Douglas E. Engert wrote:
It could also mean that the stack was being overlayed, and moving this
variabe to static means something else on the stack is being overlayed.
Two other things to try:
Compile without optimizatrion.
Use the debugger s to set a watch point on the ans_label before calling
Matthew Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> We are presently moving a lot of our infrastructure servers into
> Vmware ESX virtual machines. At the moment we are testing OpenAFS
> fileservers and DB as virtual machines (sans backend). Is anyone else
> tried this in production yet?
I have h
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 19:31, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> You may remember that our cell (rpi.edu) was having some problems
> with the fileservers hanging. The new version of OpenAFS has been
> installed on some of our servers, but I am not sure if it has been
> installed on all of them.
All files
It only obliterates it if you have ONE vmware system.
We are doing this for our afs database servers and have 10 DELL 2650's
virtualizing approximately 100 linux and windows servers, with plenty of
room to spare.
-- Nathan
Nathan Neul
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Andrew Bacchi wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 19:31, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
You may remember that our cell (rpi.edu) was having some problems
with the fileservers hanging. The new version of OpenAFS has been
installed on some of our servers, but I am not sure if it has been
ins
I run Scout in a window to keep an eye on my fileservers. Under the
'Conn' column I occasionally see a star next to the number of
connections to the server. I don't see any documentation on this. Does
anyone know the meaning of the star (asterisk)? Thanks.
--
Facade: Provide a unified interfa
Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
It only obliterates it if you have ONE vmware system.
We are doing this for our afs database servers and have 10 DELL 2650's
virtualizing approximately 100 linux and windows servers, with plenty of
room to spare.
-- Nathan
Are you using vmotion. ESX (if the vm images are
No, we'll possibly look at it down the road, but couldn't afford the
infrastructure required to support vmotion. (Have to have hugely
expensive SAN hardware underneath.) When ESX adds support for iSCSI
devices, we'll likely look more into vMotion.
We're also not using it for fileservers, just db
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
> > However I'm still getting the following error:
> > Open AFS (R) openafs 1.2.13 fsck
> > ** /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s3
> > BAD SUPER BLOCK: VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN FIRST
> > ALTERNATE
> > USE AN ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK TO SUPPLY
>From the scout code:
/*
* mini_justify
*
* Description:
* Place the chars in the source buffer into the target buffer
* with the desired justification, either centered, left-justified
* or right-justified. Also
Stephen Joyce wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
However I'm still getting the following error:
Open AFS (R) openafs 1.2.13 fsck
** /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s3
BAD SUPER BLOCK: VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN FIRST ALTERNATE
USE AN ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK TO SUPPLY NEE
OK. I'm a newbie to AFS config. I've tried
to install my first server. When I try the
"vos create", it fails.
Could not fetch the list of partitions from the server
Possible communication failure
Possible communication failure
I was receiving that error:
rxi_GetUDPSocket: bind failed"
afte
Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
No, we'll possibly look at it down the road, but couldn't afford the
infrastructure required to support vmotion. (Have to have hugely
expensive SAN hardware underneath.) When ESX adds support for iSCSI
devices, we'll likely look more into vMotion.
We are due to replace som
i think logging ufs reused some inode fields we need, so logging ufs
support is unlikely
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Same document.. Please check the last example of "backup volrestore" command in Reference guide.
Can Anybody suggests how to do restore from multiple differential dumps from backup disk file
Regds
-raghuHans-Gunther Borrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 00:57,
15 matches
Mail list logo
