Hi Thomas, great news! and looking forward to help on the specs. -- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos
> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:19:07 -0600 > From: thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com > To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org; openehr-clinical at > lists.openehr.org > Subject: lessons from Intermountain Health, and starting work on openEHR 2.x > > > for those interested, I have been spending this month with Dr Stan > Huff's group at Intermountain Health in Salt lake City. I have at least > a dozen potential change requests / issues for openEHR. Mostly small, > but important in their way. That has come from the evidence of their > systems, and our performing a cross-review during this month. The > comparison has shown that we (i.e. openEHR and Intermountain) have > essentially the same multi-level modelling system, with different > details. Plus I have learned a lot in terms of their design philosophy > and thinking. > > Essentially we can think of these as distilled wisdom/lessons from > various incarnations of Stan's leading edge 3M/ASN.1 environment over 15 > years, up to the most recent, the Qualibria system using 'CDL' (the ADL > equivalent). > > I'll put these into the openEHR Jira SPEC-PR issue tracker for everyone > to see over the next couple of weeks, plus on the mailing lists for more > general things I have learned here. > > The new openEHR Spec programme should get up and running in the next few > weeks, which will mean that people here who want to nominate for working > on the various specs (i.e. working toward openEHR v2.0) should have a > think about doing that. The governance details are mostly worked out, so > it just needs people. > > I know some people feel that the specs have not been changing for too > long (myself included) but on the other hand, they have stood up > amazingly well over the last few years, and we have a huge amount of > industry knowledge accumulated, most of which I think is captured on the > PR issue tracker, and at least on the mailing lists. Also, we have a > pretty decent ADL/AOM 1.5 spec, which needs community review. AQL has > also been implemented a number of times and heavily used now, and has > held up very well. There are things to change there, based on its use in > industry. > > So, soon we can start on getting a new version of openEHR... it will be > a great opportunity I think, to include the clinical and technical > lessons available to us in the next generation platform. The community > here is wide-ranging and has a huge amount of knowledge... time to use it! > > - thomas > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120904/d185a666/attachment-0001.html>
