Re: [Oorexx-devel] Advice on ooDialog ...

2010-11-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
l ooDialog questions on those venues. Really the oorexx-users mailing list would be good for anyone not wishing to join RexxLA, but it is not widely used. Still, I watch it and would quickly answer any ooDialog questions, if they were asked. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problems with ooRexx 3.2 (sic!) on Windows 7 and a question about "ooRexx-WSH"

2010-11-20 Thread Mark Miesfeld
he list as to a need to find a developer, or developers, with the time, interest in, and level of skill, needed to do the task. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards fo

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx internal doc ?

2010-11-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Jean-Louis, I'm certainly in favor of a DocBook on how the internals of ooRexx work. -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote: > There is a skeleton "InternalClasses" in the wiki, currently empty. > Is there other sites I'm

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [RexxLA] Announcing ooRexx 4.1.0 Beta 1

2010-11-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
directory names have a triangle next to them. Click on triangle to open, or close up, the individual directories. Drill down to: oorexx -> 4.1.0.beta to see the current list of packages available for the 4.1.0 beta. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad Windows installer, dialogs, mimetype definition ... (Re: Beta 4.1: no fiel-association for ".rex" ?

2010-11-07 Thread Mark Miesfeld
nsus from the developers, or the users, that this is something that *should* be done. I have no objection to it, and would implement it, if I felt it was something the users, or the developers, really wanted. -- Mark Miesfeld --

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Beta 4.1: no fiel-association for ".rex" ?

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
l, and want to change the intended behaviour, then that can be done. -- Mark Miesfeld -- The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Beta 4.1: no fiel-association for ".rex" ?

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
uninstall program knows exactly what those settings are, since those settings can (and do) change. The uninstall is written as part of the install. It is at that point, and only at that point, that you can be sure of what the installer is doing. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Beta 4.1: no fiel-association for ".rex" ?

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > On 06.11.2010 16:09, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > > send me the file as an attachment. Just send it to my g-mail account, > or open a bug and attach the file to the bug. > > Unfortunately, that is not possible. One can mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Beta 4.1: no fiel-association for ".rex" ?

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
nish the install, with none of the check boxes checked, no file association will be created and the editor setting is of course not done. (Setting the editor requires at least one file association.) -- Mark Miesfeld --

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Beta 4.1: no fiel-association for ".rex" ?

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
ctory itself), if that makes a difference. Do you mean by this that you have run the uninstall / install mulitiple times with the same results? -- Mark Miesfeld -- The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ready for 4.1.0 beta

2010-11-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:17 PM, David Ashley wrote: >  I'm ok with putting things on SF. I will start adding things after tonight's > builds. Good, that's the plan then. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Nokia

[Oorexx-devel] Ready for 4.1.0 beta

2010-11-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
s going and put the builds on SourceForge tonight. It's a beta after all and really things are at least 99.9% ready. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx installation directory

2010-11-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
e. > and certainly a final release before the Christmas holidays. Definitely, barring any unforseen events. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create ne

Re: [Oorexx-devel] current ooRexx 4.1 on AIX 64 bit

2010-11-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
1 NOT the test suite in trunk: https://oorexx.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/oorexx/test/trunk I think some people may be forgetting 4.1.0 is branched from the 4.0.1 release, not branched from trunk. If you still get the errors using the 4.0.1 test suite, then let us know. -- Mark Mi

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.1.0 Draft Documents

2010-10-31 Thread Mark Miesfeld
own words. If the english is a little off, I'll rephrase some things for you. Really, getting the doc started is half the battle. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.1.0 Draft Documents

2010-10-30 Thread Mark Miesfeld
we start the beta without the doc and add a skeleton chapter on it when someone has the time and / or inclination. It might even be something you want to do Jean-Louis, you seem to have an interest in xsl processing. -- Mark Miesfeld ---

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Start 4.1.0 beta soon

2010-10-29 Thread Mark Miesfeld
That sounds good David. I'm thinking Monday, or whenever after that you have time. I'm hoping to have the last updates done by Sunday. -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17 AM, David Ashley wrote: >  All - > > Just let me know when you are ready and I will produ

