Wallace Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: Collection of string
Hi Michael,
I agree that there do exist scenarios that mapping a string to a
separate table could be desirable.
Ho
create in your application
persistence service.
Wally
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mogley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:14 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: Collection of string
I agree. IMO, this should not require any additional mapping
Message -
From: "Michael Mogley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: Collection of string
> I agree. IMO, this should not require any additional mapping definitions
> beyond t
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: Collection of string
> Hi all,
>
> YES, YES, and YES, I think we need this feature ! ;o)
> Why ?
> First, if you want to use yo
to difficult to maintain.
In short, YES, YES, and YES, we need this feature !
Best regards,
Sorry for my english !!
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye : mardi 25 novembre 2003 18:18
A : OJB Users List
Objet : Re: Collection of string
Hi all,
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, eric barbe wrote:
Hi,
Honestly, I did not test Hibernate, I only read the documentation.
Hibernate works the other way around from OBJ for modeling the XML.
What I saw for string list is this :
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, eric barbe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Honestly, I did not test Hibernate, I only read the documentation.
> Hibernate works the other way around from OBJ for modeling the XML.
> What I saw for string list is this :
>
>
>
>
> It seem's simply
dziak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye : lundi 24 novembre 2003 20:34
A : OJB Users List
Objet : RE: Collection of string
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
&g
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > 1. Define your DB coulm as VARCHAR.
> > 2. in the repository_user.xml you set
> > conversion="org.apache.ojb.broker.accesslayer.
> > conversions
Hello Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1. Define your DB coulm as VARCHAR.
> 2. in the repository_user.xml you set
> conversion="org.apache.ojb.broker.accesslayer.
> conversions.StringVector2Varch arFieldConversion"
> 3. That's all!
>
> All s
B Users List'
> Subject: RE: Collection of string
>
>
>
> Hi there is a very nice feature in OJB to handle this:
>
> 1. Define your DB coulm as VARCHAR.
> 2. in the repository_user.xml you set
> conversion="org.apache.ojb.broker.accesslayer.conversions.Stri
> ngVec
ned and written to the VARCHAR column
in human readable form.
cu,
Thomas
> -Original Message-
> From: eric barbe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 3:27 PM
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: RE: Collection of string
>
>
> Yes, you're
Yes, you're right, but what do you think about Hibernate witch seems to do
this very simply ?
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Thomas Dudziak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye : lundi 24 novembre 2003 11:01
A : OJB Users List
Objet : RE: Collection of string
On Mon, 24 Nov
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, eric barbe wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for your help.
> I thought about this solution, but honestly, it is not very beautiful.
> They are no other ways ?
> Is it possible to hope that OJB will do this easily in a future release ?
Thats not so much a problem of OJB but a
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye : vendredi 21 novembre 2003 18:15
A : OJB Users List
Objet : RE: Collection of string
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, eric barbe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I need to use this table on reporting applications that do not use
OJB.
> This fields must be readable.
>
The string cla
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, eric barbe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I need to use this table on reporting applications that do not use OJB.
> This fields must be readable.
>
The string class itself won't work as an existing string object cannot be
changed anymore (upon loading OJB creates the object using
Hi,
Yes, I need to use this table on reporting applications that do not use OJB.
This fields must be readable.
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Thomas Dudziak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye : vendredi 21 novembre 2003 17:39
A : OJB Users List
Objet : Re: Collection of string
~
O
Oops, wrong combination of jdbc-type and conversion:
CLOB and Object2Base64StringFieldConversion
BLOB and Object2ByteArrFieldConversion
Tom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P
~
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, eric barbe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to map a string list declared as ArrayList in my Java code.
> I declared a collection like this
>
>
> ...
> element-class-ref="java.lang.String" auto-update="true" auto-retrieve="true"
> auto-delete="false">
>
>
Hi,
I'm trying to map a string list declared as ArrayList in my Java code.
I declared a collection like this
...
...
I try to declare the class java.lang.String, it seems stupid, but i don't
know how to do :
And my DDL script looks like the follo
20 matches
Mail list logo
