[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

2015-10-01 Thread Donald Butterworth
Hi Everyone, As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we discovered that we can't add the 016 and the 029 control number fields to a MARC record. It looks like it saves, but it isn't there when you do a new search. It also never shows on the MARC View screen. What

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

2015-10-01 Thread Hardy, Elaine
.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Donald Butterworth Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Hi Everyone, As part of a project to

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

2015-10-01 Thread Mary Llewellyn
] On Behalf Of Dea Nowell Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:58 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the system? If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record. We

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

2015-10-01 Thread Dea Nowell
r 01, 2015 12:58 PM *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Elaine, is your system stripping the 029 on import of records into the system? If so this is why it will not save the 029 in a record. We just discovered this with our system (Sage Library System)

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

2015-10-01 Thread Dea Nowell
ls-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Donald Butterworth *Sent:* Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:48 AM *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Hi Everyone, As part of a project to add more fields to the general keyword index, we discovered that we can't add

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

2015-10-01 Thread Donald Butterworth
.7128 > 404.235.7201, fax > eha...@georgialibraries.org > www.georgialibraries.org > www.georgialibraries.org/pines > > > > *From:* Open-ils-general [mailto: > open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Dea > Nowell > *Sent:* Thursday, Octob

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

2015-10-01 Thread Hardy, Elaine
boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dea Nowell Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 1:57 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 Mary, we also strip the 029s as we don't see any reason to keep them. I'm just noting that stripping them on import may be why Elaine (&

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

2015-10-01 Thread Donald Butterworth
128 404.235.7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org > www.georgialibraries.org www.georgialibraries.org/pines > > > > *From:* Open-ils-general [ > mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org > <open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org>] *On Behalf O

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029

2015-10-01 Thread Hardy, Elaine
2:10 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 016 & 029 The only reason I wanted them included in our parameters is so that when we complete this project, we can submit it to become part of the permanent Evergreen code, if the power that be so choose. These control