[Oorexx-devel] Start 4.1.0 beta soon

2010-10-29 Thread Mark Miesfeld
les. They are both started, just need to be finished up. The ReadMe.pdf doc still needs some work. I started that, will try to finish up over the weekend. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.1.0 Draft Documents

2010-10-28 Thread Mark Miesfeld
ase items pretty cleaned up. Every thing going in the 4.1.0 release is marked as 'pending' and 'next release.' If you do a filter on those, you should see all the relevant items. Feel free to update the CHANGES file. Anything you can

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.1.0 Draft Documents

2010-10-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
I like it better that way in the PDF, and in the html, I like it a lot better. So, I'm glad you went ahead and committed the changes. -- Mark Miesfeld. -- Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.1.0 Draft Documents

2010-10-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Jean-Louis, I just did a quick test, and I agree with David. I'm all for the change. I'd never looked at the html docs before. It seems all the tables look bad. -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote: > >> * This bug:  3028787  O

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.1.0 Draft Documents

2010-10-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
looks to be a problem with jade maybe. SlickEdit reports no end tag for colspec. The online Doc book reference shows colspec like this: in the xml we have: But, if I add the / making it: Then jade reporst an error. So, I'm guessing that's why things don't work in the HTML ve

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.1.0 Draft Documents

2010-10-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:36 AM, David Ashley wrote: >  The old scheme. There is some work to do to convert the docs which I don't > want to tackle until after the 4.1.0 release. Okay, that sounds the most reasonable. -- Ma

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.1.0 Draft Documents

2010-10-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Is this still using the old doc build process, or RenderX? -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:11 AM, David Ashley wrote: >  All - > > This morning I build the first draft documentation for ooRexx 4.1.0. You can > fin > it here > > http://build.oorexx.org/buil

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New Processing for ooRexx Documents

2010-10-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:35 AM, David Ashley > wrote: > >> After much frustration, I finally have a potential replacement for the DSSSL ... > > In addition, after I read the RenderX license, I was not convinced &

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New Processing for ooRexx Documents

2010-10-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
ense, I was not convinced that the license was geared to Open Source developers as Jean-Louis thought. I think the licensing would need to be looked at closely. But, I have no objection to moving to this if others think we should. It's no secret that I don't like certain things about our cu

Re: [Oorexx-devel] More authoritative discussion on new rpms

2010-10-20 Thread Mark Miesfeld
X 2.x ln -sf %{_prefix}/lib/ooRexx/librexxapi.so.%{orx_libversion} /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.2 -- Mark Miesfeld > > David Ashley > > On 10/19/2010 10:15 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Mark Miesfeld  wrote: >> >>> 1.)  The dlopen test fails under

[Oorexx-devel] Debian and /usr/lib64

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
plus anything in ld.so.conf (rather than /lib and /usr/lib plus anything in ld.so.conf which is what vanilla upstream libtool does). Debian use /lib and /usr/lib on all architectures" So I think on Debian 64-bit we should just put the libraries in /usr/lib/ooRexx. -- Mar

Re: [Oorexx-devel] More authoritative discussion on new rpms

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > 1.)  The dlopen test fails under 4.1.0 from trunk and works with the > released 4.0.1, on Fedora Core 13 64-bit > > 2.) Building the external binaries for the test suite fails under > 4.1.0 from trunk and works with the relea

[Oorexx-devel] More authoritative discussion on new rpms

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Hi David, So, I was at a disadvantage in the earlier discussion because I didn't have access to a Fedora system, and hadn't had a chance yet to test thoroughly. Because of that I couldn't be sure of my facts. But, now I've had a chance to look at this more closely, and the same two problems I lis

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problem with Linux rpm installs

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
e doing on Fedora, SuSE, etc.. Don't you? I'll get that fixed up. But the basic question is, should the installed files go in the same place, /usr/lib/ooRexx etc.? -- Mark Miesfeld -- Download new Adobe(R) Fla

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problem with Linux rpm installs

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
es. But apparently not. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications t

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problem with Linux rpm installs

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
experience on Fedora leads me to suspect that it may not be sufficient on other Linux distributions. I'll fix the debian build, but that's why I started this conversation, to see if symbolic links, or adding a file to /etc/ld.so.conf.d, was the "corr

