My understanding of the Kerberos changes is Lion is:
o Weak encryption types are now dis-allowed.
o TCP protocol is used when large TGTs (eg. from Active Directory KDCs) are
involved.
Although potentially disruptive, these seem logical to me.
Do you know of any others?
-Rick
On 08/22/201
I have just heard that KfW is not being actively maintained. Is this true?
If so, what implications does it have for OpenAFS?
-Rick
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
In RHEL5:
arctura> which asetkey
/usr/sbin/asetkey
arctura> rpm -q -f `which asetkey`
openafs-krb5-1.4.12-el5.1.1
On 09/28/2010 03:05 PM, Phillip Moore wrote:
For the first time in over 10 years, I'm finally getting around to playing with
OpenAFS again. �I'm trying to setup a test cell on a Ce
On 09/20/2010 06:05 PM, Harald Barth wrote:
I am fairly certain that the Ubuntu client is mangling the data.
If you can exchange data amongst all the others without mangling that would
point to that.
On which kind of file system is /var/cache/openafs ? (ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs,
...)
ext3
On 09/20/2010 05:10 PM, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
On 20 Sep 2010, at 20:34, Rick Cochran wrote:
On 09/20/2010 01:45 PM, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
On 20 Sep 2010, at 18:20, Rick Cochran wrote:
I copy a file from a Ubuntu 10 machine with openafs-client 1.4.12+dfsg-3
and read it from a
on or turning it off completely (even temporarily) to verify this is
not your problem.
antoine
On 2010-09-20, at 1:45 PM, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
On 20 Sep 2010, at 18:20, Rick Cochran wrote:
I copy a file from a Ubuntu 10 machine with openafs-client 1.4.12+dfsg-3 and
read it from a Scien
On 09/20/2010 01:45 PM, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
On 20 Sep 2010, at 18:20, Rick Cochran wrote:
I copy a file from a Ubuntu 10 machine with openafs-client 1.4.12+dfsg-3
and read it from a Scientific Linux 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 machine with
openafs-client-1.4.12-el5.1.1. The checksum is wrong on
I copy a file from a Ubuntu 10 machine with openafs-client 1.4.12+dfsg-3 and
read it from a Scientific Linux 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 machine with
openafs-client-1.4.12-el5.1.1. The checksum is wrong on the reading end, and it
changes to a different wrong checksum every time I re-do the copy.
samue
Somebody here suggested disabling SMB 2. That sounds like a good idea to me
since I think the introduction of SMB 2 corresponds to when the OpenAFS problem
started. But I'm not in a position to try this myself at the moment.
http://www.thorschrock.com/2009/09/19/disable-smb-v2-service-windows
te:
Does "fs exa /afs/.afsdemo.cit.cornell.edu/users/rcc2/Yesterday" return
data? If so, you need to release the volume containing
/afs/.afsdemo.cit.cornell.edu data.
You might want to try "fs lsm " to find out what exactly those
mount points are pointing to if you suspect
I'm having trouble understanding the following.
-Rick
arctura> vos remove -id rcc2.backup
Volume 536870926 on partition /vicepb server avoca01.serverfarm.cornell.edu
deleted
arctura> fs rmm /afs/afsdemo.cit.cornell.edu/users/jim1/Yesterday
arctura> vos backup rcc2
Created backup volume for rcc2
at the realm for afsdemo.cit.cornell.edu is
CIT.CORNELL.EDU?
No. And it now works without doing this. It's set to "Automatic".
What is the output of the NIM logging? Turn it on from the
Options->General page.
Not necessary now, but wonderful for future use.
Thanks,
-Rick
Trying to play by the book, but having no joy.
Windows XP 32-bit
Starting from scratch, I install:
kfw-i386-3-2-2.msi
netidmgr-i386-rel-2_0_0_304.msi
openafs-en_US-1-5-7400.msi
and put the following in C:\Windows\krb5.ini
--
[libdefaults]
default_realm = CIT.
to the data. It can be somewhere in an afs
cell.
Jeffrey Altman
On 5/17/2010 4:10 PM, Rick Cochran wrote:
>>>
>>> * Windows 7 client (1.5.74) has authentication issues
>>
>> Please clarify what your authentication issue is. Since your realm and
>> cel
On 05/15/2010 09:37 AM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
� * If the installation requires a restart (which it says it does),
it doesn't require one. recent installers should also not say it does.
Missed that. �But which versions should I be using - the maintenance
releases which say "RECOMMENDED",
Thanks for the quick and thorough response. I am thrashing due to end/beginning
of semester issues with other services, hence slow reply (below).
On 05/14/2010 06:56 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
On 5/14/2010 5:20 PM, Rick Cochran wrote:
I was a very happy AFS admin until changing jobs about 13
No. I think we experienced a case of "broken for other, temporary,
non-obvious reasons".
On 05/14/2010 06:30 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
is /usr/vice symlinked to /usr/afs or vice-versa perhaps?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Rick Cochran wrote:
Addressing this issue separately
Derrick,
Thanks for your quick response. Nice to be back in touch after my long
AFS absence.
On 05/14/2010 05:30 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Rick Cochran wrote:
...
MacOS client (both 1.4.12 and 1.5.73)
* There is no uninstaller.
there's one i
authentication to work properly until we added
the /usr/vice/etc/krb.conf file. I think this comes under the category
of "I scratched my nose and it broke, so I wiggled my ears and it
started working."
-Rick
On 05/14/2010 05:44 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Rick Cochran writes:
Should me
I was a very happy AFS admin until changing jobs about 13 years ago. Now, I
have been asked to evaluate AFS as a possible solution to our need for central
filesystem functionality at Cornell. Here are my experiences so far. Comments
and suggestions are welcome.
-Rick
Documentation issues
20 matches
Mail list logo
