[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Win7 VMs Back Online

All - I have the Win7 VMs on the Build Machine working again. They are now producing v5.0.0 development editions of ooRexx. Both the x86_32 and the x86_64 versions should be available at http://build.orexx.org/ David Ashley ---

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - I have converted about 30% of the VMs on the Build Machine to use the new CMake build system we have been working on. Unfortunately. we will not be able to convert much more than that because a lot of the older VMs do not have an up-to-date CMake version and can not build ooRexx successfully

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build machine suggestion

Ah, that works for me. Looks like we have an error in the main oorexx page, since it points to www.oorexx.org/builds Rick On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote: > I found an old bookmark that worked for me: > > http://build.oorexx.org/builds/ > > > > On 5/27/2014 7:20 AM, Rick

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build machine suggestion

I found an old bookmark that worked for me: http://build.oorexx.org/builds/ On 5/27/2014 7:20 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I'm still not able to get to the build server this morning. Rick On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Rick McGuire > wrote: Has the URL chang

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build machine suggestion

The oorexx and rexxla servers are hosted at different locations. Rick On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers < sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote: > I don't know if this is related, but there is a banner on the rexxla home > page saying > * This site currently running on a bac

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build machine suggestion

I don't know if this is related, but there is a banner on the rexxla home page saying * This site currently running on a backup image. Mailing lists and some site content will be out of date * although the ooRexx home page does not show it - possibly server maintenance somewhere? Jon On

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build machine suggestion

I'm still not able to get to the build server this morning. Rick On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > Has the URL changed? I'm not able to get to it at > http://www.oorexx.org/builds. > > Rick > > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:44 PM, David Ashley wrote: > >> It is up, but it h

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build machine suggestion

Has the URL changed? I'm not able to get to it at http://www.oorexx.org/builds. Rick On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:44 PM, David Ashley wrote: > It is up, but it has been having difficulties of late. Not all the VMs > are generating output. I think I have that fixed. > > David Ashley > > On Mon, 20

Re: [Oorexx-devel] build machine suggestion

It is up, but it has been having difficulties of late. Not all the VMs are generating output. I think I have that fixed. David Ashley On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 11:20 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Is the build machine down? I just wanted to check something out on > there and can't seem to find it? >

[Oorexx-devel] build machine suggestion

Is the build machine down? I just wanted to check something out on there and can't seem to find it? I've been exploring the question of getting the docs included in the cmake install process. Unfortunately, a successful build requires that the files in question exist, so they have to point at som

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

Excellent! .. and thank you! Mike > -Original Message- > The Build Machine has been upgraded to Fedora20-x86_64. In > addition, two new mirrored 2TB drives have been added thus > relieving the crunch for space for virtual machine images. We > now have more space than we will ever us

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - The Build Machine has been upgraded to Fedora20-x86_64. In addition, two new mirrored 2TB drives have been added thus relieving the crunch for space for virtual machine images. We now have more space than we will ever use (ha ha, I know, never say never). Total space on the server is a mirro

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

> First, all builds are still being pulled from the 4.2.0 branches. > Nothing has changed about that. > > I did add Fedora 20 i386 and x86_64 VMs. I built ooRexx with > them today and they are now automated. > > I also added a dedicate Fedora 20 VM for just building the > docs last night. The

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - First, all builds are still being pulled from the 4.2.0 branches. Nothing has changed about that. I did add Fedora 20 i386 and x86_64 VMs. I built ooRexx with them today and they are now automated. I also added a dedicate Fedora 20 VM for just building the docs last night. The docs were ac

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Status and ooRexx 4.2.0

David, That strategy makes sense to me. Thanks for clarifying exactly what is being produced. By the way, I've put the PDF docs on SourceForge. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:32 PM, David Ashley wrote: > All - > > Since we are into the 4.2.0 beta deeply now I am making the follow

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine Status and ooRexx 4.2.0

All - Since we are into the 4.2.0 beta deeply now I am making the following changes to the daily builds. ooRexx Interpreter builds - the input for these will be the 4.2.0 branch of the interpreter - the output will be placed in the release-candidates subdir on the Build Machine o

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Good News

All - I have good news concerning the Build Machine. In order to get the full significance of this a little history is necessary. Each platform VM requires a significant amount of overhead for set up and shut down. Because it is very hard to know how long an VM will take to be ready for an ssh co

