e build script?
-Rob
> - first fallback is apache-exrtras
>
> - second fallback (will be removed shortly) is the SVN repository.
>
> -Andre
>
>
>> What if we bundled the cat-a dependencies in the source tarball?
>> Would that work? Same net downloads, but the bandwid
he.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120425
Thanks.
From: Rob Weir
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
(incubating)
I plan on testing the Release Candidate 3.4.1 on WinX
e.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/
>>>> we will be in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice or something
>>>> like that.
>>>>
>>>> So those who have downloaded the AOO 3.4.1. source tarball will find
>>>> that their script breaks.
>>>
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:03 AM, imacat wrote:
>> On 01.08.02 11:33am, Yan Ji said:
>>> Hi imacat,
>>>
>>> Arielch removed the previous RC build, so you cannot continue loading
>>> linux package anymore. The new RC build is uploading now, plea
raduation during which both URLs are valid.
>
> -Andre
>
>
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>>
>>> Andre
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120425
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>
On 31 July 2012 14:59, O.Felka wrote:
> Am 31.07.2012 15:45, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
>
>> The only issue I saw is that when we install over 3.3.0 or 3.4.0, we
>> leave behind the older version's unpacked files on the desktop, the
>> files from the earlier install. Those files could be deleted to save
On 01.08.02 04:31pm, Jürgen Schmidt said:
> On 8/2/12 6:03 AM, imacat wrote:
>> On 01.08.02 11:33am, Yan Ji said:
>>> Hi imacat,
>>>
>>> Arielch removed the previous RC build, so you cannot continue loading
>>> linux package anymore. The new RC build is uploading now, please hold on
>>> your
/repos/asf/openoffice or something
>>>> like that.
>>>>
>>>> So those who have downloaded the AOO 3.4.1. source tarball will find
>>>> that their script breaks.
>>>>
>>>> -Rob
>>>>
>>>>
>>>&
gt; So instead of being in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/
>>>> we will be in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice or something
>>>> like that.
>>>>
>>>> So those who have downloaded the AOO 3.4.1. source tarball will find
>>&g
SCUSS]: Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
(incubating)
I plan on testing the Release Candidate 3.4.1 on WinXP/SP3, and
verifying installing over OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0 and LO 3.5.5.
It would be good if others could mention what they intend to look at,
so we can avoid unnecessary duplication of effort.
Als
; that their script breaks.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>>
>>> Andre
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120425
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>&g
?id=120425
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Rob Weir
>>>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:17 PM
t;
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ________
>>> From: Rob Weir
>>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:17 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release Apache Open
://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120425
Thanks.
From: Rob Weir
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating)
I plan on testing the Release Candidate 3.4.1
Am 01.08.2012 02:52s, schrieb Ji Yan:
Is there any possibility to unpack installation files to system temporary
folder. so that system will clean these temp files regularly.
The installation files are not temporary files, they are needed for
maintenance mode. It's not helpful to delete them.
Is there any possibility to unpack installation files to system temporary
folder. so that system will clean these temp files regularly.
2012/7/31 O.Felka
> Am 31.07.2012 15:45, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
>
> The only issue I saw is that when we install over 3.3.0 or 3.4.0, we
>> leave behind the older
Am 31.07.2012 15:45, schrieb Rob Weir:
The only issue I saw is that when we install over 3.3.0 or 3.4.0, we
leave behind the older version's unpacked files on the desktop, the
files from the earlier install. Those files could be deleted to save
disk space. But this is not a regression and is n
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> I plan on testing the Release Candidate 3.4.1 on WinXP/SP3, and
> verifying installing over OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0 and LO 3.5.5.
>
I tested these over-install scenarios. They look good.
The only issue I saw is that when we install over 3.3.0 or
2012/7/30 Kay Schenk :
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> I plan on testing the Release Candidate 3.4.1 on WinXP/SP3, and
>> verifying installing over OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0 and LO 3.5.5.
>>
>> It would be good if others could mention what they intend to look at,
>> so we can a
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> I plan on testing the Release Candidate 3.4.1 on WinXP/SP3, and
> verifying installing over OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0 and LO 3.5.5.
>
> It would be good if others could mention what they intend to look at,
> so we can avoid unnecessary duplication of
.
>
> From: Rob Weir
>To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:17 PM
>Subject: Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating)
>
>I plan on testing the Release Candidate 3.4.1 on WinXP/SP3, and
>verifying installing over OOo
I plan on testing the Release Candidate 3.4.1 on WinXP/SP3, and
verifying installing over OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0 and LO 3.5.5.
It would be good if others could mention what they intend to look at,
so we can avoid unnecessary duplication of effort.
Also, is the RAT scan results online anywhere? It
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a further note for our PPMC members. I have started the vote for 3.4.1
> with this email and the vote should happen on the public ooo-dev mailing
> list. Any QA efforts can and should continue during the voting process.
> We should
23 matches
Mail list logo
