)
at
org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeploymentScanner$ScannerThread.loo
p(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:212)
at
org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeploymentScanner$ScannerThread.run
(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:191)
Thanks
Regards,
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
No. This is the virus. DO NOT open the attachment.
Michael
- Original Message -
From: Jim Shingler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OJB Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: Email account utilization warning.
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is this
it to work!
Sorry, I forgot to mention the need for your lib's to be in the
CLASSPATH in the Manifest file.
Isn't it nice to be able to redeploy also!
-Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 2/28/2004 10:34 PM
To: OJB Users List
Thanks Andrew and Armin. I followed Andrew's advice and packaged everything
in one ear. Good news is I am also able to redeploy without having to
restart the app-server (no OJB redeployment issues so far).
Here's how I did it:
/ejb.jar/
...EJBs
...DAOs
...META-INF/
..ejb-jar.xml
I was wondering if anyone out there could comment on my usage of PersistenceBroker in
an EJB. I currently create a single instance during ejbCreate and keep it for the
duration of the bean's lifecycle. This seems like the most efficient way. Is there a
danger to using this approach when
OJB-cache is always pristine.
But I do have to do some extra work for saving tree's, and deleting
objects inside collections, etc.
Let me know if this helps.
-Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:47 PM
To: OJB
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:21 AM
Subject: Re: how to keep repository-user.xml mappings separate from ojb.sar?
Hi Michael,
Michael Mogley wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to deploy an application on JBoss 3.2.3 using latest OJB.
I've followed the steps to create an ojb.sar
,
Michael Mogley wrote:
Hi Armin,
So in this case, how would I access the broker? I assume through JNDI
somehow? Would I have to setup the PersistenceBrokerFactory as a
resource
adaptor? How would I do that?
Think it is possible to include a .sar file in an .ear file. Let the OJB
, you really only want one Persistence
layer across an enterprise.
-Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:47 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: how to keep repository-user.xml mappings separate from
ojb.sar?
Hi Armin
for 1.1 without guarantee).
I will look into this. Perhaps, it's not so complex. On the JCA, could you
or Matthew give me what you have so far? So I don't have to start from
scratch.
Cheers,
Michael
regards,
Armin
Michael Mogley wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Yeah, using a SessionBean as a facade
to reference another app's objects via jcdalias.
I keep ojb and all associated jar files in tomcat/common/lib with the global
repository placeholder and OJB.properties in tomcat/common/classes.
Thanks guys for a great OR tool.
Michael
- Original Message -
From: Michael Mogley [EMAIL
OK, I've got two Tomcat webapps. Each with it's own OJB.properties and repository xml
files defining two different mappings and two different connection descriptors.
Ojb libraries are in common/lib to allow sharing among webapps.
Everything was working file until I added the second webapp.
I think you'll find that putting OJB in /common/lib is your problem.
Try putting the the OJB jars in the each webapps WEB-INF/lib directory,
and
see if the problem goes away.
I think it will.
Cheers,
Charles.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 December 2003 07:34
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: ojb mixing up jdbc-connection-descriptors
You're probably right. But is there no way then to keep Ojb
as a shared
library?
Michael
- Original Message
classes in each webapp.
Dev guys?
Michael
- Original Message -
From: Michael Mogley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OJB Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: ojb mixing up jdbc-connection-descriptors
Maybe not desperate, but frustrated. I do
,
and
see if the problem goes away.
I think it will.
Cheers,
Charles.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 December 2003 07:29
To: OJB Users List
Subject: ojb mixing up jdbc-connection-descriptors
OK, I've got two Tomcat webapps
(since these classes are scoped by a specific webapp classloader).
OK, Ojb wins. I'm giving each app its own copy.
Michael
- Original Message -
From: Michael Mogley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OJB Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: ojb mixing up
task to change OJB to support multiple webapps. But I could be
wrong.
Cheers,
Charles.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 December 2003 07:34
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: ojb mixing up jdbc-connection-descriptors
You're
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: ojb mixing up jdbc-connection-descriptors
Michael Mogley wrote:
OK, I've got two Tomcat webapps. Each with it's own OJB.properties and
repository xml files defining two different mappings and two different
connection
,
Thomas
Michael Mogley wrote:
In my webapp, I've run across what may be a bug in Ojb.
I have an Album class with a collection of Photos.
I also have a jsp page, photoEdit.jsp, that retrieves a specific
Photo by identity, modifies it, then does PersistenceBroker.store.
I have
In my webapp, I've run across what may be a bug in Ojb.
I have an Album class with a collection of Photos.
I also have a jsp page, photoEdit.jsp, that retrieves a specific Photo by identity,
modifies it, then does PersistenceBroker.store.
I have another page, albumPhotos.jsp, that lists all
BTW, the Album object is cached in the session.
Michael
- Original Message -
From: Michael Mogley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OJB Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 3:07 PM
Subject: does PersistenceBroker.getCollectionByQuery use the cache?
In my webapp, I've run
Does Ojb offer a way to include additional propertiesin a proxy object besides the id?
I have an Image class with lightweight properties (name and description) and
heavyweight properties (various versions of the image data itself). In my webapp, I'd
like to pull down a list of ImageProxy
I agree. IMO, this should not require any additional mapping definitions
beyond those necessary to map the classes. It should be possible to
arbitrarily request a collection of a specific field type from a mapped
class, and this should be simple and easy through the API.
I would even propose
Message -
From: Michael Mogley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OJB Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: Collection of string
I agree. IMO, this should not require any additional mapping definitions
beyond those necessary to map the classes. It should
a report query
(Except that you get an Iterator to Object[] instead of an Iterator to a
Map. IMO, This would be easy enough to create in your application
persistence service.
Wally
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:14 PM
I've been aware of this aspect of Ojb for a while and have always
wondered why it chose not to implement the join solution to batch-reads.
The join, as John points out, in addition to guaranteeing reconstruction
of the object graph in one read, also handles cases of multiple
indirection. This is
: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: oracle BLOB 4K
Hi Michael,
Why don't you submit a sample code for it, and we will see if some one
else
can implement it in OJB before you become available to work on it.
Rajeev
- Original Message -
From: Michael Mogley [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Conall,
I have been hoping to rework my fix for this to fit better with Ojb's
existing design and framework. However, I am currently committed to
projects at work and am not likely to have much time for Ojb until
August. If someone wants to step in before then with a patch that takes
care of
29 matches
Mail list logo
