Re: Lost localisation files?

Hi, sorry for not answering earlier, was on vacation last week, I will try to put the old pootle server online again within the next days, so at least the data shouldn't be lost, I keep you updated with the progress, Martin On 12/20/11 10:51 PM, André Schnabel wrote: Hi, Am 13.12.2011 14

Re: Build braker in drawinglayer

Am 20.12.11 13:23, schrieb Armin Le Grand: On 20.12.2011 13:05, eric b wrote: Hi Ariel, Le 20 déc. 11 à 12:25, Ariel Constenla-Haile a écrit : Hi Raphael, On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:11:28PM +0100, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi at all server3:drawinglayer server3$ make -sr [ build DEP ] LNK:Lib

Re: Lost localisation files?

Brilliant, thanks Martin. Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Dec 21, 2011 10:24 AM, "Martin Hollmichel" < martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for not answering earlier, was on vacation last week, > > I will try to put the old pootle server onlin

Re: Calling TOO members re pootle data (was Re: Calling Martin, Stefan Matthias re the OOo pootle data)

Thanks Pedro, I missed the earlier note. Also, to you're of this thread, Martin has posted elsewherethat he is on it. Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Dec 21, 2011 1:52 AM, "Pedro Giffuni" wrote: > FWIW, > > Martin Hollmichel did write to this list and mentioned

Re: Build braker in drawinglayer

On 21.12.2011 11:55, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 20.12.11 13:23, schrieb Armin Le Grand: On 20.12.2011 13:05, eric b wrote: [..] Confirming. I built Win and Mac, seems as if that was not enough :-( Sigh... Building Linux now to solve those warnings.. I was building it succesfull without --en

Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on openofficeorg-nightly

A couple of days after a major branch merge of Armin's new SVG work and the build is clean! Great work everyone. Regards, Dave On Dec 20, 2011, at 11:39 PM, build...@apache.org wrote: > The Buildbot has finished a build on builder openofficeorg-nightly while > building ASF Buildbot. > Full de

Re: Build braker in drawinglayer

Am 21.12.11 13:36, schrieb Armin Le Grand: On 21.12.2011 11:55, Raphael Bircher wrote: Am 20.12.11 13:23, schrieb Armin Le Grand: On 20.12.2011 13:05, eric b wrote: [..] Confirming. I built Win and Mac, seems as if that was not enough :-( Sigh... Building Linux now to solve those warnings.

ld: gold vs bfd

Hi all, I ran into a problem with a Linux build. On Ubuntu (both 32bit and 64bit) linking of comphelper failed with a lot of unresolved references. With the help of Herbert I could solve this by using a different linker. Instead of ld.bfd I used ld.gold and could build comphelper and the rest

Re: Lost localisation files?

On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:23 AM, Martin Hollmichel wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for not answering earlier, was on vacation last week, > > I will try to put the old pootle server online again within the next days, so > at least the data shouldn't be lost, I keep you updated with the progress, This is gr

R: ld: gold vs bfd

--- Mer 21/12/11, Andre Fischer ha scritto: ... > Hi all, > > I ran into a problem with a Linux build.  On Ubuntu > (both 32bit and 64bit) linking of comphelper failed > with a lot of unresolved references.  With the help of > Herbert I could solve this by using a different linker. > Instead of

Re: Build braker in drawinglayer

Armin, On Dec 21, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Armin Le Grand wrote: > I'm also confused now, I just built the mac version with '--enable-werror', > no problem. Trying Linux now... what Mac OS X system and compiler are you using? I use gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3) on 10.6.8. The wa

Re: Build braker in drawinglayer

> The warning is: > > cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors > /Users/pavel/BUILD/BuildDir/ooo_trunk_src/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/patternfillprimitive2d.cxx:146: > warning: unused parameter ‘rViewInformation’ I put up not-to-be-applied (but self explanatory) patch for WaE clean drawin

Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on openofficeorg-nightly

Am Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2011 schrieb Dave Fisher : > A couple of days after a major branch merge of Armin's new SVG work and the build is clean! > > Great work everyone. +1 Juergen > > Regards, > Dave > > On Dec 20, 2011, at 11:39 PM, build...@apache.org wrote: > >> The Buildbot has finished a

Re: Build braker in drawinglayer

Hi Pavel Am 21.12.11 20:51, schrieb Pavel Janík: The warning is: cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors /Users/pavel/BUILD/BuildDir/ooo_trunk_src/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/patternfillprimitive2d.cxx:146: warning: unused parameter ‘rViewInformation’ I put up not-to-be-applied (but se