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problem with Linux rpm installs

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
rrors: 0 Exceptions: 1 Skipped files: 0 Messages:0 Logs:1 Total time: 00:00:01.777142 :~/work/tools/wc/ooTest/4.x$ So, see, someone is testing your builds. They just are getting different results than you are. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problem with Linux rpm installs

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
and see which approach you were "supposed" to use. On my Kubuntu system, there is only one file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d, so I was thinking that adding a file to that directory was not used. Creating symlinks is easy enough in the script and was what we did before. -- Mark Miesfeld -

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problem with Linux rpm installs

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
g a Google search also seemed to point to the conclusion that symbolic links needed to be created. I started with debian documentation though, where the writers seem to be adverse to stating things simply. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
xtensions were set up. Now they can do whatever they want. As to assigning a lot of different extensions to a ftype, well I'd prefer to leave that up to the user. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Download new Adobe(R) Fla

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
tension? That's a great comment. I rewrote the screens so that you only need to enter the editor once. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(

[Oorexx-devel] Problem with Linux rpm installs

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
h existing make files would need to redo them. You're the expert here, but don't the symbolic links still need to be created in /usr/lib? -- Mark Miesfeld -- Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new

[Oorexx-devel] Updated Windows Installer / Windows build(s) on Build machine

2010-10-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
good. The build machine has the Linux builds on it already. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Docs RPM

2010-10-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
for it is what you have done, putting it up on a web page. On a sort of contrary note, I'm not sure I'd bother with downloading a rpm, I'd probably just download the zipped PDF docs. -- Mark Miesfeld --

Re: [Oorexx-devel] If we were to install the PDF doc on Linux ... ?

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > A completely un-related question. > > It seems to me in older installations, you could launch rexxtry from > the command line on Linux.  I just noticed in 4.1.0 you can't if you > install from a deb package.  Not sure

[Oorexx-devel] If we were to install the PDF doc on Linux ... ?

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Miesfeld
kage. Not sure what happens using a rpm package, I only have access to a Kubuntu system at present. Since you are now putting the executables in /usr/bin, I think you should either put rexxtry there also, or link to it. Which ever is appropriate. -

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Test failures concerning stems

2010-10-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > Yep, I see the problem.  I forgot that the default value is that > determined by the NOVALUE handler, which uses the provided name. > Needed to tweak things a little. Thanks. -- Mark

[Oorexx-devel] 4.1.0 doc branch created

2010-10-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
David / Rick In case you miss the svn message, I've branched the 4.1.0 docs from trunk. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMASc

[Oorexx-devel] Test failures concerning stems

2010-10-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
ssertSame("FOOBAR.1", setStem.1) and the METHOD.testGroup looks like: self~TestSetObjectVariable('setStem.', .stem~new("FOOBAR.")) testGroup~assertSame("FOOBAR.", setStem.[]) testGroup~assertSame("FOOBAR.1", setStem.1) -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] Need to branch docs for 4.1.0

2010-10-09 Thread Mark Miesfeld
done, it may be already doc'd in trunk. Not sure though if there is some doc in trunk for stuff that will not be in 4.1.0? If we branch from trunk, it is easy enough for me to fix the ooDialog doc. David if you feel like doing the branch, go for i

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Broken download link from

2010-10-09 Thread Mark Miesfeld
ld be reported to the RexxLA webmaster. -- Mark Miesfeld On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Hi there, > > The download link from <http://www.oorexx.org/download.html> is broken, > if choosing download Windows 3.2.0, which points to > <http://sourcefo

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine - Windows builds

2010-10-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
David, That sounds good. As I recall, when you first posted the problem with the Windows, you said that the build worked fine when you ran it manually. That you only got the error when you ran it automated. Is that still the case? -- Mark Miesfeld On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:33 AM, David Ashley

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Win 7 64 bit ooRexx Builds

2010-10-03 Thread Mark Miesfeld
th if you installed into a directory with spaces in it. You can also cross-compile, compile the 64-bit version in a 32-bit Windows, etc.. But I usually have a 32-bit system right next to a 64-bit system so I never bothered to try it. -- Mark Miesfeld -

