RE: Moved over the old OOo archive

> -Original Message- > From: Raphael Bircher [mailto:r.birc...@gmx.ch] > Sent: Friday, 4 November 2011 3:20 PM > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Moved over the old OOo archive > > Hi at all > > I just moved the old OOo archive to the Apache archive server. After talkback > w

Moved over the old OOo archive

Hi at all I just moved the old OOo archive to the Apache archive server. After talkback with the infra team, I find out that it's allowed to have old releases in the apache archive, even the builds are LGPLed. Subversion has done the same to. The OOo Archive it's a realy valua part. It's a p

Re: Issuew building with prepackaged stuff (was Re: Problem building main/sal/cppunittester)

--- On Thu, 11/3/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: ... > Gbuild does not find libsaxfx.so, so it tries to build. > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/solenv/gbuild/platform/freebsd.mk?view=markup#l264 > > remove fi and fx from gb_Library_OOOEXT > > This should work. > Ye

Re: [DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process

On Nov 3, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > ++1 > > A little tuning, for what it is worth: > > It is not necessary to subscribe to any of these lists in order to ask for > help. They will be moderated in. > > It might be nice if the mailto: entry specified a subject that wo

Re: request

On 11/03/2011 04:34 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Whether or not we continue NL sites when the switchover occurs is a decision for the project. I used to lurk on two OOo mailing lists because I'm interested in following news and developments in language tools, such as spelling and grammar checkers. F

Re: [ISSUE] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:41 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: > On 11/3/2011 19:18, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> It was reported off list that my calculation was in error.  I lost a >> digit some place.  8746 accounts have submitted issues in Bugzilla. >> So given the claimed 500,000 openoffice.org email addresses t

Re: Issuew building with prepackaged stuff (was Re: Problem building main/sal/cppunittester)

Hello Pedro On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 01:02:36PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > FWIW; > > There seem to be problems when using some libraries externally. > > I solved another issue in BZ 118574, but it seems weird that no > one else hit it before so I would like someone with better C++ > skills to

Re: [ISSUE] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses

Rob Weir wrote on Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 19:18:13 -0400: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > > wrote: > >> Rob speaketh, > >> > >>   ... let's admit that almost all of the 500,000 openoffice.org > >>   addresses are unused or w

Re: [ISSUE] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses

On 11/3/2011 19:18, Rob Weir wrote: It was reported off list that my calculation was in error. I lost a digit some place. 8746 accounts have submitted issues in Bugzilla. So given the claimed 500,000 openoffice.org email addresses that have been assigned, that means that 99.99% of them are not

RE: [DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process

++1 A little tuning, for what it is worth: It is not necessary to subscribe to any of these lists in order to ask for help. They will be moderated in. It might be nice if the mailto: entry specified a subject that would let us know it is from the request link though. That would emphasi

Re: [ISSUE] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> Rob speaketh, >> >>   ... let's admit that almost all of the 500,000 openoffice.org >>   addresses are unused or were created by spammers and have zero >>   relevancy to the project. >>

Re: [DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:14 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: > On 11/3/2011 17:59, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> I'm thinking of changing the links on: >>> >>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/**projects/native-lang.html

Re: [DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > I'm thinking of changing the links on: > > > > http://ooo-site.apache.org/projects/native-lang.html > > > > to the format we're using at the staging site-- > > > > http://ooo-site.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process

On 11/3/2011 17:59, Dave Fisher wrote: On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: I'm thinking of changing the links on: http://ooo-site.apache.org/projects/native-lang.html to the format we're using at the staging site-- http://ooo-site.apache.org/"nl-abbreviation"; and putting a link

Re: [DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process

On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > I'm thinking of changing the links on: > > http://ooo-site.apache.org/projects/native-lang.html > > to the format we're using at the staging site-- > > http://ooo-site.apache.org/"nl-abbreviation"; > > and putting a link on the staging home page

[DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process

I'm thinking of changing the links on: http://ooo-site.apache.org/projects/native-lang.html to the format we're using at the staging site-- http://ooo-site.apache.org/"nl-abbreviation"; and putting a link on the staging home page http://ooo-site.apache.org to the revised http://ooo-site.apach

Issuew building with prepackaged stuff (was Re: Problem building main/sal/cppunittester)

FWIW; There seem to be problems when using some libraries externally. I solved another issue in BZ 118574, but it seems weird that no one else hit it before so I would like someone with better C++ skills to review it. Now I am stuck here: cheers, Pedro. Building module unoxml = E

Re: [CODE] issue 118570: configure does not recognize latest DirectX SDK

On 11/3/11 6:03 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 11/3/11 5:34 PM, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi, Issue 118570 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118570) now contains a diff that makes configure detect DirectX correctly when the latest DirectX SDK (from June 2010) is installed. It would be mu

