Hi Ian,
Was this ever resolved? I think we had it on hold pending transfer of
the trademarks to Apache. Now that this has occurred, did you want to
renew your request?
-Rob
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 June 2011 02:30, Rob Weir
On 28 June 2011 02:30, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org
wrote:
Just in case other folks missed the tie-in between the different threads:
branding and trademark policy for all Apache projects is handled on the
Just in case other folks missed the tie-in between the different
threads: branding and trademark policy for all Apache projects is
handled on the privately archived tradema...@apache.org mailing list.
Apache policy is set by the VP, Brand Management and the associated
officer's committee, and
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Just in case other folks missed the tie-in between the different threads:
branding and trademark policy for all Apache projects is handled on the
privately archived tradema...@apache.org mailing list. Apache policy is
Hi Ian,
Any luck raising the trademark issue with Apache Branding?
-Rob
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Thanks, Ian.
I don't see anything in the Apache trademark policy [1] that talks
about training certificates. But it does say that use of the
On 16 June 2011 19:27, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
SERMONETTE
I know, in my case, this will take some awkward and uncomfortable
transformation of how I see myself in the context of coordinated activities.
I'm already seeing, on the PPMC, that it takes something to
I read, there is no single vision on how PMCs should run a project and
the communities they host. So I think the OpenOffice.org community can
create or better bring in its own customary constitution even it's
hosted by Apache.
OpenOffice.org is a little bit different from other Apache
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:47 AM, IngridvdM ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
I am really in favor of going without anyone being named leader or manager
or any name that could create the impression that this person has more
rights than the others. Maybe we can choose 'contact' as a neutral
Am 16.06.2011 13:29, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
I am really in favor of going without anyone being named leader or manager
or any name that could create the impression that this person has more
rights than the others. Maybe we can choose 'contact' as a neutral
description in case something
On 16/06/2011 12:44, RA Stehmann wrote:
Sam Ruby schrieb:
The only 'contact' that people need for this project is
ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org.
I don't think so. If for example the press wants to know, what's new in
OpenOffice.org version x.y, you cann't say, ask at ooo-dev ... . They
need
On 16/06/2011 12:52, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 16 June 2011 12:00, Sam Rubyru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:47 AM, IngridvdMingrid...@gmx-topmail.de
wrote:
I am really in favor of going without anyone being named leader or
manager
or any name that could create the
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:44 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Sam Ruby schrieb:
The only 'contact' that people need for this project is
ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org.
I don't think so. If for example the press wants to know, what's new in
OpenOffice.org version x.y, you
Hi Sam, *,
2011/6/16 Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:47 AM, IngridvdM ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
I am really in favor of going without anyone being named leader or manager
or any name that could create the impression that this person has more
rights than the
On 16 June 2011 14:04, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:49, Ian Lynch wrote:
But presumably if we want broader community support this list is the place
to get it? I will talk to the trademark committee but I feel happier if
this
is as public as possible.
Ahhh... I
On 16/06/2011 14:08, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 16 June 2011 14:04, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
...
Sam has effectively done that in his reply to this thread that was copied
to the trademarks PMC. Trademarks will assess the situation and respond via
both the trademarks and this list.
Sam has effectively done that in his reply to this thread that was copied
to the trademarks PMC. Trademarks will assess the situation and respond
via
both the trademarks and this list.
Ok, thanks. I think it is important that ordinary members have an
opportunity to comment either one
I think we shouldn't invent the wheel twice ;-).
The OpenOffice.org community has an more or less good working
infrastructure of leads, contact persons, native lang communities,
teams, mailing lists, websites etc..
IMO we should make an inventory, keep the usefull elements and drop the
dated.
On 16 June 2011 14:23, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, still learning. Hopefully this process will help other newbies too.
:-)
+1
To this I'd like to add that already having only scanned and dipped
into some of the conversations I've already learned an enormous
amount.
Excellent.
On 16 June 2011 14:27, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
I think we shouldn't invent the wheel twice ;-).
The OpenOffice.org community has an more or less good working
infrastructure of leads, contact persons, native lang communities,
teams, mailing lists, websites etc..
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
I think we shouldn't invent the wheel twice ;-).
The OpenOffice.org community has an more or less good working
infrastructure of leads, contact persons, native lang communities,
teams, mailing lists, websites
2011/6/16 Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
I think we shouldn't invent the wheel twice ;-).
The OpenOffice.org community has an more or less good working
infrastructure of leads, contact persons, native lang
Hi Manfred
Am 16.06.11 14:47, schrieb Manfred A. Reiter:
Hi Sam, *,
Is it intended from NewOOo to deliver final products to the market?
If yes,
than IMHO we should think *right now*
about an infrastructure for these parts of the project.
else ...
Or do you think that there are too many
Hi,
Von: Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com
to have an idea ... these are the current mailinglists
in the OOo ... german subdomain.
annou...@de.openoffice.org
d...@de.openoffice.org
us...@de.openoffice.org
c...@de.openoffice.org
iss...@de.openoffice.org
upps ...
2011/6/16 Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org:
[...]
IMHO that was the question from Kazunari Hirano.
https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#label/...ApacheOOo/13092fd2961dd406
Unfortunately his has now answer until now.
That link is no use to people not using GMail, I can't see the
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
I think we shouldn't invent the wheel twice ;-).
The OpenOffice.org community has an more or less good working
infrastructure of leads,
Hi Manfred A. Reiter san,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
But IMHO each national project should start with at least a userlist
and a list to organise the national needs ;-)
Good idea.
:)
Can we say language project instead of national project?
Hi André,
nice to see you ;-)
2011/6/16 Andre Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
Hi,
Von: Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com
[...]
at the beginning the geramanophone branche of OOo startet with only
*two* mailinglist
all the others where created according to the needs of the German
Hi Kazunari Hirano san,
2011/6/16 Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com:
Hi Manfred A. Reiter san,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com
wrote:
But IMHO each national project should start with at least a userlist
and a list to organise the national needs ;-)
that, but separate
lists are very effective, because they don't depend on complex subject-line
rituals.)
-Original Message-
From: IngridvdM [mailto:ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 03:47
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Teams and Leads (was: Proposed short
+1
(I also favor not solving a problem we don't have [yet].)
-Original Message-
From: IngridvdM [mailto:ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 04:15
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Teams and Leads (was: Proposed short term goals)
Am 16.06.2011 13:00
to be said.]
-Original Message-
From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 01:42
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Teams and Leads (was: Proposed short term goals)
I read, there is no single vision on how PMCs should run a project
Hi Dennis,
2011/6/16 Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org:
+1
(I also favor not solving a problem we don't have [yet].)
what you are talking about, I hope you are not
reffering on the following email
Am 16.06.2011 21:15, schrieb Greg Stein:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:44, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
...
In a bigger community you need some structure to work efficiently (see
for an example the Debian project).
Wow. I never thought I would see Debian and efficient in
On 16 June 2011 15:06, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Ian, do you have a link to a sample certificate, so we can see the
trademark used in context?
There is a scan of a sample certificate at
https://theingots.org/community/OOoCert
The bar code on this just encodes to the web site
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
It might be worth describing how national language projects and the
OpenOffce NLC has worked in the past. I think this would be
educational for our Apache mentors to understand a little of what they
do. It is much more than
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jomar Silva [mailto:homem...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 16:04
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Teams and Leads
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
[ ... ]
2) Have the national language projects run
36 matches
Mail list logo
