Re: Advantage of ISO

I understand the purpose of the ND, and I think, as you, that it is important. and all standards that are not registered by an SDO have this problem. So it is a commonly occurring problem, that is why Creative Commons has an answer for that. I think that works allright. I see no problem in the

Re: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 43, Issue 22

Hi William, RFC - Request for Comment http://www.rfc-editor.org/RFCoverview.html -SA - Share-alike clause of a CC-BY-SA licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ which applies to openEHR -published artefacts. Basically you are free to use as long as you continue to share any forked

Re: Advantage of ISO

Thanks Gerard, That is very positive and helpful. Would you consider adjusting to ‘ openEHR is a not-for-profit company established by UCL’ which I hope captures your reservations about single ownership without giving the impression that this is a 'for-profit 'company? Ian Dr Ian McNicoll

Re: Advantage of ISO

On 07-09-15 16:02, Ian McNicoll wrote: Thanks Gerard, That is very positive and helpful. Would you consider adjusting to ‘ openEHR is a not-for-profit company established by UCL’ which I hope captures your reservations about single ownership without giving the impression that this is a

Re: Advantage of ISO

Many thanks Gerard, Much appreciated, Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director,

Re: Advantage of ISO

Can someone help to take me off the list. I have signed into the list and unsubscribe and still unsuccessful. On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ian McNicoll wrote: > Thanks Gerard, > > That is very positive and helpful. Would you consider adjusting to ‘ > openEHR is a

Re: Advantage of ISO

Dear Ian, As I wrote you privately I promised to think over my use of words. Referring to my e-mail with the definition, as I used it, plus the quote from the openEHR website, it must have been clear that I was pointing at ownership of the openEHR organisation. I’m aware now, that

Re: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 43, Issue 22

Can someone help to take me off the list. I have signed into the list and unsubscribe and still unsuccessful. On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 5:05 PM, William Goossen wrote: > Dear all, > > Can anyone explain what ND, SA and RFC stand for? > > I personally do not believe in

Re: Advantage of ISO

I will consider this. Gerard Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl > On 7 sep. 2015, at 16:02, Ian McNicoll wrote: > > Thanks Gerard, > > That is very positive and helpful. Would you consider adjusting to ‘ openEHR > is a not-for-profit company

Re: A question about the XML schema for version 1.4 archetypes

Can someone help to take me off the list. I have signed into the list and unsubscribe and still unsuccessful. On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Barnet David (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION CENTRE) wrote: > I have a question about the XML schema for archetypes based

Re: Advantage of ISO

On 07-09-15 16:15, Bert Verhees wrote: does he still think the word "proprietary" is appropriate for the specifications correction, must be: do you still think the word "proprietary" is appropriate for the specifications ___ openEHR-technical

Re: Advantage of ISO

Dear Ian, I wrote I will consider it. I can accept your proposition. It is factually the truth. Gerard Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl > On 7 sep. 2015, at 16:02, Ian McNicoll wrote: > > Thanks Gerard, > > That is very positive and