Re: [CODE] issue 118570: configure does not recognize latest DirectX SDK

On 11/3/11 5:34 PM, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi, Issue 118570 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118570) now contains a diff that makes configure detect DirectX correctly when the latest DirectX SDK (from June 2010) is installed. It would be much appreciated if a comitter would find the

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai issues

On Nov 3, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, David McKay wrote: >> >> On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> >>> On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote: Hi, Mark, et al., Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just c

Web Strategy using the Apache CMS [Was: Re: request]

Hi Rob, In addition to thinking through the strategy for openoffice.org we should be thinking about the podling site's main page and how we really want to organize and personalize that for developers. For example, BZ and SVN feeds. Wiki changes. Build tips ... The left nav is getting heavy and

[CODE] issue 118570: configure does not recognize latest DirectX SDK

Hi, Issue 118570 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118570) now contains a diff that makes configure detect DirectX correctly when the latest DirectX SDK (from June 2010) is installed. It would be much appreciated if a comitter would find the time to review and apply the patch.

Re: Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai issues

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, David McKay wrote: > > On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Mark, et al., >>> >>> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came >>> in. I would have expected today's date. >> >> It is

Re: Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai issues

On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote: On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote: Hi, Mark, et al., Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came in. I would have expected today's date. It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next upgrade. There ma

Re: request

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2011, at 4:28 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:16:43AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> There was a large effort to handle the redirector to

Re: request

On Nov 3, 2011, at 4:28 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile > wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:16:43AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > There was a large effort to handle the redirector to the different NL. NL > are not translations of the homepa

Re: Problem building main/sal/cppunittester

Hi Maho; Yes, I am trying to use more external stuff in FreeBSD's port. We (AOOo) will have to live with the external cppunit anyways due to the license so this will be solved... eventually. cheers, Pedro. --- On Thu, 11/3/11, Maho NAKATA wrote: > Hi, > I reprodced this..cppunit you use is e

Re: ooo-general-ja mailing list settings

Hi Marcus, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Maybe you should be patient as the weekend is just over and depending where > the people are located in the world it takes time to look into the problem > and finding an answer. Yes. You are right. The next weekend is coming. :)

Re: request

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:16:43AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >>There was a large effort to handle the redirector to the different NL. NL >> >>are not translations of the homepage are different communities in itself. >> >>Somethin

Re: MacOS X Lion compatible

Le 03/11/11 11:58, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : > > Are do the plist files have the same name and are they stored in the > same place ? Forget that question, a search in Finder reveals that the plist files also have different names. Alex

Re: Problem building main/sal/cppunittester

Hi, I reprodced this..cppunit you use is external one. thanks Nakata Maho From: Pedro Giffuni Subject: Problem building main/sal/cppunittester Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:41:00 -0700 (PDT) > Hi; > > I am advancing slowly through the FreeBSD build > and I found this: > > ... > > Entering > /usr

Re: MacOS X Lion compatible

Le 01/11/11 22:18, Thorsten Behrens a écrit : Hi Thorsten, > LibO uses ~/Library/Application Support/LibreOffice (not > OpenOffice.org) - please don't jump to conclusions just yet. Beyond > that, we always welcome patches to make LibreOffice even more > distinct. :) > Are do the plist files hav

Re: MacOS X Lion compatible

Le 01/11/11 19:17, FR web forum a écrit : Hi all, > The user has given me some details to reproduce. > This seems appear when LibO is already installed. > If you add OOo, the install process try to retreive the LibO profile > The problem is fixed if LibO is uninstalled. > There is a report her

Re: request

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:29:38AM +0100, FR web forum wrote: > >N-L Projects had Project Leads > >http://projects.openoffice.org/native-lang.html > > Sorry but this list is outdated. For French NL, the 2 leaders leave OOo and > go to LibO. that's why the *had* in the sentence you quoted. Anothe

Re: request

>N-L Projects had Project Leads >http://projects.openoffice.org/native-lang.html Sorry but this list is outdated. For French NL, the 2 leaders leave OOo and go to LibO.

Re: request

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:16:43AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >>There was a large effort to handle the redirector to the different NL. NL > >>are not translations of the homepage are different communities in itself. > >>Something that was governance with the NLC and other structures. N-L Proj

Re: Greetings from Betsy

On 11/2/11 9:14 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: On 01.11.2011 09:21, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: the help content is currently coming from xhp files that you can find in the helpcontent2 module in the source. xhp files are xml files that can be edited with the office (a special filter is required) and there

Re: request

On 11/3/11 1:42 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: On Nov 2, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Shahafwrote: Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 13:19:46 -0400: On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Donald Whytock wrote: 2011/11/2 Łukasz Janik: Please tr