about it will be to find ways to either a)
> make a commercially viable case for it so people can get paid to work on it,
> or b) lead a volunteer effort to make this work.
I think that without Desktop that is running
On 05/12/13 07:10 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> On May 12, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>
>>
>> I believe, 32-bit should be retained. While it is of little utility
>> for ZFS and other huge-RAM jobs, it may be required for some netbooks,
>> older hardware repurposed for tests and SOHO server
On 05/12/13 07:06 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> We're going to have to support a 32-bit userland for some time to come,
> unfortunately, but we should no longer make that the default, and we should
> deliver all of our system utilities in 64-bit only form, IMO; and we could
> entirely kill off th
On 06/ 3/13 12:50 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Hi OpenSolarians
>
> OpenSXCE2013.05 for x86, x86_64 EA was just RELEASED. Prepping a short
> announcement with the most visible unfixed glitches as short summary.
> SPARC version next days. No estimates anymore.
>
>
> http://svr4.opensxce.org/i386/5.11
nd-team][OIFeature#1233] -> [OI-Userland-Feature#1233]
[Xnv-team] [OpenIndiana Distribution - Bug #3421]
-> [Xnv-team][OIBug#3421] -> [OI-Xnv-Bug#3421]
Shorter-better.
Care to comment?
I think it is important issue.
Nikola M.
___
oi-dev mail
On 06/24/13 01:32 AM, Magnus wrote:
> The change I made would have turned this:
>[Caiman-team] [OpenIndiana Distribution - Bug #2997]
>
> Into this:
>[Caiman][OpenIndiana Distribution - Bug #2997]
>
> Everything beyond "[Caiman]" is coming from the bug tracking system.
>
> I'm not actively
On 06/20/13 01:10 AM, Andrzej Szeszo wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have configured Jenkins job which is continuously building and
> publishing vanilla illumos-gate packages to the /hipster repo.
>
> Jenkins is actually rebuilding this component:
>
> https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/tree/oi/hipste
is Studio 2010/08/13
or one past 12.3 (requires support contract with Oracle) or using GCC.
(Ginn is using Studio).
If you are interested, we can connect and work together in learning how
to build, send and recieve patches, publish in IPS etc.
Nikola M.
OI Hipster,
(illumos-5c069a6) , last two updates have Xchat dumps core /crashing
and X lock have no OI logo.
Oh wait, now also Firefox 22 dumps core . something is wrong here.
(core is 679-692MB). Core from firefox 10.0.12 is ~161MB..
___
oi-dev mailing
On 07/17/13 11:15 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>
>
> Nikola M. писал 17.07.2013 21:47:
>> OI Hipster,
>> (illumos-5c069a6) , last two updates have Xchat dumps core /crashing
>> and X lock have no OI logo.
>
> About xchat - I've tried it. It didn't dump
On 07/17/13 11:15 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>
>
> Nikola M. писал 17.07.2013 21:47:
>> OI Hipster,
>> (illumos-5c069a6) , last two updates have Xchat dumps core /crashing
>> and X lock have no OI logo.
>
> About xchat - I've tried it. It didn't dump
On 07/18/13 05:46 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> Hi, I was just looking around changes in hipster,
>> And then I saw this:
>> "# Copyright (c) 2013 Alexander Pyhalov"
>>
>> (https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/commit/ab3ce40009249e514e51b0af8d2b8fee490c631a)
>>
>> Please remove this from ever
On 07/18/13 06:47 PM, ken mays wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Please update your systems for test and review of Milan Jurik's JDS
> update:
>
> 1. /hipster (>= 07-18-2013 edition)
> 2. JDS (07-15-2013 edition, http://pkg.opensolaris.cz/osol/en/index.shtml)
This is so great, I feel so good knowing that thing
On 07/19/13 11:04 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Good news.
> I was surprised that still none C++ application suffered from studio
> => g++ migration and other changes.
>
> Now we have firefox crashing on start in /hipster.
>
> https://www.illumos.org/issues/3896
>
> Do I understand correctly that
On 07/19/13 11:21 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
> On 19/07/2013 11:04, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>> Good news.
>> I was surprised that still none C++ application suffered from studio =>
>> g++ migration and other changes.
>>
>> Now we have firefox crashing on start in /hipster.