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
All, I placed Windows installation packages on the build machine: http://build.oorexx.org/builds/interpreter-main/6209/windows/ There are 32-bit and 64-bit builds of 4.1.0 and 4.2.0, both debug and non-debug versions. -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Brandon Cherry wrote

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx RPM Naming

2010-09-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
kubuntu87.x86_64.deb ooRexx-4.2.0-6212.ubuntu87.x86_64.deb ooRexx-4.2.0-6212.kubuntu90.x86_64.deb ooRexx-4.2.0-6212.ubuntu91.x86_64.deb And have people asking us: I using Fedora 12 and there is no RPM for me. What should I do? When any one of the rpms listed above will work on Fedora 12. -- Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
and 64 bit build in the current build directory, and then post which directory it was. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployme

[Oorexx-devel] Enhanced Windows installation program

2010-09-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
weeks, but as always some second eyes are sure to pick up things I don't see. In particular I haven't yet tested much as a regular user on Vista or Windows 7. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Start uncovering the many ad

Re: [Oorexx-devel] z/Linux Access Found

2010-09-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
details on the problem I think David is referring to: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2991134&group_id=119701&atid=684730 4.0.1 rev. 5804, 5766 don't build with gcc 4.5-5.2 It is gcc 4.5-5.2 that is giving us problems. -- Mark Miesfeld -

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Timeline for V4.1

2010-09-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
if you do add them, I'll fix it up. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RPM Spec File Changes

2010-09-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Linxu OSes, a lot, I've installed rpm packages hundresds, probably thousands of time. I've never once used: rpm --prefix= -- Mark Miesfeld On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:59 AM, David Ashley wrote: >  All - > > I have been looking at making some changes to the RPM spec file and I am n

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Timeline for V4.1

2010-09-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
xtensions/rxsock/streamsocket.cls ./ > cp: ./extensions/rxsock/streamsocket.cls: A file or directory in the Those class files are not in 4.1.0. Same with cvsStream, that extension is not in 4.1.0. Maybe David didn't finish merging everything he meant to. -- Mark Miesfeld On Thu, Sep 16, 201

[Oorexx-devel] 4.1.0 stuff

2010-09-11 Thread Mark Miesfeld
k to branch the docs from trunk, and I could just replace the ooDialog files in the branch with the ones from 4.0.1. Whatever any one else thinks, I'm fine with. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Start uncovering the many advanta

[Oorexx-devel] My bug merge strategy for 4.1.0

2010-09-09 Thread Mark Miesfeld
#x27;pending' and in the 'Next Release' group. Those bugs have been merged to the 4.1.0 branch. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Ent

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [Oorexx-svn] SF.net SVN: oorexx:[6153] main/branches/4.1.0/trunk

2010-09-08 Thread Mark Miesfeld
27;t remember if it is the branch version I built this moring, or the trunk version, I also built this morning. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. En

[Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [Oorexx-svn] SF.net SVN: oorexx:[6153] main/branches/4.1.0/trunk

2010-09-08 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick and David, Thanks for getting this started. Can we also update the version numbers in trunk to be some number higher than 4.1.0? -- Mark Miesfeld -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:59 AM Subject: [Oorexx-svn] SF.net SVN: oorexx:[6153] main

Re: [Oorexx-devel] oodialog : question about initPropSheetHeader and caption

2010-09-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
ngs (like the Aero wizard) that are only available on Vista or later. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R)

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Missing commit e-mails

2010-09-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
e list. You have to be explicity added, I think by David. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Rexx On A Stick (was ooRexx as portable App)

2010-09-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
it up. > > As above, strange that one would need an additional privilege on an > admin ID. Again, it is because you are not really running as an admin, you are running as a regular user. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This

[Oorexx-devel] Missing commit e-mails

2010-09-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
y accident. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Rexx On A Stick (was ooRexx as portable App)

2010-09-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
not have 3.2.0 run from the memory stick if you already have another verison of ooRexx installed on the system. That will never work. -- Mark Miesfeld On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote: > Well, it wasn't so good for me :-(  I copied my old (2007) ooRexx 3.2 > from

