CKM progress and RE: Archetype versioning on CKM

2011-07-12 Thread Thomas Beale
; > If you are keen to infer from these numbers whether it has never been > published, why not use v1.0.1 up to v1.0.n for any not yet published > revision. On publishing, it then could be v1.1.0 or v1.1.1 (or so). It > is not quite as clear (but as I said I don't think it makes any > difference), but at least it is not requiring us to make incompatible > changes under the old archetype id for all versions after v0. Or the > prepublication revisions are even called draft: v1.draft.1 up to > v1.draft.n and v.1.0.0 or v.1.1.0 (e.g.) on first publishing. I think this is the danger of how we use the word 'publishing'... Are we getting closer to a solution? - thomas -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110712/366a0bfb/attachment.html>

CKM progress and RE: Archetype versioning on CKM

2011-07-12 Thread Diego Boscá
I like the idea of a warning on the use (or misuse, purpose...) part of the archetype. I also believe that anything thas has been made public needs to have a unique identifier 2011/7/12 Sebastian Garde : > > > Am 11.07.2011 17:43, schrieb Thomas Beale: > > On 21/06/2011 10:04, Heather Leslie wrote

CCR model

2011-07-12 Thread Heath Frankel
Hi Koray, In 2009 I did an IHE Medical Summary profile based Template for the Interoperability Demonstration at HIC. I can't recall the exact relationships between CCR, CCD and IHE Medical Summary profiles but they pretty much cover the same concepts. The template was only a subset of the Referra

CKM progress and RE: Archetype versioning on CKM

2011-07-12 Thread Sebastian Garde
27;t think it makes any difference), but at least it is not requiring us to make incompatible changes under the old archetype id for all versions after v0. Or the prepublication revisions are even called draft: v1.draft.1 up to v1.draft.n and v.1.0.0 or v.1.1.0 (e.g.) on first publishing. In summary: Do anything, but please do not change the archetype id just before publication. Sebastian -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110712/e56ef94a/attachment.html>

CCR model

2011-07-12 Thread Koray Atalag
Wow - I'm extremely interested... It'd be great to have a look at the artefacts. Happy to share with the community after I put them into a good shape. This we intend to use as the starting point for our national minimum core summary record in New Zealand. Cheers, -koray -Original Message-