Crowdsourcing = Errata submission perhaps here
http://oreilly.com/catalog/errata.csp?isbn=0636920020110
Of the reviews I read there was reference to 'rushed' missing chapters, and
poor proof reading.
Tom Seabury
From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org
I see this as an opportunity for some joint work on specification of
terminology binding, in the intersection of interests between the openEHR
community and for one: IHTSDO.
I hope the following notes are both helpful and true, corrections are most
welcome!
[Specialists language from the
Hi Thomas,
At the point you state 'we can't prevent medical researchers from creating
questionnaires with purely boolean answers' I recognised a critical
distinction, it is one we know quite well: The distinction between how data
entry/review elements are built into clinical applications - the
I cannot claim to be an implementer of openEHR but I am still interested to
understand the proposed use of Tables.
Can anyone point me to a place where this is already explained with examples,
the abstract discussion is a little hard to follow.
My simple reading of this is that what are
4 matches
Mail list logo
