Bert Verhees wrote:
>> You refer to machine computer system interfaces and that these might
>> be proprietary. Yes they could and will.
>> But when the holy grail is about plug-and-play interoperability then
>> these interfaces (archetypes) must be free to use.
>>
>
> Gerard, how about SNOMED-
Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote:
> www.zorginformatiemodel.nl has about 85 stroke patient related
> archetypes.
> unfortunately most are in Dutch, but we have translated about 10 to
> English now, most the simple ones or the ones that explain the
> approach also in more technical way.
>
> Key i
These are archetypes in which the clinicians materials are sorted out, coded
etc.
They currently are made operational for use in a message. Sam has worked with
the Barthel index, which based on this example for R-MIM, however based on the
tables, could be written up in ADL language in less tha
nt was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060505/615f1b5a/attachment.html>
s it
> operational, but unbound to specific technology.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060505/7f32b523/attachment.html>
Thomas Beale wrote:
> Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote:
>> www.zorginformatiemodel.nl has about 85 stroke patient related
>> archetypes.
>> unfortunately most are in Dutch, but we have translated about 10 to
>> English now, most the simple ones or the ones that explain the
>> approach also in more
ame thing at the level of the
> computer.
>
>
>
>
> Gerard
>
See our agenda for the next year,
thank you Gerard,
William
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060505/7e425796/attachment.html>
7 matches
Mail list logo
