I meant to say Steve… Not sure who Eric is… 😊
From: on behalf of Alex Vul
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 10:16 AM
To: Alla Goldner , "onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org"
Cc: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" ,
"onap-disc...@lists.onap.org"
Subject: Re: [Onap-use
Hi Alla,
I could not attend today’s meeting because of conflicts. It’s hard to
reschedule on short notice, if you are triple booked already. 😊
Modularity and TOSCA TF are ARC activities. I will square them away with Eric.
Happy to present the HPA plans, at least what I know so far…
BR,
Alex
3 – No
From: on behalf of Kenny Paul
Reply-To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org"
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 at 6:08 PM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org"
Subject: [onap-tsc] Setting an official time-zone for ONAP? #poll
A new poll has been created:
This came up on the PTL call this morning. Since I
Hi,
Just to be clear – there is no action on this at this time…
From: on behalf of Alla Goldner
Reply-To: "onap-disc...@lists.onap.org" ,
"alla.gold...@amdocs.com"
Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 9:13 AM
To: "onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org"
Cc: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" , onap-discuss
of F2F meetings X
months apart…
My two cents,
Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
From: on behalf of Kenny Paul
Reply-To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org"
Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 6:41 AM
To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org"
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Looking for input on the Next O
Steve,
Why does it have to be one or the other? Why not both? In fact, why not make it
a standalone service able to take feeds from all ONAP modules that have data to
contribute. I honestly don’t know why this cannot be a separate project, that
caters to multiple stakeholders inside ONAP…
BR,
to reconsider this approach all together, or at least make
equitable for all companies involved…
Thanks,
Alex Vul,
Intel Corporation
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#4333): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4333
Mute
Alla,
What is this supposed to address? How is this going to help?
Thanks,
Alex
From: on behalf of Alla Goldner
Date: Monday, December 10, 2018 at 7:20 AM
To: "onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org"
Cc: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" ,
"onap-disc...@lists.onap.org"
Subject: [Onap-usecasesub] List of
p-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Cc: Lefevre, Catherine
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] New project proposal for Dublin and beyond...
Alex,
Do you have a link to the project proposal so we can start looking at it before
TSC meeting?
Thanks,
Alexis
On Nov 26, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Alex V
Hi Catherine,
I have a Dublin project proposal for support of Composable Disaggregated
Infrastructure in ONAP. I would like to review this proposal with the TSC. Is
there an opportunity to do so this Thursday’s meeting on November 29th?
Thanks in advance,
Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
The HPA functional requirement work in Dublin shall continue.
Kind regards,
Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#4133): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4133
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org
that new projects require a review by the ARC and a
review/approval by the TSC. No other reviews/approvals seem to be required. Can
you please confirm this as well…
Thank you in advance,
Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View
Will do…
From: on behalf of Alla Goldner
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 2:01 AM
To: Pamela Dragosh , "Vul, Alex"
, "srinivasa.m.kalap...@verizon.com"
, Bora Eliacik ,
Ramki Krishnan , "Ranganathan, Raghu" ,
"BHOJAN, SUMITHRA"
Cc: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" ,
"onap-disc...@lists.onap.o
Hi,
Can the TSC confirm that the Dublin release milestones linked below are the
right ones?
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+Planning
Thanks in advance,
Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#4030
. Perhaps ETSI or Orange would be
able to provide a couple of large rooms…
Just thinking out loud…
Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
From: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org [mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of
Kenny Paul
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 10:34
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] F2F Meeting(s
NAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
Cc: Andrei Kojukhov
mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com>>; Lingli Deng
mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>; Mark Gibson
mailto:mar...@amdocs.com>>; 'eric.deb...@orange.com'
mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>; WECHSLER, CHESL
implemented
correctly. We don’t need committers outside the projects to be involved in this
process…
Kind regards,
Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
From: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Hedstrom
Sent: Friday, July 6, 2018 21:38
To: denghui (L)
Cc: GILBERT
Dear all,
Agree with Brian. The scope of the modeling project, as it was agreed upon, was
to focus on modeling related tools. Modeling specifications and their curation
was always part of the modeling subcommittee work.
Recall that when modeling subcommittee was formed, the intents was for
ind
Dear all,
I would suggest that we allow the newly minted TSC, whenever it is elected, to
establish their own operational efficiencies and procedures.
Kind regards,
Alex Vul
Intel Corporation
From: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org] On
Behalf Of Arash Hekmat
19 matches
Mail list logo