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

Thanks David for this, and all the work you do to keep the build machine going. -- Mark Miesfeld On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, David Ashley wrote: > All - > > The ooRexx Build Machine is now fully functional again. > > David Ashley > > > > -

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - The ooRexx Build Machine is now fully functional again. David Ashley -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Web Server Down

All - The ooRexx Build Machine web server is down. After the upgrade to Fedora 18 the web server stopped functioning due to a build error with the Apache server. Somehow no MPM support was compiled into the server. I opened a bug report on this in the Fedora forums and hopefully they will supply

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - Fedora 18 has been added to the list of nightly builds. I will be upgrading the Build Machine to Fedora 18 on Sunday. There should only be a small outage window of about one hour during the afternoon. David Ashley --

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine Update

Today I added the Ubuntu 12.10 i386 and x86_64 build environments to the Build Machine. These will be used for daily builds of ooRexx. The Ubuntu 12.04 environments will remain active as well. build.oorexx.org David Ashley

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Outputs

All - In case you had not noticed the build machine is producing some new nightly builds. 1. The publican docs are now being produced nightly. 2. Open Suse 12.2 RPMs have been added. More new OS/architecture combinations are on the way. Let me know if you want a combination added. David Ashley

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

I have added a few more operating systems (VMs) to the Build Machine over the weekend. But I am having trouble with some of them. The Ubuntu and Linux Mint VMs do not seem to come up with the automated scripts. They build ooRexx okay but the script has a hard time bringing up the VM at all. I w

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

The docs are built first at about 02:00 CDT. The RPMs and DEBs are built afterwards in no particular order. David Ashley On 06/22/2012 10:40 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: David, Good news, thanks for all your hard work with the build machine. If possible could you enable the docs build towards the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

David, Good news, thanks for all your hard work with the build machine. If possible could you enable the docs build towards the top of the list. (Maybe you already have, I didn't look.) Thanks. -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:33 AM, David Ashley wrote: > I have upgraded the build m

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

I have upgraded the build machine to Fedora 17 and the Virtual Machine Manager now seems to be stable. I have enabled the nightly builds for a few RPM-based operating systems to see how things progress. I will enabled the deb-based operating systems over the next few days as I also have to upgr

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Web Status

All - The Build Machine Web Server is back up. I am still in the process of getting the automated builds re-enabled. The server should be a little faster for downloads. David Ashley -- Live Security Virtual Conference

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

Thanks for the update David. -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:46 AM, David Ashley wrote: > The Build Machine has a new IP address. Your DNS should be updated by now (I > made the change 24 hours ago). Everything is back to normal except the docs > build. I have an SSH problem with the

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

The Build Machine has a new IP address. Your DNS should be updated by now (I made the change 24 hours ago). Everything is back to normal except the docs build. I have an SSH problem with the VM that does the docs build that I can not seem to resolve. I will be doing docs builds by hand until I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:15 AM, David Ashley wrote: > As soon as I get these new VMs up I will take a look at the docs build on > Ubuntu. I have a suspicision it might not be feasible to build the docs on > Ubuntu, but I will have to wait and see. > Thanks David. For what it's worth, I had no t

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

As soon as I get these new VMs up I will take a look at the docs build on Ubuntu. I have a suspicision it might not be feasible to build the docs on Ubuntu, but I will have to wait and see. BTW - my intent is to keep adding VMs as new OS releases become available and remove older releases as n

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

Hi David, That sounds good. I hadn't really noticed that there were no new VMs being added. I just thought you had all you needed. This is sort of unrelated, but maybe related somewhat if you add a new VM. I had to rebuild one of my systems and I installed the latest Ubuntu on it. 10.10 I i

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

Some of you may have noticed that the Build Machine has been rather static lately i.e. no new VMs have been added of late. This is due to a problem I have with my DHCP server. I currently utilize my Netgear firewall/router as my DHCP server. When I add a new VM to the build machine I add its MA

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine - Windows builds

That is still the case. It is a very strange error. But when I run steps from individual batch files the error goes away. That is why I am changing strategies. At the same time I am also switching to building on Win 7 (32 and 64 bit) virtual machines. So far so good as far as I have gotten.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine - Windows builds