[WWW] new term for old "accepted" projects

Hi all-- I was just looking at /projects/accepted.html on https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/ with the intention of changing the links to the relative treatment we're using now when I see that Dave has already taken of this! Go Dave! :) My question now is -- i

Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

Today Team OpenOffice released a "White Label Office" based off the 3.3 code. The press release is rather clumsily worded and their website is still not in compliance with our trademark policy. However, I do recognise that TeamOO appear to be seeking to address our concerns. Götz Wohlberg said on

Re: Build braker in drawinglayer

>> I put up not-to-be-applied (but self explanatory) patch for WaE clean >> drawing layer at: >> >> http://tmp.janik.cz/AOOo/drawinglayer-WaE.diff >> >> It also contains patch from #i110731#. > There is realy a problem. I use the same GCC as you and I run in the same > problem again today eveni

Re: Build braker in drawinglayer

Hi Pavel, Le 21 déc. 11 à 23:11, Pavel Janík a écrit : I put up not-to-be-applied (but self explanatory) patch for WaE clean drawing layer at: http://tmp.janik.cz/AOOo/drawinglayer-WaE.diff It also contains patch from #i110731#. There is realy a problem. I use the same GCC as you and I run

Re: [WWW] new term for old "accepted" projects

On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > Hi all-- > > I was just looking at /projects/accepted.html on > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/ > > with the intention of changing the links to the relative treatment we're > using now when I see that Dav

Re: About Team OpenOffice.org

2011/12/20 Götz Wohlberg : > Hi Ross, > > Thanks for your kind words! I've absorbed your email now and see all the appropriate questions have been asked. I look forward to hearing the answers and working with you to ensure you build the collaboration you need to realise your personal goals. It is

Re: About Team OpenOffice.org

Donald, Am 20.12.11 19:39, schrieb Donald Harbison: Götz, Thank you very much for this information. We wish we had heard from you much sooner. Thank you! I hope it's not too late! Some additional comments and questions inline. 2011/12/20 Götz Wohlberg Hi all, May I introduce myself? My na

RE: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

Let me go a step further. Here's the problem I have with what Team OpenOffice is doing. Team OpenOffice began their "donation" campaign by telling the world that the OpenOffice.org project was at risk of disappearing. This damaged the OpenOffice.org brand by leading users to question whether Ope

Re: [WWW] new term for old "accepted" projects

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > Hi all-- > > > > I was just looking at /projects/accepted.html on > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/ > > > > with the intention of changing the

Re: About Team OpenOffice.org

Hi Donald, Le 20 déc. 11 à 19:39, Donald Harbison a écrit : Götz, Thank you very much for this information. We wish we had heard from you much sooner. Some additional comments and questions inline. To 3: Here is a quote from a kind user who is trying to help us to make our case. I thin

Re: [WWW] new term for old "accepted" projects

On Dec 21, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> On Dec 21, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> Hi all-- >>> >>> I was just looking at /projects/accepted.html on >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-sit

Re: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

[ Long mail from non-English native speaker, not written on mobile device ;-) ] Ross, On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:10 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Today Team OpenOffice released a "White Label Office" based off the > 3.3 code. ... I think the core issue here is "responsibility to users", "credibility o

Re: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

Pavel, Thank you for your perspective. I think a properly released OpenOffice.org 3.3.1 is totally possible.. I recall Martin came to the list with the idea. We took separate paths. There is now a chance to bring these paths together. But the discussion has to happen here on the Apache OpenOffi

Re: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

Hi Dave; --- Mer 21/12/11, Dave Fisher ha scritto: ... > Pavel, > > Thank you for your perspective. I think a properly released > OpenOffice.org 3.3.1 is totally possible.. I recall Martin > came to the list with the idea. We took separate paths. OOo 3.3.1 is impossible, We only release stuff u

Re: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

Hi all, as I have only susbcried around a months ago because I found TOOo messaging about donations and source code sponsors suspicious, I still get the impression that they are somehow not "playing with open cards". So as TOOo asked for clear feedback in the other thread, I just thought I'd throw

Re: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

Sorry for the formatting, I'll try again if it comes out better now; I'm not such a computer expert as all the developers on the list :-). - Hi all, as I have only susbcried around a months ago because I found TOOo messaging about donations and source code sponsors suspicious, I still get t

So - anyone want to talk about Apache OpenOffice...