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange Compile Error

2010-09-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
When I looked at the bug a couple of weeks ago, I had a hard time trying to put a specific version of gcc on the debian-based system I was on. Eventually I gave up. ;-( Maybe David with his better Linux skills can

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange Compile Error

2010-09-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
This looks to be exactly the bug already in tracker: 2991134 4.0.1 rev. 5804, 5766 don't build with gcc 4.5-5.2 On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:49 AM, David Ashley wrote: >  I set up a new virtual machine last night (Open SUSE 11.3 i386) and tried to > build ooRexx on it. The compile generates an erro

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Timeline for V4.1

2010-09-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
or one) new method you added to the DateTime class. If we included those and a couple of small enhancements from David, I think it would make a good release. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Timeline for V4.1

2010-09-01 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > That would work too, although I think if there are new APIs included, > then the version number should be 4.1.0, not 4.0.2. Oh, yeah. I'm not set on a version number. 4.1.0 would be fine. -- Mark Miesfeld > Rick > >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Timeline for V4.1

2010-09-01 Thread Mark Miesfeld
rlorn, hope that enough users would work with the beta ooDialog to give feedback on the new classes and new methods before they were set in stone. And find backwards compatibility issues, that could maybe be worked out. -- Mark Miesfeld --

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Timeline for V4.1

2010-09-01 Thread Mark Miesfeld
I can probably do most of the work myself, so it is not much of a burden for the other developers if they are too busy. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming s

Re: [Oorexx-devel] #ifdef __APPLE__ & __MACH

2010-09-01 Thread Mark Miesfeld
This is the only other place in the code that is similar, in SysFile.cpp: #if defined(__APPLE__) && defined(__MACH__) so you should have copied that. -- Mark Miesfeld On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:06 AM, CVBruce wrote: > I'll go check.  To tell you the truth, I just copied i

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange Windows SVN Bug

2010-08-31 Thread Mark Miesfeld
lease and debug builds in one file. You could name it anything and put it where ever you want. It should work fine. (Of course what you are currently doing *should* also work fine.) -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net Dev2D

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange Windows SVN Bug

2010-08-31 Thread Mark Miesfeld
t to me. And, I've tried introducing different errors to see if I could get the message you've gotten. No luck. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming s

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange Windows SVN Bug

2010-08-31 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:33 AM, David Ashley > wrote: >>  This is very strange. I can perform builds by hand, just not with my build >> script. It always chokes on the invocation of the makeorx.bat command. And &g

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange Windows SVN Bug

2010-08-30 Thread Mark Miesfeld
rex. I'll take a look at it. If you are redireting output from orxbuildwin.rex, it might be that the second redirection in makeorx.bat is not ... something. Not valid, no longer has a stdout handle ... -- Mark Miesfeld --

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange Windows SVN Bug

2010-08-30 Thread Mark Miesfeld
ing to write a batch file and have some error in the syntax. I think you are using Rexx scripts for most everything, so I suspect you have an error in something you are passing out to the OS. I would check where you are using the redirection &g

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Experimental : Start working on support for encoded strings (m17n).

2010-08-30 Thread Mark Miesfeld
it would be great if it was something that could interest Rick. I'd like to see it done with his guidance. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange Windows SVN Bug

2010-08-28 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 6:01 PM, David Ashley wrote: >  I am still Having problems checking out the ooRexx source code from the SVN > repository even after installing a new version of Slik Subversion. Does anyone > have any suggestions? Can you show us the last few lines of the check out so we c

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build.oorexx.org reachable ?

