Re: StackOverflow

2003-04-04 Thread Thomas Mahler
rs List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |cc: | |

Re: StackOverflow

2003-04-04 Thread David . Corbin
rs List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |cc: | |

Re: StackOverflow

2003-04-04 Thread David . Corbin
| |cc:

Re: StackOverflow

2003-04-03 Thread Thomas Mahler
hen refresh also the referenced A object" OJB will do exactly what you told it to do! Other O/R tools like TopLink behave similar! cheers, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it acceptable for OJB to cause a StackOverflow Exception (infinite recursion)? I get this when I do refresh="true"

Re: StackOverflow

2003-04-03 Thread Oki DZ
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:07:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The problem isn't there if you don't say refresh, but in that > case, OJB doesn't produce reliable/consistent data. Question is, can we expect that consistency is the responsibility of OJB? I think db consistency should be done

StackOverflow

2003-04-03 Thread David . Corbin
Is it acceptable for OJB to cause a StackOverflow Exception (infinite recursion)? I get this when I do refresh="true" on bidirectional references. The problem isn't there if you don't say refresh, but in that case, OJB doesn't produce reliable/consistent data. Davi