Howdy, Lot's of stuff breezing around, huh? OK - so it appears 'we' have made a public announcement of a 1st quarter release...cool. Guess it's time to actually decide on some of the issues Graham has been so articulate in presenting. Do we want to talk branding on this list or back on the Mark

Re: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

Hi Pedro, Hi Pedro, On Dec 21, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi Dave; > > --- Mer 21/12/11, Dave Fisher ha scritto: > ... >> Pavel, >> >> Thank you for your perspective. I think a properly released >> OpenOffice.org 3.3.1 is totally possible.. I recall Martin >> came to the list wit

Re: [code] Notes on the Windows version

On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 19:13 +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 12/19/11 6:23 PM, eric b wrote: > > Hello the list, > > > > > > > > Here is a copy-paste of some notes I wrote for the Windows version. If I > > remember correctly, there are some Oracle traces remaining, mostly when > > using the MSI. >

Re: old colored vs new monochrome icons

On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 10:48 +0100, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 12/17/2011 10:20 AM, schrieb Gianluca Turconi: > > In data 17 dicembre 2011 alle ore 03:08:55, Rob Weir > > ha scritto: > > > >> So if each application installs its own icons, then of course icons > >> will be application-specific. Needs

Re: So - anyone want to talk about Apache OpenOffice...

Hi Drew, et al., On 2011-12-21, at 20:34 , drew wrote: > Howdy, > > Lot's of stuff breezing around, huh? > > OK - so it appears 'we' have made a public announcement of a 1st quarter > release...cool. > > Guess it's time to actually decide on some of the issues Graham has been > so articulate i

Re: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

On 2011-12-21 8:28 PM, Thomas Horn wrote: Sorry for the formatting, I'll try again if it comes out better now; I'm not such a computer expert as all the developers on the list :-). Thank you, Thomas, for speaking up! Many of the mentors do realize that the ooo-dev@ list can be quite daunting

RE: [code] Notes on the Windows version

You can also look at this and identify proposed modifications point-by-point (or by cross-referencing) on this wiki page: . I'm going to blend in Eric's comments and also link to a bugzilla issue already raised on this theme

Re: So - anyone want to talk about Apache OpenOffice...

On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 21:18 -0500, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > Hi Drew, et al., > > On 2011-12-21, at 20:34 , drew wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > Lot's of stuff breezing around, huh? > > > > OK - so it appears 'we' have made a public announcement of a 1st quarter > > release...cool. > > > > Guess

RE: [code] Notes on the Windows version

On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 18:56 -0800, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > You can also look at this and identify proposed modifications point-by-point > (or by cross-referencing) on this wiki page: > . > > I'm going to blend in Eric's c

RE: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

I don't know where this fits in this thread, if anywhere, but I can't resist. 1. When I first saw the name, White Label Office, what came to mind was "generic" office. There was a brief time when generic (and bulk) branding of staples became the rage in supermarkets. The typical white-label

Re: [WWW] new term for old "accepted" projects

Am Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2011 schrieb Kay Schenk : > Hi all-- > > I was just looking at /projects/accepted.html on > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/ > > with the intention of changing the links to the relative treatment we're > using now when I see that Dav

Re: [WWW] new term for old "accepted" projects

On Dec 21, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2011 schrieb Kay Schenk : >> Hi all-- >> >> I was just looking at /projects/accepted.html on >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/ >> >> with the intention of changing the lin

[WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks!

Hi Everyone, The http:ooo-site.apache.org version of www.openoffice.org is ready for review before migration. There are several last issues for people to review. (1) What news stories should we have on ooo-site.apache.org ready for migration on /index.html? (2) /mail_lists.html needs review an

RE: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks!

-Original Message- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 22:55 To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator Subject: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks! Hi Everyone, The http:ooo-site.apache.org version of www.openoffice.org is ready for review bef

Re: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks!

On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 22:55 > To: OOo-dev Apache Incubator > Subject: [WWW] Changeover is Close - Final Tasks! > > Hi Everyone, > >

Re: Team OpenOffice White Label Office (powered by Apache Open Office)

> I understand this as some form of taking revenge on Oracle (but this > might only be my interpretation), which, I think, anybody in the > community should avoid at all, given the generous move of Oracle to > donate OpenOffice.org to ASF. This exactly is "seeing only one side of the coin" I wrote