One-character change, when you get around to it :-)
On 7/18/2011 21:35, cmar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: cmarcum
Date: Tue Jul 19 01:35:00 2011
New Revision: 1148126
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1148126&view=rev
Log:
specified instructions used Subversion Command-Line Client
noted onl
On 19 July 2011 06:37, Peter Junge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still getting requests now and again from persons who want to use the
> trademark OpenOffice.org for various reasons. In former times I have been
> pointing them to a web form that Oracle was providing. So, my questions are:
> - Is the OOo tr
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
> Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> > Am 07/18/2011 10:04 PM, schrieb David McKay:
> >>
> >> On 18/07/11 20:50, Andy Brown wrote:
> >>> Mathias Bauer wrote:
> On 18.07.2011 20:21, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>
> >> 1) xpdf (GPL'd) is a run dependency,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to get rid of some copyleft dependencies. As I will leave for
> vacation on Wednesday, I now send my first patch to the list so that
> others already can have a look or even continue. I only did it on Linux
> so far, of course
I'm wondering whether the Oracle owned blogs on OOo will be contributed
to the Apache project too? E.g. having the instructions for converting a
module to the gbuild systems would be good.
The "gullfoss" blog (http://blogs.oracle.com/GullFOSS/) gets a 404
nowadays, but google still finds them
Am 19.07.2011 16:38, schrieb Ross Gardler:
On 19 July 2011 06:37, Peter Junge wrote:
[...]
- If yes, I recall I have to forward them to tradema...@apache.org, right?
It's the job of the (P)PMC to manage the trademark policy (see
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/)
What this means is
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 18 July 2011 16:22, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > Just to be clear: The time in proposal was 10 days, from June 1 to June
> 10. "Weeks" is a stretch.
>
> Really? Wow it felt much longer ;-) Thanks for the correction.
>
> > We should ackno
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> On 19 July 2011 06:37, Peter Junge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm still getting requests now and again from persons who want to use the
>> trademark OpenOffice.org for various reasons. In former times I have been
>> pointing them to a web form that
Apache has two "planet" blog aggregators, one for Apache project blogs
[1] and one for Committer's personal blogs [2]. There are
instructions [3] for adding your blog to the latter aggregator. (SVN
required)
There is also a OpenOffice.org Community Planet [4]. Does anyone know
the details of thi
TJ,
On 07/19/2011 04:09 AM, TJ Frazier wrote:
One-character change, when you get around to it :-)
On 7/18/2011 21:35, cmar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: cmarcum
Date: Tue Jul 19 01:35:00 2011
New Revision: 1148126
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1148126&view=rev
Log:
(SNIP)
## Sub-comma
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:17 AM, imacat wrote:
> On 2011/07/19 03:08, Rob Weir said:
>> +1 Let's start from a stable build and make changes from there that
>> leave the build stable. So I think it looks like this:
>> 1) Get all OOo Hg repository converted over to SVN. This will include
>> al
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Apache has two "planet" blog aggregators, one for Apache project blogs
> [1] and one for Committer's personal blogs [2]. There are
> instructions [3] for adding your blog to the latter aggregator. (SVN
> required)
>
> There is also a OpenOffice.o
TJ,
Sorry, I was in a hurry and didn't credit you in the log message.
Regards,
Carl
Sent from my phone
I've uploaded the slides of my presentation to the ODF Plugfest to
slideshare [1]. Consider it to be under the Apache License if anyone
wants to reuse it.
Alan Bell of Open Forum Europe has also uploaded a video of the
presentation at [2] (thanks Alan)
Ross
[1] http://www.slideshare.net/rgardler
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> I'm wondering whether the Oracle owned blogs on OOo will be contributed to
> the Apache project too? E.g. having the instructions for converting a module
> to the gbuild systems would be good.
>
> The "gullfoss" blog
> (http://blogs.oracle.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Apache has two "planet" blog aggregators, one for Apache project blogs
> [1] and one for Committer's personal blogs [2]. There are
> instructions [3] for adding your blog to the latter aggregator. (SVN
> required)
>
> There is also a OpenOffice.