David, That sounds good. As I recall, when you first posted the problem with the Windows, you said that the build worked fine when you ran it manually. That you only got the error when you ran it automated. Is that still the case? -- Mark Miesfeld On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:33 AM, David Ashley

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine - Windows builds

All - I am in the process of changing the process by which the Build Machine creates ooRexx Windows builds. This may take a little time to create and debug but when finished the entire process will be driven as a set of Windows batch files instead of a single ooRexx script. There will still b

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Available Again

All - The build machine is available again. It turns out it was not a problem on the ATT side but a nework configuration issue on my machine (it now has multiple NIC cards and the routing table was messed up). But it is all fixed now. Builds (at least some of them) were being performed while

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine

All - The ooRexx build machine will be offline for a while this weekend for some maintenance. It should be back up by Sunday late in the day, probably much earlier. David Ashley -- This SF.net email is sponsored by

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Up

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:32 AM, David Ashley wrote: > The Build Machine is now up and running again. David, thanks for the work you put into this. About 20 minutes ago I went to the build machine to see if any docs had been buit, which they had. The set up looks good. -- Mark Miesfeld -

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Up

All - The Build Machine is now up and running again. It currently produces 4 builds: 1. ooRexx docs 2. Fedora 13 i686 rpm 3. Fedora 13 x86_64 rpm 4. Windows i386 installer In the future the following builds will be produced (no schedule yet for these): 1. Ubuntu i386 deb 2. SLES 11 s390x rpm

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

David, At SDI we gave up on the Windows schedule system before we ever got started with it. In lieu of it, we wrote a simple Rexx script that wakes up every 30 seconds and checks a data base of scheduled jobs to see if it has anything to do at the current date/time. In you situation, you woul

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Ashley wrote: > All - > > I am close to getting the new Build Machine up an running. There are > still a few problems to correct but I am close. > > 1. There was a bug in the crontab entry which prevented the fedora 13 > i386 build from ever running. That was

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - I am close to getting the new Build Machine up an running. There are still a few problems to correct but I am close. 1. There was a bug in the crontab entry which prevented the fedora 13 i386 build from ever running. That was corrected this morning so it should run tonight. 2. The Window

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Update

David, That all sounds good. Please add me to the notifications list. e-mail is easy to delete if I am too busy. -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Ashley wrote: > I am planning on a pruning script, but it is low on my priority list as > there is lots of space on the build

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Update

I am planning on a pruning script, but it is low on my priority list as there is lots of space on the build machine server. I will probably do that as the last item for the new environment. I have not added in failure/success notifications yet, but I should have that integrated over the weekend

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Update

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > Also, will there be some sort of failure notification when there is a > build failure on some platform?  It would be very useful to get quick > notification if there is some sort of platform-specific breakage. Yes, this would be useful. We

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Update

Since these are going to be performed nightly, many versions of the build will be maintained? There should be some sort of pruning schedule. Also, will there be some sort of failure notification when there is a build failure on some platform? It would be very useful to get quick notification if

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Update

All - As you may have noticed the Build Machine has been down (not producing builds) for a month now. This was due to a problem with the Linux KVM environment introduced by a Fedora 12 update. But I am pleased to let you know that I have upgraded the machine to Fedora 13 and am about to wind u

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - Per my usual Sunday thing (when I remember) I brought all my mone machines up to the current level of Fedora fixes. This usually goes without a hitch, but today it has caused a problem. The server running all the Build Machine VMs cannot seem to start any of the VMs after a reboot. Start

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine Status

Don't be surprised if the Build machine is offline for a while tonight. I need to replace the battery in a UPS. David Ashley -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status - Up

All - I finally have the Build Machine completely back up including the Windows build. Whew! I am going to be making some minor adjustments to the location of the builds but they should be obvious when I get them done. Thanks for all your patience. David Ashley ---

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - After struggling since the end of November with a network problem in the build VMs which prevented them from accessing the Internet, I have finally resolved that problem. Turns out it was a bug in the KVM networking code and not something I was doing (or not doing). So the problem has be

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - I have the Build Machine at least partially back up. There is only one kind of build available at the moment as I am really short on time these day. I will work as hard as I can to get others up as I can. David Ashley ooRexx Team --

