Re: [OpenAFS] AFS evaluation - Leopard client

2010-05-14 Thread Derrick Brashear
1.5.74 will solve the panic for Leopard, but 1.5.74.1 has some improvements. I suppose I could build it for you for Leopard when I get home Derrick On May 14, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Rick Cochran wrote: Derrick, Thanks for your quick response. Nice to be back in touch after my long AFS ab

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS evaluation

2010-05-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 5/14/2010 5:20 PM, Rick Cochran wrote: > I was a very happy AFS admin until changing jobs about 13 years ago. > Now, I have been asked to evaluate AFS as a possible solution to our > need for central filesystem functionality at Cornell. Here are my > experiences so far. Comments and suggestio

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS evaluation

2010-05-14 Thread Rick Cochran
No. I think we experienced a case of "broken for other, temporary, non-obvious reasons". On 05/14/2010 06:30 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote: is /usr/vice symlinked to /usr/afs or vice-versa perhaps? On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Rick Cochran wrote: Addressing this issue separately: Derrick a

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS evaluation - Leopard client

2010-05-14 Thread Rick Cochran
Derrick, Thanks for your quick response. Nice to be back in touch after my long AFS absence. On 05/14/2010 05:30 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Rick Cochran wrote: ... MacOS client (both 1.4.12 and 1.5.73) * There is no uninstaller. there's one in the dmg

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS evaluation

2010-05-14 Thread Derrick Brashear
is /usr/vice symlinked to /usr/afs or vice-versa perhaps? On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Rick Cochran wrote: > Addressing this issue separately: > > Derrick and Andrew are undoubtedly correct - /usr/vice/etc/krb.conf is not > used. > > /usr/afs/etc/krb.conf works as described in the URL below.

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS evaluation

2010-05-14 Thread Rick Cochran
Addressing this issue separately: Derrick and Andrew are undoubtedly correct - /usr/vice/etc/krb.conf is not used. /usr/afs/etc/krb.conf works as described in the URL below. It was necessary for us since our cell name does not correspond to our Kerberos realm. Oddly, we could not get auth

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS evaluation

2010-05-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Rick Cochran writes: > Should mention /usr/vice/etc/krb.conf: > http://docs.openafs.org/Reference/5/krb.conf.html I've not heard of /usr/vice/etc/krb.conf. What's it for? What does it do? -- Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu) _

[OpenAFS] Re: AFS evaluation

2010-05-14 Thread Andrew Deason
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:20:09 -0400 Rick Cochran wrote: > Should mention /usr/vice/etc/krb.conf: > http://docs.openafs.org/Reference/5/krb.conf.html I can't find that file being referenced at all in the modern codebase. Only the servers need krb.conf; all the clients need is the appropriate domai

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS evaluation

2010-05-14 Thread Derrick Brashear
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Rick Cochran wrote: > I was a very happy AFS admin until changing jobs about 13 years ago.  Now, I > have been asked to evaluate AFS as a possible solution to our need for > central filesystem functionality at Cornell.  Here are my experiences so > far.  Comments a

[OpenAFS] AFS evaluation

2010-05-14 Thread Rick Cochran
I was a very happy AFS admin until changing jobs about 13 years ago. Now, I have been asked to evaluate AFS as a possible solution to our need for central filesystem functionality at Cornell. Here are my experiences so far. Comments and suggestions are welcome. -Rick Documentation issues

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS hangs, possible nat issues?

2010-05-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 5/14/2010 3:11 PM, Steve Simmons wrote: > > At this point I'm guessing that the nat box is dropping the mapping between > internal and external UDP ports. The 1.5.73 release notes mention this issue, > saying they add UDP keepalive for just that reason. That is indeed the problem. > Next st

[OpenAFS] AFS hangs, possible nat issues?

2010-05-14 Thread Steve Simmons
We've got a user here who's behind a firewall/nat and having some problems. The firewall is likely an aggressive, as it protects a hospital. He's running the stock Ubuntu 9.10 client, which he reports as being oafs version 1.4.11. The symptom is that he gets periodic hangs when accessing files i