>>
>> https://www.il
On 07/19/13 11:51 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
> On 19/07/2013 11:32, Nikola M. wrote:
>> On 07/19/13 11:21 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
>>> On 19/07/2013 11:04, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>>>> Good news.
>>>> I was surprised that still none C++ appli
On 07/19/13 11:57 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On 2013-07-19 11:51, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
>
Maybe indeed a C++ incompatibility ?
>
>> Welcome to the world of binary incompatiblitly, now the last
>> fortress has finally been conquered.
>
> Which moves me to think: would this example mean th
On 07/19/13 12:06 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 13:57, Jim Klimov wrote:
>> On 2013-07-19 11:51, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
>>
> Maybe indeed a C++ incompatibility ?
>>
>>> Welcome to the world of binary incompatiblitly, now the last
>>> fortress has finally been conquered.
>
On 07/18/13 06:47 PM, ken mays wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Please update your systems for test and review of Milan Jurik's JDS
> update:
>
> 1. /hipster (>= 07-18-2013 edition)
> 2. JDS (07-15-2013 edition, http://pkg.opensolaris.cz/osol/en/index.shtml)
I can't update:
$ pkg publisher
PUBLISHER
On 07/21/13 02:57 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Hello, all.
> I've made a fix to zlib which at least allows firefox 10 (coming with
> hipster) to run locally.
>
> Please, update your systems and test if it works for you.
Hi, updated , starded FF10, cored.
FF22 actually runs but it cores when I tri
On 07/21/13 07:52 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Nikola M. писал 21.07.2013 17:34:
>> On 07/21/13 02:57 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>> Hello, all.
>> I've made a fix to zlib which at least allows firefox 10 (coming with
>> hipster) to run locally.
>>
>>
On 07/21/13 08:17 PM, Nikola M. wrote:
> On 07/21/13 07:52 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>> Nikola M. писал 21.07.2013 17:34:
>>> On 07/21/13 02:57 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>>> Hello, all.
>>> I've made a fix to zlib which at least allows firefox 10
On 07/21/13 03:44 PM, ken mays wrote:
> Nikola,
>
> If you just uninstall zlib 1.2.8 and reinstall zlib 1.2.3, can you retest
> your uploads as well as youtube usage with sound/flash?
>
> Just so we can review the working state on your system at this point
> with /hipster.
>
> ~ Ken Mays
I did not
On 07/22/13 12:32 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
> Okay, I've upgraded to /hipster as of 21-jul ~ 10pm ish
>
> gnome-wm still fails for me ... maybe I'm doing something wrong.
>
> "gnome-wm --replace" in a terminal gives:
>
> gtk-window-decorator: Screen 0 on display ":0.0" already has a
> decoration ma
On 07/19/13 09:28 AM, Nikola M. wrote:
> On 07/18/13 06:47 PM, ken mays wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please update your systems for test and review of Milan Jurik's JDS
>> update:
>>
>> 1. /hipster (>= 07-18-2013 edition)
>> 2. JDS (07-15-201
On 07/22/13 07:00 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On po, 2013-07-22 at 06:31 +0200, Nikola M. wrote:
>> On 07/19/13 09:28 AM, Nikola M. wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/18/13 06:47 PM, ken mays wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>
On 07/22/13 06:25 AM, Nikola M. wrote:
> On 07/22/13 12:32 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
>> Okay, I've upgraded to /hipster as of 21-jul ~ 10pm ish
>>
>> gnome-wm still fails for me ... maybe I'm doing something wrong.
>>
>> "gnome-wm --replace" in
On 07/22/13 09:30 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Hello.
> We have jdk 1.6 only in /hipster. Have someone looked at packaging jdk
> 1.7?
>
> I just would like to know if we can expect it to appear in near
> future? Or it's just better to change JAVA_HOME to JAVA6_HOME in
> shared-macros.mk ?
I insta
On 07/21/13 10:22 PM, a...@sfedu.ru wrote:
> I've tried with FF 10 coming with /hipster and Adobe Flash 10.1r85.3
> (it was a version Jon Tibble advised in oi-discuss).
> It worked, didn't crash, but was extremely slow (tried to watch vimeo
> - it was hardly possible).
> Perhaps, it's related to Vi
On 07/22/13 07:36 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Hello.
> I have updated subversion
> https://github.com/pyhalov/oi-userland/compare/subversion
>
> Two notable things:
> 1) This upgrade removes perl 5.10 subversion component (
> library/perl-5/subversion). subversion component doesn't support perl
ched to it? Could it be catched?