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine Progress

All - Well, I am making progress, but I have run into another problem with the Windows VM. Internet access is not working but the shares to my local Samba server are working. This is preventing me from performing things like an SVN checkout or mailing emails. I may have to completely rebuild t

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine

It is REALLY unreachable at the moment since it is powered off. :-) I think I should have it back on line tomorrow. We shall see. David Ashley On 09/01/2009 12:33 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > I haven't tried in some time, but it looks unreachable from this coast also. > > Rick > > On Tue, Sep 1, 20

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine

I haven't tried in some time, but it looks unreachable from this coast also. Rick On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > I haven't been able to get to the build machine from here in San Diego > for weeks, maybe longer.  I basically just gave up on it. > > Is there anything that ca

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine

I haven't been able to get to the build machine from here in San Diego for weeks, maybe longer. I basically just gave up on it. Is there anything that can be done about this, or is it just a lost cause? I think David said it was on an AT&T network. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Back

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:01 AM, David Ashley wrote: > The Build Machine is now completely back up. All KVM builds have been > converted from Fedora 10 to 11. That's good David. We seem be having that old problem of not being able to connect to the build machine from everywhere. I can't reach i

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Back

All - The Build Machine is now completely back up. All KVM builds have been converted from Fedora 10 to 11. In doing this conversion I noted that ooRexx v3.2 i386 rpm does NOT work on Fedora 11 x86_64. There are missing libraries that prevent it from running. Also, it seems that pdftex is mis

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Partially Down

Although the build machine is up, the KVM server is currently down. I hope to have it back up by EOD. You will not be able to build the following: i386 RPM x86_64 RPM docs I will send out another note if it takes longer than I anticipate to get the KVM server back up. I am upgrading it to Fedor

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine : unknown error has occured

Just to let you know : I tried to build the documentation from the build machine, but I had this screen displayed immediately after I press the button "Create ooRexx documents" : << The build is either finished or an unknown error has occured. If the build is finished then the output of the build

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine

David, No, only from trunk. -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:39 PM, David Ruggles wrote: > Can I build from the 4.0beta branch on the build machine? > > Thanks, > > David Ruggles > CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+ > Network Engineer        Safe Data, Inc. > (910) 285-7200  da...@safedatausa.com

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine

Can I build from the 4.0beta branch on the build machine? Thanks, David Ruggles CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+ Network EngineerSafe Data, Inc. (910) 285-7200 da...@safedatausa.com -- This SF.net email is sponsored by:

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Network Status

Mark Miesfeld wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:34 PM, David Ashley wrote: Please try and connect to the build machine. http://build.oorexx.org/ Worked great. It connected right away, seemed really fast. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Network Status

yes, reachable from France. Jean-Louis David Ashley 11/04/2009 04:34 Please respond to Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List To ooRexxDevel cc Subject [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Network Status All - Please try and connect to the build machine. http://build.oorexx.org/ I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Network Status

Looking good from my direction too. Rick On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:34 PM, David Ashley wrote: > All - > > Please try and connect to the build machine. > > http://build.oorexx.org/ > > I think the network problems have been resolved but please let me know > one way or the other. > > Thanks, > Da

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Network Status

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:34 PM, David Ashley wrote: > Please try and connect to the build machine. > > http://build.oorexx.org/ Worked great. It connected right away, seemed really fast. -- Mark Miesfeld -- This SF.n

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine Network Status

All - Please try and connect to the build machine. http://build.oorexx.org/ I think the network problems have been resolved but please let me know one way or the other. Thanks, David Ashley -- This SF.net email is spo

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine is donw?

David Ashley wrote: > Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> >> David Ashley wrote: >>> All - >>> >>> Unfortunately, the problem you are seeing with access to the build >>> machine is not a problem I have direct control over. It turns out the >>> the build machine is up and runiing just fine, but the ATT

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine is donw?

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: David Ashley wrote: All - Unfortunately, the problem you are seeing with access to the build machine is not a problem I have direct control over. It turns out the the build machine is up and runiing just fine, but the ATT network is timing out when you try to access

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine is donw?

David Ashley wrote: > All - > > Unfortunately, the problem you are seeing with access to the build > machine is not a problem I have direct control over. It turns out the > the build machine is up and runiing just fine, but the ATT network is > timing out when you try to access it. I have opene

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - With the fix of the rxsock bug I have brought up a KVM Fedora 10 x86_64 guest and added that to the build machine build options. Work continues on porting the other VMware guests to Linux KVM. David Ashley -- Ope

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine is donw?

