ses and have it fixed in
1.0, if possible.
--
regards
Var George
-
-Original Message-
From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 12:22 AM
To: 'OJB Users List'
Subject: RE: Using Ojb in Applications with large DB ta
Is this a bug in OJB (count() vs last.getrow())?
Also are any known scalability issues in using OBJ against large
tables (say million+ rows)?
--
regards
Var George
---
Hi,
This is a repost. Could anybody help me on that?
Thanks,
Zhe
at 09:20 AM, Armin Waibel wrote:
Hi,
Var George wrote:
Is there a method to force OJB to fully initialize at startup (read
all metadata, connection pool, etc) rather than incurring some of
this cost when querying an object first time as illustrated in your
test.
Sorry no, but why we should do
Is there a method to force OJB to fully initialize at startup (read all
metadata, connection pool, etc) rather than incurring some of this cost
when querying an object first time as illustrated in your test.
regards
Varughese George
On Tuesday, November 4, 2003, at 07:05 AM, Armin Waibel wrote:
OJB team,
Thank you for the great work on OJB. I have a suggestion regarding
source organization of OJB. Currently most of the sample/test programs
are put into the same package as the core OJB API classes, which is a
bit confusing. Even though source files for test classes are separated
und
