Re: [Oorexx-devel] TestUnit Output from ooRexx on zLinux

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:33 AM, David Ashley > wrote: > >> I built from the branch on Thursday morning. Both the i386 and zLinux >> versions are running the same code base. > > I'm rebuilding with an updated beta branch now, then I'll run

Re: [Oorexx-devel] TestUnit Output from ooRexx on zLinux

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:33 AM, David Ashley wrote: > I built from the branch on Thursday morning. Both the i386 and zLinux > versions are running the same code base. David, On Fedora Core 10 32-bit. I just ran the test suite with both the beta 4802 build and a trunk build. Neither runs had

Re: [Oorexx-devel] TestUnit Output from ooRexx on zLinux

2009-06-19 Thread David Ashley
17950 Assertions: 552529 Failures:34 Errors: 1 Skipped files: 11 [failure] [20090619 11:44:26.301373] svn:r4693 Change date: 2009-05-17 15:21:25 -0700 Test: TEST_MANY_CHARS_BIN Class: CHAROUT.testGroup File: /tmp/oorex

Re: [Oorexx-devel] TestUnit Output from ooRexx on zLinux

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
MT) 6.03 18 Jun 2009 > Addressing Mode: 64 > ooRexxUnit: 2.0.0_3.2.0 ooTest: 1.0.0_4.0.0 > > Tests ran: 17950 > Assertions: 552529 > Failures:34 > Errors: 1 > Skipped files: 11 > > [failure] [20090619

Re: [Oorexx-devel] TestUnit Output from ooRexx on zLinux

2009-06-19 Thread Rick McGuire
   2.0.0_3.2.0     ooTest: 1.0.0_4.0.0 > > Tests ran:           17950 > Assertions:          552529 > Failures:            34 > Errors:              1 > Skipped files:       11 > > [failure] [20090619 11:44:26.301373] >  svn:    r4693   Change date: 2009-05-17 15:21:25 -0700 &g

[Oorexx-devel] TestUnit Output from ooRexx on zLinux

2009-06-19 Thread David Ashley
2009 Addressing Mode: 64 ooRexxUnit: 2.0.0_3.2.0 ooTest: 1.0.0_4.0.0 Tests ran: 17950 Assertions: 552529 Failures:34 Errors: 1 Skipped files: 11 [failure] [20090619 11:44:26.301373] svn:r4693 Change date: 2009-05-17 15:21:25 -0700

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RexxDoc - Asking for your thoughts

2009-06-19 Thread Rick McGuire
I've had to deal with SourceForge and CodeHaus, and I've generally found SourceForge to be easier to deal with. Rick On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Geoff Stevens wrote: >> On Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:23 PM, >> Geoff Stevens wrote: >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RexxDoc - Asking for your thoughts

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Geoff Stevens wrote: > On Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:23 PM, > Geoff Stevens wrote: > >> You wait for years for one of these things, then two come along at >> once :-) >> >> Realistically I'll be a couple of weeks dealing with the >> ... > > Yeah, developer esti

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RexxDoc - Asking for your thoughts

2009-06-19 Thread Geoff Stevens
On Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:23 PM, Geoff Stevens wrote: > You wait for years for one of these things, then two come along at > once :-) > > Realistically I'll be a couple of weeks dealing with the > licence/management issues, then I hope be able to send you a copy to > examine. I think you'l