Alo I would like to know do we as illumos and/or OI
have some place "in house" for posting huge files, like core dumps, etc,
to avoid having them displaced all over the internet and having them in
one place for th
ed) and see that important bugs surface on
actual use of updated package and not packaging/dependencies problems etc.
What do you think?
Nikola M.
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On 10/ 9/13 09:05 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
On 10/09/2013 10:55, Nikola M. wrote:
What do you think?
Nikola M.
I think this doesn't work - just not enough users even in /hipster.
Will someone ever use /hipster-testing?
For example. I've just recompiled hp
On 10/ 9/13 01:48 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
I think that every change to public Hipster repo should be tested before
done.
And it goes for every update or group of them, so it could be tested by
one more or few people, before pushing it public.
How about pushing it to hipster-testing publi
On 10/ 9/13 02:55 PM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
I'm a user and not a developer, but what you are saying is wrong.
The hipster was set up to be the bleeding edge for developers to work.
No, I think I am still right. Things should be tested before putted in a
public repo.
People can only be pleased
On 10/ 9/13 08:45 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
On 10/09/2013 20:28, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
I was looking at different php packages.
It seems that currently php-idn upstream is dead.
There are several patches (for example, used in Fedora) which allow it
to be built with php 5.4.
However, some
On 10/11/13 11:38 AM, Laurent Blume wrote:
On 11/10/13 09:39, Nikola M. wrote:
Does this means that Sun Studio / Oracle studio will not be able to run
on Openindiana after this change?
So it is intentional breaking compatibiliy with Studio or including all
software compiled with Studio?
Are
On 10/12/13 10:36 AM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
On 12/10/13 07:06 PM, Nikola M. wrote:
I also don't want *anytime* to be left with an update of Hipster that
just break all everyday apps. (Plus all old apps binary compatibility)
It must be considered with the rest of the apps and people tha
On 10/ 9/13 05:49 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
As I understand it, /usr/g++/ libraries is a temporary solution which
allows us to avoid breaking Sun CC-compiled programs. When we can
rebuild everything with GCC, I think it's a good idea to rename
libraries to original names and move back to /us
On 10/ 9/13 08:10 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
So, we have two loosely related issues to discuss.
On 10/09/2013 21:34, Thomas Wagner wrote:
When we can rebuild
everything with GCC, I think it's a good idea to rename libraries to
original names and move back to /usr.
Yes, true for the ver
On 10/14/13 02:35 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 14/10/2013 14:23, Nikola M. wrote:
...
Just we need to understand, that it is actuall kiss-goodbye to any
binary compatibility of applications for Solaris and OI in the future.
Again, killing binary copmpatibility with commmerial software
IS
On 10/14/13 03:19 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
No, I don't see how a zone should help here, for enterprise locations
like ours where commercial software is an integral part of the
production chain this makes no sense, this is a view of a few
home nas server people who have not used Solaris as t
On 10/16/13 10:48 AM, Bryan N Iotti wrote:
Thank you very much, I'll get down to business ASAP.
Hi Guys
Dave, Bryan, I have granted comment moderation rights to your accounts.
Sorry about the delay. Alasdair is very busy man these days. And I am
quite bad at following mailing list activity..
I
On 11/ 7/13 08:39 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
The most interesting part is that barman has to run rsync with
postgres euid on remote site (to access DB files ) and with barman
euid on local (to access backup files). I think that converting
postgres from role to user is more straightforward t
On 12/13/13 05:55 PM, Jon Tibble wrote:
Hi Richard,
The graphical packages are obsoleted by the new pkg so you need to
pkg uninstall -v package-manager update-manager
Then you can update pkg and you should be able to carry on from there.
JT
What should we use instead fro GUI install and upd
On 01/ 7/14 11:35 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello, people.
After struggling for a week with OpenJDK I think I have something
almost working. Of course, it has bugs, but I don't know much about them.
Does it means there are bugs you recognize, don't know how to fix them,
but posting changes
On 05/23/14 01:57 AM, Adam Števko via oi-dev wrote:
Hi guys,
the issue caused by Yahoo and AOL DMARC policy was solved. If there
are any other problems, just let me know either via email or IRC (xenol).