On 2011/07/19 19:02, Rob Weir said:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:17 AM, imacat wrote:
>> On 2011/07/19 03:08, Rob Weir said:
> Possibly. But I don't see anything from Symphony is a "must have" for
> AOOo 3.4. I think it is more important that we complete 3.4 with the
> feature set that was origi
On 7/18/2011 10:37 PM, Peter Junge wrote:
Hi,
I'm still getting requests now and again from persons who want to use
the trademark OpenOffice.org for various reasons. In former times I
have been pointing them to a web form that Oracle was providing. So,
my questions are:
- Is the OOo trade
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Malte Timmermann
wrote:
> I can (after my vacation) write about the IA2 migration details and status
> in a separate mail if someone is interested.
Malte
I would indeed be interested in a summary of the work and status.
Thanks
Steve Lee
OpenDirective
Hi,
I was digging a bit into 3rd party licenses for the Hunspell issue and
came across Category B: Reciprocal Licenses in
http://apache.org/legal/3party.html and noted that Hunspell is
tri-licensed also under MPL 1.1 that would be permissive as long as the
code is distributed only in binary form a
Yes, ASF counsel and I are working with Oracle to get the paperwork
signed and finished to transfer a number of "OpenOffice.org" registered
trademarks (and related marks) to the ASF, from a number of different
countries. (Thanks Andrew)
Andrew (or whoever): how/when can we get the submissions
Hi Mathias,
On Monday, 2011-07-18 19:14:46 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> I wanted to have it lazy ;-), so I just added a single configure switch
> "--with-disable-copyleft" and did some quick and dirty changes to
> configure.in.
Well, that resulted in copyleft always disabled ;-) because in
if
On 14.07.2011 18:03, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 09.07.2011 07:57, Greg Stein wrote:
Once the tags are properly marked, then we can start testing the
conversion to Subversion. Please note, however: the hg conversion
script does *not* process tags. We will have to write that. We will
also have to som
Hi Eike,
thanks a lot for your improvements!
On 19.07.2011 23:21, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
>
> On Monday, 2011-07-18 19:14:46 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>
>> I wanted to have it lazy ;-), so I just added a single configure switch
>> "--with-disable-copyleft" and did some quick and dir
- Original Message
> From: Michael Stahl
> On 14.07.2011 18:03, Michael Stahl wrote:
> > On 09.07.2011 07:57, Greg Stein wrote:
> >> Once the tags are properly marked, then we can start testing the
> >> conversion to Subversion. Please note, however: the hg conversion
> >> script does
Hello Eike;
I think you are right. I should mention that on FreeBSD, LibreO uses
the preinstalled hunspell package so using the upstream version is
possible already. Furthermore, we should use the same approach for ICU
and other dependencies: if the system already has such packages, why not
Hi *,
So what is the deal now?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 14/06/2011 19:47, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>>> On 14.06.2011 19:49, Rob Weir wrote:
e.g., #dev.openoffice.org
on
freenode
>
> In the ASF
On 19 July 2011 19:41, Eike Rathke wrote:
> I was digging a bit into 3rd party licenses for the Hunspell issue and
> came across Category B: Reciprocal Licenses in
> http://apache.org/legal/3party.html and noted that Hunspell is
> tri-licensed also under MPL 1.1 that would be permissive as long as
I think that the desire to have a full history is a serious one.
I fancy Michael's option 3 (that which shall not be numbered [;<). It sounds
like the least that could possibly work, so it strikes me as an important
approach to consider, especially if it sheds critical path for getting the code
Once this is cooked, I'm eager for us to pick up the threads on trademark
enforcement against "subscription fraud" abusers of the trademarks. See
http://www.itworld.com/security/182757/floss-accept-no-substitutes for an
overview of the issue. At Sun, we regularly pursued the pond-scum who preyed
on
FWIW;
When merging the branches most of the CWS information will be
lost anyways .. won't it? I have seen other projects using
subversion that take a snapshot and eventually update stuff
from trunk, but when the project is finished and merged back
the branch history is not viewable from the trunk,
31 matches
Mail list logo
