Thanks for your replies everyone! As the scale does have descriptions for
scores of 0,2, 4 and 6, I don’t think representing this as only a count would
work. Perhaps Pablo’s suggestion is the best, even though it does mean changing
the wording of the scale (arguably for the better).
Regards,
Si
Following Thomas, I think for the missing descriptions you might need to
put "between x and y" if x and y are available descriptions.
Sent from my LG Mobile
-- Original message--From: Thomas BealeDate: Tue, Apr 26, 2016 12:42To:
openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org;Subjec
On 26/04/2016 19:54, David Moner wrote:
I will not discuss about the readiness of that particular scale. But
un general words, we are very accustomed to scales where you have to
answer "From 1 to 10, score your satisfaction with the service
provided, with 1 meaning 'not satisfied at all' and 1
I would tend to agree with the suggestion to model this as a DV_COUNT
rather than a DV_ORDINAL.
Ian
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 at 19:54, David Moner wrote:
> I will not discuss about the readiness of that particular scale. But un
> general words, we are very accustomed to scales where you have to answe
I will not discuss about the readiness of that particular scale. But un
general words, we are very accustomed to scales where you have to answer
"From 1 to 10, score your satisfaction with the service provided, with 1
meaning 'not satisfied at all' and 10 meaning 'completely satisfied'". I
guess th
Technically speaking it is in fact possible to create an alternative
of two different data types in a given attribute (say for example in
your use case, DV_ORDINAL (1,low) , DV_COUNT (2), DV_ORDINAL
(3,medium), DV_COUNT (4), DV_ORDINAL (5,high)).
In any case I agree with Thomas that this scale prob
If you give someone a '3' on the Apparent Sadness scale, what does it
mean? Apparently it's /between /'Looks dispirited but does brighten up
without difficulty' and 'Appears sad and unhappy most of the time'
So now imagine that this '3' appears for me in my record - just that
value. The sc
Hi Silje,
If I read
http://www.openehr.org/releases/RM/Release-1.0.3/docs/data_types/data_types.html#_dv_ordinal_class
correctly, it seems to imply that the minimum you do is to give the text the
same value as the ordinal value: "...which may be strings made from + symbols,
or other enumeratio
Hi everyone,
We're working on an archetype for the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale
(MADRS). This scale contains several ordinal values where there is no
description, and some where there is no text at all. This doesn't work very
well in archetypes, and particularly when uploading to a
9 matches
Mail list logo