Shouldn't we see Sender's mail in From: Field,
so we can actually see who is sending what m
Reply 1
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On 05/24/14 04:33 PM, Nikola M. wrote:
Reply 1
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
Reply2 (reply to Reply1): (Same as reply to sender only):
Reply-To:OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
New topic test.
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On 05/24/14 04:41 PM, Nikola M. wrote:
New topic test.
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
Reply to new topic:
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On 05/23/14 02:09 AM, Reginald Beardsley via oi-dev wrote:
May I suggest that the original From: email address be added to the CC list?
That would solve the "How do I email privately?" problem.
Thanks,
Reg
I see that From: consists from 'Name username at password'
Maybe one can replace 'at'
Seems like Yahoo--sent messages,
still suffer from not showing Sender's name in form 'username at host'
in From:field, when sent on list.
but adding just Yahoo's users to Reply to:.
It looks right on Mailing list Archive, but not on list itself:
From: ken mays via openindiana-discuss
Reply-To
On 06/23/14 04:24 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
On 06/23/2014 17:09, Jonathan Adams wrote:
Just out of interest, if illumos-gate was rebuilt every night, does that
mean that we get a complete (Gb sized) update every day, or is it clever
enough to only try to package files that have changed?
No
On 07/22/14 08:13 AM, Alexander Pyhalov via illumos-developer wrote:
On 07/17/2014 23:45, Piotr Jasiukajtis via oi-dev wrote:
Is anyone from OI/hipster here who can speak for their readiness?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:13:45PM +0200
On 07/22/14 05:11 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
ntfs-3g doesn't depend on ntfsprogs.
I'd not heard that GParted wasn't supported on illumos, although I'm
not terribly surprised. These days, dual boot seems to be
infrequently used -- long since supplanted by use of virtualization
technology (whi
On 07/22/14 08:07 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Running illumos on bare metal makes great sense; as a hypervisor, you
want to do that. But that use case is completely at adds with the
idea of running dual boot.
That two things (VMs and dual boot) are not against each other, and I
don't see why sa
On 07/24/14 02:15 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Thank you for your opinions. I didn't think anyone ran configurations like you
describe, but now I know someone does.
My feeling is that your use case is still rather niche at least within this
community. As such I won't tell you what
Sure thing
es in line with continuing from latest /dev.
Maybe general problem is illumos itself not having numbered releases to
have some basis for maintaining patches for some stable version, and
that reflect distributions in a bad way.
--
Nikola M.
___
oi-d
I see that Sender's names on the list, for Yahoo users, are displayed as
''OpenIndiana Developer mailing list" to me, instead of seeing who is
actually sender to the list.
Wasn't that thing supposed to be solved some time ago?
___
oi-dev mailing list
On 09/ 7/14 06:23 PM, Nick Zivkovic wrote:
The issue of governance has been talked about before, so I'll just
summarize the decisions the Illumos community reached.
Governance causes way more problems than it solves.
And yet, without governance, you end up having no product. And supported
prod
On 09/12/14 10:53 AM, Nick Zivkovic wrote:
Developers are user too, you know. :)
Nobody questioned that :) Thing is, they are not the only one using the
things they make or change.
If they are the only one, every developer would have it's own distro...
Also there is difference between coders an
On 09/14/14 07:02 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Cordial thanks nevertheless to the few fellows, who have proven to be
true friends.
I hope not only people who donate money are true friends, because there
is much more to offer to each other but that.
And although I wanted to publish the src long a
On 09/15/14 02:33 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Nikola M. wrote:
On 09/14/14 07:02 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Furthermore it is nonsense what you write about the CDDL terms. The
CDDL permits the developer to keep the src closed, similar to the Xorg
license.
I would say it is nonsense what you
On 09/17/14 03:32 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Nikola M. wrote:
This is not correct: The CDDL is file based and you are allowed to add new
files that you may keep secret. You however need to publish everything you
modified and that was under CDDL.
You are wrong again: adding a file is not a
On 09/15/14 02:28 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Well, you UNIX Admin who only works for $$$.
:) I wish :P Actually I try to, that is the final goal, but I am long to
go to be cool guy like that. :humble: Aha, my car also work on pedals
and sweat, not gasoline , if you know what I mean. :P
You dam
On 09/15/14 08:47 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
And now: Peace and happiness.
From now on: UNSUBSCRIBED again.
Thanks again to my friends :)
This is really most annoying.
But consistent in being annoying, if that is for some credit.
