On 04-09-12 20:06, Diego Bosc? wrote:
> The big question is, how does it affect us?
HL7 is primary a way of messaging. In the Netherlands HL7 is very
important, as message format. All (I mean ALL) the underlying systems
which create the messages have legacy datamodel-storage.
There is no such th
al mailing list
openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7446 (20120904) ______
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Anti
___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120904/d185a666/attachment-0001.html>
It isn't, cost is not a question on the debate anymore. Very smart
move by HL7 folks.
2012/9/4 Timothy Cook :
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Diego Bosc? wrote:
>> The big question is, how does it affect us?
>>
>
> From my POV, it is good for everyone.
> How can it possibly be a bad thing?
>
>
ht as well just use DV_EHR_URIs. The 13606 LINK has target
as a Set. I will create an issue on this at some point so we can
consider it further.
- thomas
-- next part ------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120904/b1f5f851/attachment.html>
The big question is, how does it affect us?
2012/9/4 Timothy Cook :
> Finally:
> http://www.hl7.org/about/faqs/FreeIP.cfm
>
>
>
> --
>
> Timothy Cook, MSc +55 21 94711995
> MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
> LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/
for those interested, I have been spending this month with Dr Stan
Huff's group at Intermountain Health in Salt lake City. I have at least
a dozen potential change requests / issues for openEHR. Mostly small,
but important in their way. That has come from the evidence of their
systems, and our
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Diego Bosc? wrote:
> The big question is, how does it affect us?
>
>From my POV, it is good for everyone.
How can it possibly be a bad thing?
--Tim
Hello Thomas
Thanks for your response, please see below.
> Doing this properly I think needs extra classes in the RM to represent
> notions of 'trial' 'site' and so on - we are talking with the CDISC
> people about doing this.
>
> For now it would have to be done with references to a COMPOSITION
Finally:
http://www.hl7.org/about/faqs/FreeIP.cfm
--
Timothy Cook, MSc +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
Skype ID == timothy.cook
Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academi
Hello everyone
I am coming across an openEHR use case for which there seem to be more
than one ways to deal with and that i would appreciate your help with.
The main question is this:
When creating COMPOSITIONs that describe Template(able) stand-alone
entities that are well defined and should h
difficult is that at
runtime you get data which is nearly what is intended, but some detail
is different. Do you establish the reference or not?
- thomas
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120904/d62d523f/attachment.html>
12 matches
Mail list logo
