>
> >
> > QA list is definitely *not* for reporting bugs. Maybe ooo-users?
>
> I'd agree, though I would encourage those folks directly active with
> user communication (on the different user ML/Forums) to subscribe to it,
> so that information does get out efficiently.
>
> For right now, fo
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 23:06 +0200, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > Christoph Jopp wrote:
> >>
> >> There still seems to be a misunderstanding. ...
> >>
> >> The other thing was that with announcing and publishing Beta Versions
> >> and Release Candida
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>
>> There still seems to be a misunderstanding. ...
>>
>> The other thing was that with announcing and publishing Beta Versions
>> and Release Candidates also people without a close connection to the
>> project were
Christoph Jopp wrote:
There still seems to be a misunderstanding. ...
The other thing was that with announcing and publishing Beta Versions
and Release Candidates also people without a close connection to the
project were attracted to "test" or maybe better to "try out" the new
version. And their
There still seems to be a misunderstanding.
Am 19.04.2012 14:44, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 19/04/2012 Christoph Jopp wrote:
>> Plus, I think you will find more people to take part in bug hunting
>> (fun) than doing "disciplined" QA (work).
>
> Not necessarily. Contrary to what people might th
On 19/04/2012 Christoph Jopp wrote:
Plus, I think you will find more people to take part in bug hunting
(fun) than doing "disciplined" QA (work).
Not necessarily. Contrary to what people might think, the "community" QA
activities have traditionally been very structured: each volunteer
receive
Am 19.04.2012 11:57, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 19.04.2012 11:08, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
Am 19.04.2012 08:19, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 A
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.04.2012 11:08, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 19.04.2012 08:19, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.0
Am 19.04.2012 11:08, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 19.04.2012 08:19, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
Am 18.04.2012 23:01, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM
On 19.04.2012 17:32, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 19.04.2012 17:08, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Christoph Joppwrote:
Am 19.04.2012 08:19, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Joppwrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 19.04.2012 17:08, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 19.04.2012 08:19, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>
>
>
>>
On 19.04.2012 17:08, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
Am 19.04.2012 08:19, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
Am 18.04.2012 23:01, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
Am
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.04.2012 08:19, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 18.04.2012 23:01, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.04
Am 19.04.2012 08:19, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 18.04.2012 23:01, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.04.2012 23:01, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 201
I don't think anyone offered to help, despite these
several requests :-(
I think that it has slipped your attention that I've made lot of tests
with the old vcl testtool.
Groetjes,
Olaf
On 4/18/12 10:16 PM, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
when providing an OOo snapshot as a release candidate binaries were
signed. Will this be the case with the first RC provided for AOO ?
Kind regards, Joost
when you mean if we can sign the windows binary with an official Apache
certificate to avoi
On 04/18/2012 03:51 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Rob Weir:
we want to be
testing much earlier in the project cycle. That is why Lily sent
several notes to the list, months ago, asking for help testing AOO dev
snapshots. I don't think anyone offered to help, despite these
several requests :-(
Rob Weir:
> we want to be
> testing much earlier in the project cycle. That is why Lily sent
> several notes to the list, months ago, asking for help testing AOO dev
> snapshots. I don't think anyone offered to help, despite these
> several requests :-(
Around 20 volunteers from the Italian comm
Am 18.04.2012 23:01, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Michael, I am cu
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>>> wrote:
Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availabilit
Hi,
when providing an OOo snapshot as a release candidate binaries were
signed. Will this be the case with the first RC provided for AOO ?
Kind regards, Joost
Am 18.04.2012 19:38, schrieb Christoph Jopp:
>
>
> Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>>> wrote:
Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of
>>
Am 18.04.2012 19:17, schrieb Kay Schenk:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>> wrote:
>>> Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of
>> an AOO 3.4 Release Candidate.
>>>
>>> 1. What does it s
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
> > Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of
> an AOO 3.4 Release Candidate.
> >
> > 1. What does it say to you when a project build set is designated a
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of an
> AOO 3.4 Release Candidate.
>
> 1. What does it say to you when a project build set is designated a "Release
> Candidate"?
>
> 2. What use would you make of
Michael, I am curious what has you be interested in the availability of an AOO
3.4 Release Candidate.
1. What does it say to you when a project build set is designated a "Release
Candidate"?
2. What use would you make of such a designated build different from a
developer snapshot and an actu
s.
-Rob
> - Dennis
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 16:32
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Has the AOO 3.4 RC been released?
>
> On 4/17/12 8:35 PM, Michael
or.apache.org
Subject: Re: Has the AOO 3.4 RC been released?
On 4/17/12 8:35 PM, Michael Acevedo wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if the AOO 3.4 Release Candidate is now available for
download? I see an entry in the Wiki that says so.
Many Thanks
The RC will be announced here on the list at least.
gt;
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 16:32
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Has the AOO 3.4 RC been released?
>
> On 4/17/12 8:35 PM, Michael Acevedo wrote:
>> Hi,
essage-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 16:32
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Has the AOO 3.4 RC been released?
On 4/17/12 8:35 PM, Michael Acevedo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if the AOO 3.4 Release Candidate is now
On 4/17/12 8:35 PM, Michael Acevedo wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if the AOO 3.4 Release Candidate is now available for
download? I see an entry in the Wiki that says so.
Many Thanks
The RC will be announced here on the list at least. The wiki was
prepared already but we have found a further i
32 matches
Mail list logo