___
oi-dev mailin
On 09/18/14 03:58 PM, ken mays via oi-dev wrote:
>
> Or the difference exist because I think CDDL forces treating files that
> change previous code as patches and you maybe say, that treating files
> that change existing code as patches is - optional?
If you add code in new files, it is fully op
On 09/26/14 09:33 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Guys, what do you think about this? First of all, why can't we just
make all incorporations
empty packages? What harm can it cause?
As I understand, consolidations are there to precisely lock versions of
interdependent packages, that are proved f
On 09/13/14 04:16 AM, Peter wrote:
I'm also investigating whether the crypto acceleration drivers can be
rewritten to support T1, T2 and T3, based on hypervisor documentation,
header files and some dtrace analysis.
I just picked up a 2U T2 sparc with 128 threads, 64GB Ram, 10GigE and
room f
On 09/26/14 07:11 AM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 26/09/2014 00:46, Andrew M. Hettinger wrote:
I'm presently running tests on a pool using 3x Samsung 850 SSDs on a
LSI-9211-8i
(IT) contoller. I thought I'd try seperating the intent log to see if
lowering
the write amplification on the pool-dr
On 09/13/14 09:58 AM, Joshua M. Clulow wrote:
On 13 September 2014 00:23, Peter wrote:
Current policy also denies would be community developers the benefits of an
experimental branch; peer review and wider testing. There may be exceptional
developers who's code is perfect, but I am not one of t
On 09/13/14 10:00 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
I'm personally one of those who don't care about SPARC, so I wouldn't
say that it's the main OI problem.
Main problem is that things people say being hostile to whole hardware
platforms,
turn people away from OI and illlumos. (like it is shown in
On 10/ 6/14 09:54 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
On 10/06/2014 11:33, Nikola M. wrote:
But not creating Teams is I think biggest problem of all.
Whom do you suppose these teams will consist of? Honestly, now we have
two informal teams - RE - Adrzej Szeszo and Ken Mays and dev team
On 10/ 8/14 08:19 PM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Not that I'm involved any more and I largely just lurk, but I think the
disconnect between /dev and /hipster needs to end. It's confusing.
I have proposed for years now that:
/hipster = rolling release
/dev = snapshots of /hipster
/release = /peri
On 10/ 9/14 01:15 AM, Bayard Bell wrote:
On 8 October 2014 23:36, Nikola M. <mailto:minik...@gmail.com>> wrote:
It was probably lack of organization that killed many efforts before.
From my experience trying to walk a mile in his shoes, I fully endorse
Alasdair's obse
On 10/13/14 07:58 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
We are ready to announce new OpenIndiana Hipster 2014.10.10 ISOs.
Hi, if it can not be updated from /dev why ISOs are made then?
You don't expect abandoning /dev and update line from Opensolaris all
up to Openindiana latest?
I think if
On 10/13/14 04:35 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
On 10/13/2014 18:25, Nikola M. wrote:
On 10/13/14 07:58 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
We are ready to announce new OpenIndiana Hipster 2014.10.10 ISOs.
Hi, if it can not be updated from /dev why ISOs are made then?
You don't e
On 10/13/14 06:48 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Hi Nikola,
my impression was that making things easier (feasible ?) to build and
update is actually a priority to make a sustainable /dev possible.
IMHO focus should be on having hipster replicate what /dev does, for
instance have JDS in userland as
On 10/14/14 08:43 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
On 10/13/2014 20:21, Nikola M. wrote:
I still wait for your reply on idea that every Hipster update has new
'entire' version changed, so someone testing could always update to
exact date and packages state to re-create environment
On 10/16/14 12:40 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2014-10-13 16:37, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
I've just upgraded FreeBSD to OI Hipster :) zpool split, detach,
reinstall, send|recv...
In a proper systematic approach that would have been "beadm create",
install, "beadm activate". At most, replace "bead
On 10/13/14 08:40 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Hi,
on a related topic, is there a repository with DDU source or should I
set one up on GitHub from the files delivered with OI ?
Best,
Why anything needs to be set up on Github, anyway?
Why just not using source repositories on OI?
If Git is what
On 11/30/14 11:26 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
please be aware that "OpenSolaris" is a trademark of Oracle, and not
freely available, and that Oracle have almost bottomless pockets when
protecting their trademarks.
Seems like Opensolaris brand provisions are still enabled and can not be
bring down
1 - 100 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