2010-08-25 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Just wondering, whether the build-machine is already up and reachable or > not yet ready (getting timeouts trying to use it from over here). It's not up. -- Ma

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx as portable App

2010-08-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
a USB stick was really what I had in mind, it was just simpler to do a quick demo with a zip file. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative c

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx as portable App

2010-08-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
ally halts it by some means, task manager, pskill, killer, etc..) On Windows, rxapi is best installed as a service. For Windows Vista (and I assume for Windows 7) there are a number of problems caused by UAC that can be avoided if rxapi is started as a service instead of as a regular process.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx as portable App

2010-08-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Walter Pachl wrote: > >> Sitting at my office computer w/o Admin rights I dearly miss ooRexx. >> Is it possible to use it as portable app without installing it? >> Would be

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx as portable App

2010-08-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
set your individual path, which is appended to the system path for everything you do. rxapi will start automatically when you run a Rexx program and will keep running until you log off. It will just run as a regular process rather than as a service. Which is jus

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problems creating a deb package on a German 32-bit Ubuntu ... (Re: Problems compiling 64-bit ooRexx for 64-bit Linux (Ubuntu) and installing it

2010-08-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
It looks like that machine doesn't have the debhelper package installed. sudo apt-get install debhelper Should do it, if not try a Google search for debhelper install -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Hi there, > > while creating a 32-

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Strange Windows SVN Bug

2010-08-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
me a bit to figure out the problem because the message is not that intuitive as to what the real problem is. Could it be that ethernet connection is not stable in the virtual machine? -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net email

[Oorexx-devel] oorexx.nsi and ooRexxProcess.dll

2010-08-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
m: ; This script requires 2 plugins added to your NISI installation. They need to ; be put into ${NSISDIR}\Plugins directory: ; services.dll -> http://nsis.sourceforge.net/File:Services.zip ; ooRexxProcess.dll -> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/ under oorexx-bui

Re: [Oorexx-devel] V4.1

2010-08-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
script. You can locate it by looking for the line starting with: %post The post script is kept up to date and the rpm install is undeniably the best tested of all the Unixes. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net email is sponso

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problems compiling 64-bit ooRexx for 64-bit Linux (Ubuntu) and installing it

2010-08-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
have trunk checked out, and want to be sure you have a good build, the first step(s) should be: # cd main # make maintainer-clean # svn update # ./bootstrap # ... I just redid the build using the steps directly above, worked fine, took less than 4 minutes. -- Mark Miesfeld ---

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread Mark Miesfeld
se branches will have oorexx.ver updated for sure. (Manually by David.) Often, when we first branch from trunk, the manual update in trunk isn't done right away, but David usually does the manual update pretty soon after we branch. A couple of weeks or a month.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Interesting Build Action

2010-08-20 Thread Mark Miesfeld
2 # For ooRexx, this number should ALWAYS be zero. This will force the linker to # utilize all previous releases for linking. ORX_AGE=0 -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't liv

[Oorexx-devel] New building / packaging details on Windows

2010-08-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
<- builds killer nMake /F Makefile.win ooRexxProcess_Plugin <- builds ooRexxProcess.dll ooRexxProcess.dll is not in the 'all' build because it requires NSIS to be installed. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Request for help on (Ubuntu) Linux (32- and 64-bit)

2010-08-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
build machine working well and you could easily pick up a pre-built deb package with all the latest fixes. I would try putting all the required files in the same diretory you are executing your script from, just to see what happens. Of course, you may have already tried these things. -- Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A question related to 64-bit ooRexx on Linux ...

2010-08-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Are you sure it works on 32 bit? -- Mark Miesfeld On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Hi there, > > while working on the 64-Bit-Ubuntu-Linux platform, I have been hit with the > following error from ooRexx: > > o...@ronylinux:/opt/BSF4ooRexx/inst

[Oorexx-devel] WSH bugs in tracker - new proposal

2010-08-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
state, and the resolution indicates that they are not just discarded. I'll do that tomorrow unless there are more objections. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live wi

[Oorexx-devel] SysFileTree > 4 GB files

2010-08-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
too poor. What were you comments here, or do I really not remember correctly? -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge

Re: [Oorexx-devel] bug fix in sandbox

2010-08-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Jean-Louis Faucher > wrote: > >> Some weeks ago, I fixed two crashes I had in my sandbox, and maybe those >> fixes are candidate to go in trunk... >> Let me know... >>

Re: [Oorexx-devel] bug fix in sandbox

2010-08-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. (I'll have to look it up, I forget right now.) Of course, I'll have to look it up anyway. I'm *pretty* sure I it doesn't have the bug. -- Mark Miesfeld > > > Jean Louis > > > ---

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >