Hi,
There is another issue with digital signatures in the context of EHRs:
Their value decreases over time and with them the value of digitally
signed documents as legal evidence.
In other words: securely signed documents don't necessarily provide a
secure basis for verifying authenticity for
There are undeniably enormous challenges in this area.
However, right now, we have a health system that operates off bits of
paper augmented with IT here and there. Can we verify the authenticity
of a medical record from the 1970s today? Will a paper health record
created today be
If I might ask a rather mundane technical question about archetypes ...
Looking at the archetype models, there appears to be no way to enforce
that the class to be used for some specific piece of information is
exactly that class and not one of its subtypes. For example, what if it
is
Kerry
The archetype editor sets this constraint for dv_date_time using a
syntax for the purpose.
At present the other reference model classes are not available in the
same manner - that is they do not impinge directly on the data.
Generally, one assumes that in the reference model people will
Dear All
The openEHR design team have, over many years, decided to separate the
demographic information from the EHR data. Advantages are, amongst others:
1. Security - you need access to both sets of data to know about an
individual
2. Normalisation - you can find people even though they have
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2674 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20050307/1216af1f/attachment.bin
lakewood at copper.net wrote:
Hi Sam,
Is the indicated sentence correct?
Regards!
-Thomas Clark
The EHR model has quite different classes than the EHR model - and
the archetypes are therefore different.
^^
'EHR model'--- 'EHR
Kerry Raymond wrote:
There are undeniably enormous challenges in this area.
However, right now, we have a health system that operates off bits of
paper augmented with IT here and there. Can we verify the authenticity
of a medical record from the 1970s today? Will a paper health record
Two simpel questions, though the answer may be complicated
1) Is there an OID which can be used if there is no OID known, f.e. 0.0.0.0.0
2) I work for a comany which wants to use the insurance-number of a patient
for a special goal. It only wants the Insurance-number.
What is the best way to
Dear Bert,
As you know, I am not technical enough to respond to you on OID construction,
but I wanted you to know that I am sensitive to the OID-heavy nature of 13606
at present, and will look to ways to ease the implementation burden. I suspect
your concerns will be shared by many.
With best
Thanks Dipa, I hope it helps
best regards
Bert Verhees
Op maandag 7 maart 2005 15:06, schreef Dipak Kalra:
Dear Bert,
As you know, I am not technical enough to respond to you on OID
construction, but I wanted you to know that I am sensitive to the OID-heavy
nature of 13606 at present, and
Thomas Beale wrote:
Dear all,
there is an anomaly in the openEHR software as of Friday. The ADL
reference parser, archetype workbench, and archetype valdiator have
been rebuilt with small improvements to the dADL handling code, and
with corrected handling of paths, which now must
Bert Verhees wrote:
Two simpel questions, though the answer may be complicated
1) Is there an OID which can be used if there is no OID known, f.e. 0.0.0.0.0
2) I work for a comany which wants to use the insurance-number of a patient
for a special goal. It only wants the Insurance-number.
What
Bert Verhees wrote:
Now I must tell them they have to recognize the InsuranceNumbere from
the OID which points to InsuranceCompany, somewhere??.
There has to be a service on the Internet where one can translate
OID's to friendly names, something like DNS for IP. Or else, this
system
Bert Verhees wrote:
In openEHR, in the RM.COMMON.IDENTIFICATION package you could find some
classes that perhaps can cover your requirements better, this are
OBJECT_REF, OBJECT_ID and HIER_OBJECT_ID Classes. This is interesting
because a beautiful reflexion about identification and
I vote for the pragmatic approach when we don't control the reference model
quote who=Kerry Raymond
A pragmatic approach would be to do what you say. We could probably
argue for this just on the basis of the fact that many reference
models (i.e. object models) are not well constructed, and
However, right now, we have a health system that operates off bits of
paper augmented with IT here and there.
...
Surely the goal of EHR is to do better than the existing systems in some
areas (so there is benefit in choosing EHR), and no worse in others (so
there is no significant
17 matches
Mail list logo
