Re: [OpenAFS] rxkad error=19270410 on AIX 5.3, openafs 1.4.2

2006-12-03 Thread Steve Roseman
Marcus Watts wrote: I've built a cache manager with WORDS_BIGENDIAN defined. Works fine. There's some really screwey logic in src/config/afsconfig.h that is supposed to set WORDS_BIGENDIAN . For aix 4.3, this starts simply enough: #define AUTOCONF_FOUND_BIGENDIAN 1 #define ENDI

Re: [OpenAFS] rxkad error=19270410 on AIX 5.3, openafs 1.4.2

2006-12-02 Thread Steve Roseman
Marcus Watts wrote: It would be helpful (to me at least) if Steve Roseman could verify that "pts" and other tools work. That would be useful confirmation that it's the same problem I see. -Marcus pts seems to nominally work. I klog as ad

Re: [OpenAFS] rxkad error=19270410 on AIX 5.3, openafs 1.4.2

2006-12-02 Thread Steve Roseman
Jeffrey Altman wrote: Steve Roseman wrote: Derrick J Brashear wrote: On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Steve Roseman wrote: I can get a token, but it errors when trying to access AFS filespace: $ klog Password: $ tokens Try the patch I committed yesterday to src/rxkad/private_data.h I assume the one

Re: [OpenAFS] rxkad error=19270410 on AIX 5.3, openafs 1.4.2

2006-12-02 Thread Steve Roseman
Derrick J Brashear wrote: On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Steve Roseman wrote: I can get a token, but it errors when trying to access AFS filespace: $ klog Password: $ tokens Try the patch I committed yesterday to src/rxkad/private_data.h I assume the one with: ! afs_int32 ticketLen

[OpenAFS] rxkad error=19270410 on AIX 5.3, openafs 1.4.2

2006-12-01 Thread Steve Roseman
I can get a token, but it errors when trying to access AFS filespace: $ klog Password: $ tokens Tokens held by the Cache Manager: User's (AFS ID 258) tokens for [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Expires Dec 5 17:54] --End of list-- $ cd /afs/cc/home/lusgr $ pwd afs: Tokens for user of AFS id 258 for cell

Re: [OpenAFS] DB servers: simultaneous use of 2 OpenAFS versions

2006-08-07 Thread Steve Roseman
Frederic Gilbert wrote: Hi, We have 3 DB servers to upgrade, hardware + OS + OpenAFS (1.2.13 to 1.4.1). These upgrades imply moving the data volumes out of the old server, doing hardware and software install, and moving the data back into the new server. I estimate that upgrading one server co

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS related problem with firefox

2006-05-25 Thread Steve Roseman
Juha Jäykkä wrote: No, actually, it's "if you want to run old servers, have fun" Ok. I am now moving to 1.4.1 clients, but the servers need a little more care. Is the procedure as simple as one would wish: 1) shut down *one* server (file or db) 2) install new version on it 3) restart 4) repea

[OpenAFS] 1.2.11 upgrade.

2006-03-13 Thread Steve Roseman
Forgive the paranoia, but, I have 2 quick questions, requiring Yes or No answers. (3 servers, Linux 2.4.22, Fedora Core 1) 1) Can I go from 1.2.11 File and DB servers to 1.4.0 by replacing the /usr/afs binaries and restarting? 2) Can I do one system at a time (one a day)? Thanks, Steve ---

Re: [OpenAFS] New FC4 Kernel == Can't Find System Call Table

2006-03-05 Thread Steve Roseman
Derrick J Brashear wrote: On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Steve Roseman wrote: Jason McCormick wrote: After installing the new Fedora 4 kernel (2.6.14-1.1644_FC4), when you insert the AFS module is now reports that it cannot find the syscall table. System call hooks will not be installed; proceeding

Re: [OpenAFS] New FC4 Kernel == Can't Find System Call Table

2006-03-05 Thread Steve Roseman
Jason McCormick wrote: After installing the new Fedora 4 kernel (2.6.14-1.1644_FC4), when you insert the AFS module is now reports that it cannot find the syscall table. System call hooks will not be installed; proceeding anyway Starting AFS cache scan...found 1396 non-empty cache files (13%).

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: 1.4.0 rc7 under AIX 5.3

2005-10-18 Thread Steve Roseman
Joe Buehler wrote: Hans-Gunther Borrmann wrote: the client itself works very well. No problem to compile and run. The AIX loadable authentication module afs_dynamic_auth is not usable. If a user logs in and is authenticated by this module all commands he submits segfault. I believe I subm

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.3.81 under AIX 5.1

2005-04-15 Thread Steve Roseman
Derrick J Brashear wrote: On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Hans-Gunther Borrmann wrote: "make dest" terminates with an error message: "terminates". The error is: make: 1254-005 Ignored error code 1 from last command. ignored. afs_dynamic_auth and afs_dynamic_kerbauth are completely missing. The 1.3.80 versi

[OpenAFS] 1.3.78 under AIX 5.1: unusable

2005-02-07 Thread Steve Roseman
More data points: AIX 5.1 ML7 and 1.3.78. CC=cc ./configure --enable-transarc-paths --disable-pam --host=rs6000 --with-afs-sysname=rs_aix51 (compiling on a fast chrp machine, testing on an old MCA system, thus the --host and --with-afs-sysname) I can start AFS, cd to system:anyuser directories,

Re: [OpenAFS] Swapping AFS DB servers on the same IP names/numbers

2005-01-14 Thread Steve Roseman
Bill Hays wrote: We have three older afs db servers running on suns and are migrating to three new servers running redhat linux. What we'd like to know is whether we can take down the old servers, and renumber and rename the new servers to match the three old servers so that we do not have to touch

Re: [OpenAFS] Pro's & Con's of /usr/local on AFS....

2004-10-27 Thread Steve Roseman
Todd M. Lewis wrote: Jim Rees wrote: '/afs/isis' is a symbolic link, leading to a mount point for volume 'root.cell'. So you broke one of the most important features of afs, the global name space. Why? 'Cause we're stupid? 'Cause I didn't want to make an already too long message even long

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: 1.3.70 comments?

2004-08-19 Thread Steve Roseman
Derrick J Brashear wrote: looking at what mutexes can be in play here, i'm going to have to bet on peer->peer_lock. the rest are init'd in rx_InitHost (rx_Init), which seeing as we have a kernel rx listener, well, it must have run. likewise, only shutdown_rx kills said mutexes. Ok, this obvious

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: 1.3.70 comments?

2004-08-19 Thread Steve Roseman
Horst Birthelmer wrote: I don't know about AIX 4.x but that code works on AIX 5.2. No reason why the lock wouldn't be initialized (well, at first glance)... I assume something weird happened to the peer but I'm still looking. Horst Note that I'm running AIX 5.1. (I have no test systems capable of

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: 1.3.70 comments?

2004-08-18 Thread Steve Roseman
Derrick J Brashear wrote: The real problem is that I'm 100% unfamiliar with kernel debugging tools on AIX. But, I'll make a guess. If this patch finds it, I'll be surprised. If it doesn't, I'll guess there's an uninitialized mutex, but I'd have to look harder to see if that's detectable. I can