he other latex files automatically.
8. Mac Tiger will also have to be supported in the future..
tedc
-Original Message-
From: Michael Norwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 10:49 AM
To: ted creedon
Cc: OpenAFS-Info
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Web page...
ted creed
ted creedon wrote:
All good questions, with no immediate answers.
(If this cutting bugs someone plz. let me know.)
One more thing came to mind. How to deal with chapters
for the various *nix platforms and architectures and Windows
based systems. i.e. the IBM/Transarc docs got me through
The developers shouldn't be expected to, they're busy doing what they do
best.
tedc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of chas williams - CONTRACTOR
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 8:26 AM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAF
All good questions, with no immediate answers.
>tgc:The book "Managing AFS" by Campbell is out of print and should really
be replaced by an "OpenAFS, Operation and Maintenance Manual".
Perhaps there are some other suggestions?
>tgc:I'd rather see raw content produced over form. It won't be by t
ted creedon wrote:
What are you offering?
The Latex docs need updating and proofing.
Docbook format needs to be investigated but it looks like the vast array of
fonts used by IBM may be challenging.
Other.
tedc
So, I take it this a matter of text conversion? How do the docs get
che
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"ted creedon" wri
tes:
>Finally, and no flaming responses please, at the old Tektronix you had to
>have a BS in English to be employed in the manuals department. They realized
>it took a different talent set to write manuals than to design products.
i doubt that any
Bil,
If you want editing and proofing, I'm willing to try to fit some of that
kind of work in (I've offered before). I don't know about updating--it's not
like I know that much about afs, especially server side--but I've got
experience editing.
Sorry to ask a stupid question, is there a single
--On Saturday, July 16, 2005 12:01 PM -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 1
From: "ted creedon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: RE: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Web page...
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:54:49 -0700
What are you offering?
The Latex docs need updating and proofing.
Norwick
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:02 PM
To: Derrick J Brashear
Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Web page...
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, ted creedon wrote:
>
>> I think all of you missed Rodney's point.
>
>
> Still ok t
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, ted creedon wrote:
I think all of you missed Rodney's point.
Still ok to be wrong in this country, which is fortunate for you I
guess;-)
He makes his living supporting AFS
and the management only looks at the cover, not what's inside.
I'
On Friday, July 15, 2005 07:24:35 AM -0400 Jeffrey Altman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* If there are obvious bugs to report in the software, documentation,
or web site. File a report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it can
get fixed.
For the record, problems with the web site can be reported t
All right; we'll call it a draw.
Rodney
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, ted creedon wrote:
I think all of you missed Rodney's point.
Still ok to be wrong in this country, which is fortunate for you I
guess;-)
He makes his living supporting AFS
and the management only looks at the cover, not what's inside.
I'd suggest setting up an inter
ok a different talent set to write manuals than to design products.
tedc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Derrick J Brashear
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 4:45 AM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Web page...
On Fr
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Rodney M Dyer wrote:
At 01:11 AM 7/15/2005, you wrote:
I see no "1.3.8400" string. I do see a
"1.3.84".
You're just as bad as Derrick correcting my
grammer. :)
grammar. And spelling. I misspelled 85 as 84. Sorry :)
I made a mistake in a single email. I'm not the
o
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
As for my opinion on the content of this thread:
* I understand Rodney's point about wanting a web site that he can point
administrators to that is as professional as a company with a billion
dollars in revenue. However, he must remember that we ar
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> Hm; I thought you could usually turn that off.
> Anyway, I suspected that might be the problem, but then why the .tar.tar ?
Because on Windows, it is the file extension that is important to
distinguish the type of the file. So the browser is looking at the
mime type,
On Friday, July 15, 2005 02:25:13 AM -0400 Marcus Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Various wrote:
...
> And, why is it that when I right-click to download the source
> distribution "openafs-1.3.85-src.tar.bz2" the dialog saves the file as
> "openafs-1.3.85-src.tar.tar" ???
I don't know.
On Friday, July 15, 2005 01:45:59 AM -0400 Rodney M Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
My job is kind of stressful because I'm working against the tsunami of
Novell on our campus. Trying to prove that AFS is worth its mettle isn't
easy when the web site contains problems. The upper management
Various wrote:
...
> > And, why is it that when I right-click to download the source
> > distribution "openafs-1.3.85-src.tar.bz2" the dialog saves the file as
> > "openafs-1.3.85-src.tar.tar" ???
>
> I don't know. Perhaps your browser is trying to "protect" you by making
> sure a file whose co
At 01:11 AM 7/15/2005, you wrote:
I see no "1.3.8400" string. I do see a "1.3.84".
You're just as bad as Derrick correcting my grammer. :)
I made a mistake in a single email. I'm not the one with the public website.
My job is kind of stressful because I'm working against the tsunami of
No
On Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:28:24 AM -0400 Rodney M Dyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It appears that OpenAFS 1.3.8500 is out now. I think the "1.3.8400"
string in the release flash needs to be fixed...
11-Jul-2005 - OpenAFS 1.3.85 Released!
OpenAFS 1.3.84 represents the new st
22 matches
Mail list logo