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:58 AM, David Ashley wrote: > Unfortunately, the problem you are seeing with access to the build > machine is not a problem I have direct control over. It turns out the > the build machine is up and runiing just fine, but the ATT network is > timing out when you try to acc

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine is donw?

All - Unfortunately, the problem you are seeing with access to the build machine is not a problem I have direct control over. It turns out the the build machine is up and runiing just fine, but the ATT network is timing out when you try to access it. I have opened up a bug report with ATT on t

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine is donw?

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote: > Not sure how quick David will be in getting this resolved as he is at > SHARE this week (luckily in Austin, his hometown). Okay, thanks for the update Gil. I usually build the docs myself, I just temporarily could not reach my system. Tha

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine is donw?

Mark, Not sure how quick David will be in getting this resolved as he is at SHARE this week (luckily in Austin, his hometown). Mark Miesfeld wrote: > Hi David, > > It seems the build machine is down. I was just trying to build the > docs on it and couldn't get to it. > > -- > Mark Miesfeld >

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine is donw?

Hi David, It seems the build machine is down. I was just trying to build the docs on it and couldn't get to it. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tack

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - The Build Machine is back up. Sometime later there will be a small downtime that no one will probably notice (less than 10 minutes). That will probably happen sometime Monday or Tuesday. of next week when I replace the PS/2 keyboard and mouse with USB replacements. David Ashley

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Status

All - My new hardware has arrived. It includes a new monitor so I will need to shut down the Build Machine for a while to install it and reconfigure the graphics driver for all of my systems. I also am switching over from a PS/2 based KVM to a USB based KVM. This will also mean a little downtim

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine Back Up

All - The build machine is back up. The VMware process was hung up badly and eventually hung up the whole machine. It took about an hour to get it back up due to the forced check disk that happened in the VMs on reboot. But everything is back to normal now. David Ashley -

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Cleanup

David, Yeah definitely do that. I don't see any point to saving the older builds. --- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:45 AM, David Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All - > > Any objections to me cleaning up the build on the Buils Machine that are > older than one month old? I just wa

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine Cleanup

All - Any objections to me cleaning up the build on the Buils Machine that are older than one month old? I just want to reduce the size of the HTTP web listings. David Ashley -- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, Mar

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Upgrade Status

want the library. Do run Windows update first. -Original Message- From: Mark Miesfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 16:59 To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Upgrade Status On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:27 AM

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build machine Upgrade Status

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:27 AM, David Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought I would put together a status report since I have now been > trying to get the new test build machine set up over the last 3 days. > The results are very mixed. That's too bad, it sounds like one of those frustrat

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine Upgrade Status

All - I thought I would put together a status report since I have now been trying to get the new test build machine set up over the last 3 days. The results are very mixed. First, VMware Server 2 will not work under Fedora 9, period. You can install the rpm but you can not configure the instal

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine and VMware Server 2

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:35 PM, David Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > VMware Server 2 became available this weekend. I am going to spend this > week trying to set up a test server to try out the new version ... > > Wish me luck. Good Luck. -- Mark Miesfeld --

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine and VMware Server 2

All - VMware Server 2 became available this weekend. I am going to spend this week trying to set up a test server to try out the new version (the production build machine will remain available during this period). My hope is the the VIX API works better in this version for us than it did in th

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine back Up

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 2:32 PM, David Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Build Machine is back up. It has the new look-and-feel of the main > website. All the scripts have been tested so feel free to use it. Great work David. The rpm build seems to work well also. I just did a fresh check

[Oorexx-devel] Build Machine back Up

All - The Build Machine is back up. It has the new look-and-feel of the main website. All the scripts have been tested so feel free to use it. Thanks, W. David Ashley IBM Systems and Technology Group Lab Services Open Object Rexx Team Mobile Phone: 512-289-7506---

[Oorexx-devel] Build machine doesn't build Windows interpreter

Hi David, The build machine no longer builds the Windows version of the interpreter. I have another post where I'm going to talk about compiler versions. The two threads are probably related. But, when I ask for a Windows build, I don't even get the log output. If the build fails, there still