Pedro Giffuni ha scritto:
Copyleft imposes restrictions on software and when you
try to impose your freedoms to other people, the result
ends up being less free. We respect copyleft, but we want
more.
Well, I understand your point.
I created a new dictionary from scratch because the author of
Rob Weir ha scritto:
1) The user can download the dictionaries onto their own machines, if
they agree to uphold the license.
2) We could have a UI in the product that helps the user download
dictionaries. This could state the license and require the user to
click agree.
Like I've wrote to
Hi,
On 05.11.2011 12:27, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 4 Nov 2011, at 15:38, Oliver-Rainer
Wittmannorwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
our build tool dmake is licensed under GPL. Thus, it can not be
part of our source releases. But, we can use it for building - as
we are using the gcc compiler.
Hi,
I have news on this, but not good news.
The crash is not directly caused but triggered by the fix for issue
112786. That issue fixes the config manager singleton to actually
getting destroyed when the office closes. Not destroying it is not nice
but, to my knowledge, causes not
Hi,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:06:28 +0100
Von: Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se
In order to license, you need copyright. For example, you cannot
put old source code by Leonardo da Vinci under GPL, because
its copyright has expired. If the creators of
Hi,
On 05.11.2011 12:09, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hello Oliver,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:52:05PM +0100, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
I am not planning to remove the report builder extension.
I am planning to remove the 3rd party components which are used by
the report builder extension
Le 7 nov. 11 à 09:51, Andre Fischer a écrit :
Hi,
Hi Andre,
I have news on this, but not good news.
:-/
The crash is not directly caused but triggered by the fix for issue
112786. That issue fixes the config manager singleton to actually
getting destroyed when the office
Hello Pedro,
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 02:48:26PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Ugh.. I'm still struggling with the BSD build, and
apparently it should be simple but perhaps someone
that knows well the build structure can give me a good hint:
=
Building module vcl
=
On 07.11.2011 05:49, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Thanks Mathias,
I found the ATL headers in the WinDDK/.../inc/atl71/, and libraries
too. There is also the ATL Reference Guide and other materials
available at MSDN on-line, along with some books in a very dusty
corner of my office shelves. That
Firstly, thanks to Eric for the explanation.
I'm not a developer so, it's rather important that I understand how the
whole thing technically works. :-)
More comments follow below.
eric b ha scritto:
3) at buildtime, the content of every locale is zipped as an extension
At least this is
On 07.11.2011 09:50, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 03.11.2011 09:16, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 02.11.2011 15:52, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
I am not planning to remove the report builder extension.
I am planning to remove the 3rd party components which are used by the
report builder
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Gianluca Turconi
in...@letturefantastiche.com wrote:
Pedro Giffuni ha scritto:
Copyleft imposes restrictions on software and when you
try to impose your freedoms to other people, the result
ends up being less free. We respect copyleft, but we want
more.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
In order to graduate there can be no license incompatible code in SVN. The
solution below is ok only as an interim solution.
This statement conflicts with what I thought Robert had told us
previously. My
Hello Rob,
Le 07/11/2011 12:51, Rob Weir a écrit :
What you say above does not really make a legal difference. What
makes something copyright-able is creative expression. not hard work.
You could spend decades collecting data on bird populations, measuring
the positions of stars, recording
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Olivier R. olivier.nore...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Rob,
Le 07/11/2011 12:51, Rob Weir a écrit :
What you say above does not really make a legal difference. What
makes something copyright-able is creative expression. not hard work.
You could spend decades
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- On Mon, 11/7/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
Remember, there are no pure Apache 2,0 licensed
operating
systems.
Who said that??
http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang
I
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:08:36AM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
OK
hmm.. you asked for it ;)
=
Building module vcl
=
Entering /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl/prj
cd .. gmake -r -j1
[ build LNK ] Library/libvcl.so
splitting the
--- On Mon, 11/7/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile ariel.constenla.ha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the analysis. We have some patches concerning -rpath
in the OOo port for icu but this shouldn't be needed for the
external ICU.
By the way, why do have icu in /usr/local/lib? Is this the
default
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:50:21AM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- On Mon, 11/7/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile ariel.constenla.ha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the analysis. We have some patches concerning -rpath
in the OOo port for icu but this shouldn't be needed for the
external ICU.
2011/11/7 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
We can do three things for an Apache release:
1) We can release source code tarballs, with only Apache 2.0 and
compatible source. Someone would then be free to take this source and
build it themselves, including code from other licenses as they wish.
In this case the text is null (the string passed as argument to the setText
method). The xTextComponent it is constructed correctly.
I've uploaded all the NetBeans project to my GitHub account, you can check
all the code and test the whole project just by downloading everything
contained there:
Wow.. that is definitely likely to work!
You know very well the build system. Thanks!
Pedro.
--- On Mon, 11/7/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile ariel.constenla.ha...@gmail.com
wrote:
then try modifying solenv/gbuild/platform/freebsd.mk l.
124
gb_LinkTarget_LDFLAGS := \
I have addressed my problem with the null ref, it was due to assigning to
xText.setText, a null string, i only added an if:
public void setText(String text){
if (text != null)
this.xTextComponent.setText(text);
}
I'm not really happy with this solution, but it seams to work good, so
Hello Gerardo,
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:25:40PM -0600, Gerardo Gómez wrote:
I have addressed my problem with the null ref, it was due to assigning to
xText.setText, a null string, i only added an if:
public void setText(String text){
if (text != null)
Hello Dave,
Le 07/11/2011 17:27, Dave Fisher a écrit :
Rob is not an Apache Member, neither am I. We are Apache Committers
and on the Apache OpenOffice.org (incubating) PPMC.
Thanks for the clarification.
To all, please accept my apologies for my confusion.
An official opinion is a
Hi Olivier;
--- On Mon, 11/7/11, Olivier R. olivier.nore...@gmail.com wrote:
I read that a legal issue would be raised about the GPL
dictionaries. Then Rob was wondering how dictionaries could
be copyrighted. I thought that if lawyers knew that
copyrights on such matter were irrelevant,
Hello Ariel.
the underlying issue is in LoginPanel.fillCredentials():
this.getUserNameTextField().
setText(creditionals.getUserName());
creditionals.getUserName() returns null. You should check if this is a bug
or the expected behaviour (no OOo API bug in either case).
I'm agree with you,
On 2011-11-07 8:27 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Olivier,
Thanks for bringing your experienced perspective to the list!
On Nov 7, 2011, at 8:14 AM, Olivier R. wrote:
Le 07/11/2011 16:53, Rob Weir a écrit :
Why would Apache care about that?
Maybe just because you are an Apache member and you
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Olivier;
--- On Mon, 11/7/11, Olivier R. olivier.nore...@gmail.com wrote:
I read that a legal issue would be raised about the GPL
dictionaries. Then Rob was wondering how dictionaries could
be copyrighted. I thought
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
The complexity of the language is irrelevant. The point is that the
complexity is not created or invented by the person who compiles the
dictionary. The complexity is not the creative expression of an
author. The
Hi *,
On the long run I think the Apache-Way means we give
prevalence to freedom over features so we either move
back to MySpell
it has already been said that MySpell is a step backward
or we do something completely new based
on Apache openNLP.
we means here software developers in the
--- On Mon, 11/7/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi *,
On the long run I think the Apache-Way means we give
prevalence to freedom over features so we either move
back to MySpell
it has already been said that MySpell is a step backward
It is, but can't we have both MySpell and
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:00:49PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On the long run I think the Apache-Way means we give
prevalence to freedom over features so we either move
back to MySpell
it has already been said that MySpell is a step backward
It is, but can't we have both
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- On Mon, 11/7/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi *,
On the long run I think the Apache-Way means we give
prevalence to freedom over features so we either move
back to MySpell
it has already been said that
Unless you provide the spellchecking dictionaries that IBM uses and
prove your point,
IBM might well think/realise that the spellchecking dictionaries their
products use are not protected by copyright. That doesn't mean Rob, or
some of IBM's customers, would have any right to redistribute them.
35 matches
Mail list logo
