Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

I think the documentation pointers should point to Sourceforge https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/ with the appropriate subfolder renamed (currently 5.0.0beta) The documentation can be built automatically

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Ok all, I'm going to start triage on the bugs, documentation and task tickets on SourceForge, I'm going to ask for a freeze sometime in the near future.  I'd like to ask all creators of tickets to examine them and mark any in milestone 5.0.0 that are not showstoppers to change the milestone

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

On the topic of documentation... I don't want to connect the website issues as showstoppers for a 5.0 GA release, but... All of the documentation pointers in oorexx.org/doc result in 404 errors.  If memory serves (and sometimes it doesn't, corrections gratefully received) we now have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Dear René > Am 21.06.2022 um 13:57 schrieb René Jansen : > > 2) Mac installer missing (now a dmg installer is there) The reason we cannot build a pkg installer is because Apple decided to remove the command-line support for it. In my eyes the .dmg installer is NOT a showstopper. What would be

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

This from 2019. I will finish the website shortly. (This week). I am against a freeze, as I've got some changes in the works that I'd really like to get into the 5.0 release. Rick On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:46 AM René Jansen wrote: > I am for it, but I think it is up to Erich and Rick. > > To

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

This from 2018: On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 8:21 AM Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Almost a month has passed since my last posting, so assuming that everyone > is just in "wait and see" > mode. Therefore throwing another stone into the water: how about releasing > the current 5.0 Beta this > coming

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Another thing was documentation. There has been a lot of work done by Gil (and Jon and P.O. - afraid I am forgetting someone). > On 21 Jun 2022, at 13:57, René Jansen wrote: > > Hi Terry, > > I am happy that you are taking this up. Yes, there was a list some time ago; > Jon and P.O. might

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Hi Terry, I am happy that you are taking this up. Yes, there was a list some time ago; Jon and P.O. might have done better bookkeeping - I cannot find it now. From memory: 1) Website very outdated 2) Mac installer missing (now a dmg installer is there) 3) Some showstoppers yet (cannot

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Greetings again ooRexx'ers, Also on the topic of reminding what needs completing to release ooRexx v5.0... Terry Fuller wrote: Is there a list somewhere of showstoppers which are preventing 5.0 from going GA? If so, can someone point me to it? If not, can I serve as a clearinghouse for

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Greetings ooRexx'ers, On the topic of reminding what needs completing to release ooRexx v5.0... Terry Fuller wrote: Is there a list somewhere of showstoppers which are preventing 5.0 from going GA? If so, can someone point me to it? If not, can I serve as a clearinghouse for reports of